Natlangs that look like conlangs
Natlangs that look like conlangs
Do you know any natlangs that look like conlangs or have unusual representations of phonemes in their orthography?
I know that Saanich and Taa are like this, they are written with an unusual orthography (Saanich all uppercase, Taa uses IPA with additional letters).
I know that Saanich and Taa are like this, they are written with an unusual orthography (Saanich all uppercase, Taa uses IPA with additional letters).
Hello there. Chirp chirp chirp.
-
- Avisaru
- Posts: 593
- Joined: Sun Jul 07, 2013 3:03 pm
- Location: Nijmegen, Netherlands
Re: Natlangs that look like conlangs
Since when are conlangs frequently written all-uppercase, and since when are natlangs markedly less likely to be written using IPA or Americanist characters than conlangs? (Note, e.g. African languages, where ⟨ɛ ɔ⟩ are very frequently used orthographically, a range of languages in which ⟨ə⟩ or its Cyrillic counterpart ⟨ә⟩ is used orthographically (for things ranging from /ɨ/ to /æ/), and the languages which use ⟨ʼ⟩ to mark ejectives.)
Dibotahamdn duthma jallni agaynni ra hgitn lakrhmi.
Amuhawr jalla vowa vta hlakrhi hdm duthmi xaja.
Irdro. Irdro. Irdro. Irdro. Irdro. Irdro. Irdro.
Amuhawr jalla vowa vta hlakrhi hdm duthmi xaja.
Irdro. Irdro. Irdro. Irdro. Irdro. Irdro. Irdro.
- Nortaneous
- Sumerul
- Posts: 4544
- Joined: Mon Apr 13, 2009 1:52 am
- Location: the Imperial Corridor
Re: Natlangs that look like conlangs
there is a natlang called Ulithian
Siöö jandeng raiglin zåbei tandiüłåd;
nää džunnfin kukuch vklaivei sivei tåd.
Chei. Chei. Chei. Chei. Chei. Chei. Chei.
nää džunnfin kukuch vklaivei sivei tåd.
Chei. Chei. Chei. Chei. Chei. Chei. Chei.
Re: Natlangs that look like conlangs
It uses clickbars (and why not?), but it's really not written in IPA. Here's the consonant inventory of West !Xoon in IPA:Birdlang wrote:Taa uses IPA with additional letters
And here it is in the orthography:
"It will not come by waiting for it. It will not be said, 'Here it is,' or 'There it is.' Rather, the Kingdom of the Father is spread out upon the earth, and men do not see it."
– The Gospel of Thomas
– The Gospel of Thomas
Re: Natlangs that look like conlangs
I'm glad I'm not the only one who thought that <gq> is a good way to represent /ɢ/.
"But if of ships I now should sing, what ship would come to me,
What ship would bear me ever back across so wide a Sea?”
What ship would bear me ever back across so wide a Sea?”
-
- Avisaru
- Posts: 593
- Joined: Sun Jul 07, 2013 3:03 pm
- Location: Nijmegen, Netherlands
Re: Natlangs that look like conlangs
Wait, Taa has voiced ejectives? I thought those were impossible.
-
- Sanci
- Posts: 27
- Joined: Sun Sep 25, 2011 12:14 pm
Re: Natlangs that look like conlangs
The voiced aspirate and ejectives are said to be mixed-voice, at least phonetically -- they start out as a normal voiced consonant, then devoice in the middle before the release.Dē Graut Bʉr wrote:Wait, Taa has voiced ejectives? I thought those were impossible.
Thus: [dtʰ, dtsʼ].
-
- Avisaru
- Posts: 734
- Joined: Sat Aug 18, 2007 1:47 pm
- Location: Leiden, the Netherlands
Re: Natlangs that look like conlangs
Ok that does sound like a conlangsuoenatroN wrote:there is a natlang called Ulithian
I think langauges like Taa are too complicated for even a conlanger to make up
Re: Natlangs that look like conlangs
It's a bit more complicated than that. Voiced ejective stops in !Xoon have a voiced closure, but it is different from a normal voiced closure-- the voicing is weaker and less regular (the article I have just calls it "glottal pulses of decreasing amplitude"). The release is also different from that of a regular ejective: there is no audible posterior release of the glottal closure, and the vowel onset is strongly laryngealized, i.e. the glottal closure slowly releases instead of there being a burst release. There's also a less prominent pause between the release of the consonant and the onset of the vowel.cntrational wrote:The voiced aspirate and ejectives are said to be mixed-voice, at least phonetically -- they start out as a normal voiced consonant, then devoice in the middle before the release.Dē Graut Bʉr wrote:Wait, Taa has voiced ejectives? I thought those were impossible.
Thus: [dtʰ, dtsʼ].
"It will not come by waiting for it. It will not be said, 'Here it is,' or 'There it is.' Rather, the Kingdom of the Father is spread out upon the earth, and men do not see it."
– The Gospel of Thomas
– The Gospel of Thomas
Re: Natlangs that look like conlangs
Ulithian uses a, e, and o with a single dot over them in the alphabet, for who knows what, and I have seen a Taa example using a small capital g.
Hello there. Chirp chirp chirp.
