Can the order in which personal inflections on verbs disappear, or cease to be distinctive, be put down to:
1. Phonetic/phonemic similarity or distinctiveness
2. Frequency of use
3. A global universal tendency
4. Morphologicla or syntactic factors (e.g. use of subject pronouns)
5. Something else
?
On the order of the loss of personal verbal inflections
- Particles the Greek
- Lebom
- Posts: 181
- Joined: Tue Sep 17, 2013 1:48 am
- Location: Between clauses
On the order of the loss of personal verbal inflections
Non fidendus est crocodilus quis posteriorem dentem acerbum conquetur.
- Hallow XIII
- Avisaru
- Posts: 846
- Joined: Sun Nov 04, 2012 3:40 pm
- Location: Under Heaven
Re: On the order of the loss of personal verbal inflections
Your question seems to assume such an order necessarily exists.
陳第 wrote:蓋時有古今,地有南北;字有更革,音有轉移,亦勢所必至。
Read all about my excellent conlangsR.Rusanov wrote:seks istiyorum
sex want-PRS-1sg
Basic Conlanging Advice
Re: On the order of the loss of personal verbal inflections
As cop-outy as this answer sounds, I'm gonna guess it has to depend on the language.
Just look at the Romance languages. Just a few changes like /ae/ > /e/ literally obliterated the case system of Latin, yet the verbal system though greatly atrophied is still intact. In the meanwhile, it can't just be "use of subject pronouns" because German has obligatory verbal person-marking AND pronouns. English just chucked out the system (when it could have) but German didn't.
Just look at the Romance languages. Just a few changes like /ae/ > /e/ literally obliterated the case system of Latin, yet the verbal system though greatly atrophied is still intact. In the meanwhile, it can't just be "use of subject pronouns" because German has obligatory verbal person-marking AND pronouns. English just chucked out the system (when it could have) but German didn't.
Nūdhrēmnāva naraśva, dṛk śraṣrāsit nūdhrēmanīṣṣ iźdatīyyīm woḥīm madhēyyaṣṣi.
satisfaction-DEF.SG-LOC live.PERFECTIVE-1P.INCL but work-DEF.SG-PRIV satisfaction-DEF.PL.NOM weakeness-DEF.PL-DAT only lead-FUT-3P
satisfaction-DEF.SG-LOC live.PERFECTIVE-1P.INCL but work-DEF.SG-PRIV satisfaction-DEF.PL.NOM weakeness-DEF.PL-DAT only lead-FUT-3P
Re: On the order of the loss of personal verbal inflections
Personal inflections on verbs don't disappear in a set order. As far as those languages whose histories I am familiar with are concerned (which is quite a lot, in honesty), the motivating factor behind personal inflections becoming indistinct/being lost is always soundchange.araceli wrote:Can the order in which personal inflections on verbs disappear, or cease to be distinctive, be put down to:
1. Phonetic/phonemic similarity or distinctiveness
2. Frequency of use
3. A global universal tendency
4. Morphologicla or syntactic factors (e.g. use of subject pronouns)
5. Something else
?
Salmoneus wrote:(NB Dewrad is behaving like an adult - a petty, sarcastic and uncharitable adult, admittedly, but none the less note the infinitely higher quality of flame)
- Drydic
- Smeric
- Posts: 1652
- Joined: Tue Oct 08, 2002 12:23 pm
- Location: I am a prisoner in my own mind.
- Contact:
Re: On the order of the loss of personal verbal inflections
Example: in Spanish, the 3rd person singular is the least marked (yes I am aware that it is not fully unmarked in all tenses or conjugations), yet in English the 3rd person singular is the only one (outside of be) with any distinctive marking (in the present, at least).
- Particles the Greek
- Lebom
- Posts: 181
- Joined: Tue Sep 17, 2013 1:48 am
- Location: Between clauses
Re: On the order of the loss of personal verbal inflections
In other words "I can merge the personal inflections of my verbs in any reasonably plausible way I want to". That's reassuring.
Non fidendus est crocodilus quis posteriorem dentem acerbum conquetur.
Re: On the order of the loss of personal verbal inflections
According to this http://typo.uni-konstanz.de/rara/nav/br ... ?number=34 that is extremely rare, with English as the only given example.Nessari wrote:in English the 3rd person singular is the only one (outside of be) with any distinctive marking (in the present, at least).
http://typo.uni-konstanz.de/archive/nav ... try_id=280 Apparently third and first person zero-expression are the most common. As for why, your hypothesis is as good as mine.
Exits, pursued by a bear.
- Drydic
- Smeric
- Posts: 1652
- Joined: Tue Oct 08, 2002 12:23 pm
- Location: I am a prisoner in my own mind.
- Contact:
Re: On the order of the loss of personal verbal inflections
They're two of the most common, if not the two most common, verb forms that occur. (granted if we don't split out by number there's usually only 3 contestants, but still)Jess wrote:According to this http://typo.uni-konstanz.de/rara/nav/br ... ?number=34 that is extremely rare, with English as the only given example.Nessari wrote:in English the 3rd person singular is the only one (outside of be) with any distinctive marking (in the present, at least).
http://typo.uni-konstanz.de/archive/nav ... try_id=280 Apparently third and first person zero-expression are the most common. As for why, your hypothesis is as good as mine.