Re: Natlangs that look like conlangs
I have seen at least one conlang with all capitals called High Speech that appears to be a mixed language. And Americanist letters are used in some linguistic papers instead of the IPA, even though some of those precomposed base letter and diacritics are hard to make (not many fonts have capital m with hook in them, more have the combining comma), schwas and turned e are used all over the Pacific Northwest in the native tribal languages as well as Taos and a few other southwestern US languages, and turned e is used all over Africa, Dan language also uses turned h from IPA, but in this language it apparently is a vowel. It also uses turned e. I have seen more than one language that uses Latin extended C characters (Melpa, Ktunaxa, some languages in Africa in Senegal that use a p with a stroke, w with hook in Africa), but Latin extended D for the Saltillo and modifier letters.Travis B. wrote:Since when are conlangs frequently written all-uppercase, and since when are natlangs markedly less likely to be written using IPA or Americanist characters than conlangs? (Note, e.g. African languages, where ⟨ɛ ɔ⟩ are very frequently used orthographically, a range of languages in which ⟨ə⟩ or its Cyrillic counterpart ⟨ә⟩ is used orthographically (for things ranging from /ɨ/ to /æ/), and the languages which use ⟨ʼ⟩ to mark ejectives.)
Hello there. Chirp chirp chirp.
- احمکي ارش-ھجن
- Avisaru
- Posts: 516
- Joined: Mon Dec 02, 2013 12:45 pm
Re: Natlangs that look like conlangs
There is a thread around here called "If natlangs were conlangs": viewtopic.php?f=7&t=42608
Similar enough innit?
Similar enough innit?
ʾAšol ḵavad pulqam ʾifbižen lav ʾifšimeḻ lit maseḡrad lav lit n͛ubad. ʾUpulasim ṗal sa-panžun lav sa-ḥadṇ lav ṗal šarmaḵeš lit ʾaẏṭ waẏyadanun wižqanam.
- Article 1 of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights.
- Article 1 of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights.
-
- Avisaru
- Posts: 734
- Joined: Sat Aug 18, 2007 1:47 pm
- Location: Leiden, the Netherlands
Re: Natlangs that look like conlangs
Lithuanian also has single dots on letters how is that weird.Birdlang wrote:Ulithian uses a, e, and o with a single dot over them in the alphabet, for who knows what, and I have seen a Taa example using a small capital g.
As a general pet peeve, I think linguists should stop making up whacko symbols for the languages they describe. Firstly, it's ncredibly hard to type especially for people who will have only primitive access to digital resources. This is 2015 and even Indians in the amazon have cellphones and many will want access to the internet at least occasionally, and it doesnt help if you make it impossible to type the damn language. Secondly, it's often opaque what is meant with those whacko symbols, or at least it's not more transparent than when you come up with other solutions such as digraphs.
I would keep diacritics and funny symbols to an absolute minimum, preferably not using more than what is used in the lingua franca of the area (so in the brazilian amazon ~s on letters are okay).
Then again the language family I am interested in currently already has a pretty established orthography for most of its languages which is already relatively old for a native american language, so there's little need to deviate from that if it is not necessary for one particular language.
-
- Lebom
- Posts: 168
- Joined: Thu Dec 22, 2011 1:13 pm
- Location: Ohio
Re: Natlangs that look like conlangs
Just curious, what are some of the "whacko symbols" that you're thinking of? Outside of the IPA I can really only think of Americanist orthographies as having some "whacko symbols", such as the ejective barred lambda. But most of those have been around for the better part of a hundred years IIRC. What strange new symbols have come into use recently?sirdanilot wrote:As a general pet peeve, I think linguists should stop making up whacko symbols for the languages they describe. Firstly, it's ncredibly hard to type especially for people who will have only primitive access to digital resources. This is 2015 and even Indians in the amazon have cellphones and many will want access to the internet at least occasionally, and it doesnt help if you make it impossible to type the damn language. Secondly, it's often opaque what is meant with those whacko symbols, or at least it's not more transparent than when you come up with other solutions such as digraphs.
I would keep diacritics and funny symbols to an absolute minimum, preferably not using more than what is used in the lingua franca of the area (so in the brazilian amazon ~s on letters are okay).
Then again the language family I am interested in currently already has a pretty established orthography for most of its languages which is already relatively old for a native american language, so there's little need to deviate from that if it is not necessary for one particular language.
- Nortaneous
- Sumerul
- Posts: 4544
- Joined: Mon Apr 13, 2009 1:52 am
- Location: the Imperial Corridor
Re: Natlangs that look like conlangs
there's a language somewhere in africa that uses @ as a letter with a capital form. there are other languages in africa that have shit like y with hook, the florin sign, ʋ, etc. as letters.
Siöö jandeng raiglin zåbei tandiüłåd;
nää džunnfin kukuch vklaivei sivei tåd.
Chei. Chei. Chei. Chei. Chei. Chei. Chei.
nää džunnfin kukuch vklaivei sivei tåd.
Chei. Chei. Chei. Chei. Chei. Chei. Chei.
Re: Natlangs that look like conlangs
Quite a few Native American languages use <7> to represent /ʔ/; Tlingit uses <.>--and since it also has /ʔʷ/, this also gives us <.w>.
"But if of ships I now should sing, what ship would come to me,
What ship would bear me ever back across so wide a Sea?”
What ship would bear me ever back across so wide a Sea?”
Re: Natlangs that look like conlangs
that's Koalibthere's a language somewhere in africa that uses @ as a letter with a capital form.
------
Repost from CBB:
I, on CBB wrote:if it is a natlang, then the text in the spoiler (Sakao) looks like a conlang
More: show
Re: Natlangs that look like conlangs
I suppose nobody's mentioned Arapaho yet.
"It will not come by waiting for it. It will not be said, 'Here it is,' or 'There it is.' Rather, the Kingdom of the Father is spread out upon the earth, and men do not see it."
– The Gospel of Thomas
– The Gospel of Thomas