Natlangs that look like conlangs

Discussion of natural languages, or language in general.
Post Reply
Birdlang
Avisaru
Avisaru
Posts: 427
Joined: Sat Dec 27, 2014 5:34 am
Location: Virginia

Natlangs that look like conlangs

Post by Birdlang »

Do you know any natlangs that look like conlangs or have unusual representations of phonemes in their orthography?
I know that Saanich and Taa are like this, they are written with an unusual orthography (Saanich all uppercase, Taa uses IPA with additional letters).
Hello there. Chirp chirp chirp.

Dē Graut Bʉr
Avisaru
Avisaru
Posts: 593
Joined: Sun Jul 07, 2013 3:03 pm
Location: Nijmegen, Netherlands

Re: Natlangs that look like conlangs

Post by Dē Graut Bʉr »

What do conlangs look like?

Travis B.
Sumerul
Sumerul
Posts: 3570
Joined: Mon Jun 20, 2005 12:47 pm
Location: Milwaukee, US

Re: Natlangs that look like conlangs

Post by Travis B. »

Since when are conlangs frequently written all-uppercase, and since when are natlangs markedly less likely to be written using IPA or Americanist characters than conlangs? (Note, e.g. African languages, where ⟨ɛ ɔ⟩ are very frequently used orthographically, a range of languages in which ⟨ə⟩ or its Cyrillic counterpart ⟨ә⟩ is used orthographically (for things ranging from /ɨ/ to /æ/), and the languages which use ⟨ʼ⟩ to mark ejectives.)
Dibotahamdn duthma jallni agaynni ra hgitn lakrhmi.
Amuhawr jalla vowa vta hlakrhi hdm duthmi xaja.
Irdro. Irdro. Irdro. Irdro. Irdro. Irdro. Irdro.

User avatar
Nortaneous
Sumerul
Sumerul
Posts: 4544
Joined: Mon Apr 13, 2009 1:52 am
Location: the Imperial Corridor

Re: Natlangs that look like conlangs

Post by Nortaneous »

there is a natlang called Ulithian
Siöö jandeng raiglin zåbei tandiüłåd;
nää džunnfin kukuch vklaivei sivei tåd.
Chei. Chei. Chei. Chei. Chei. Chei. Chei.

User avatar
Xephyr
Avisaru
Avisaru
Posts: 821
Joined: Sat May 03, 2003 3:04 pm

Re: Natlangs that look like conlangs

Post by Xephyr »

Birdlang wrote:Taa uses IPA with additional letters
It uses clickbars (and why not?), but it's really not written in IPA. Here's the consonant inventory of West !Xoon in IPA:
Image

And here it is in the orthography:
Image
"It will not come by waiting for it. It will not be said, 'Here it is,' or 'There it is.' Rather, the Kingdom of the Father is spread out upon the earth, and men do not see it."
The Gospel of Thomas

User avatar
Zaarin
Smeric
Smeric
Posts: 1136
Joined: Sun Aug 15, 2010 5:00 pm

Re: Natlangs that look like conlangs

Post by Zaarin »

I'm glad I'm not the only one who thought that <gq> is a good way to represent /ɢ/.
"But if of ships I now should sing, what ship would come to me,
What ship would bear me ever back across so wide a Sea?”

Dē Graut Bʉr
Avisaru
Avisaru
Posts: 593
Joined: Sun Jul 07, 2013 3:03 pm
Location: Nijmegen, Netherlands

Re: Natlangs that look like conlangs

Post by Dē Graut Bʉr »

Wait, Taa has voiced ejectives? I thought those were impossible.

cntrational
Sanci
Sanci
Posts: 27
Joined: Sun Sep 25, 2011 12:14 pm

Re: Natlangs that look like conlangs

Post by cntrational »

Dē Graut Bʉr wrote:Wait, Taa has voiced ejectives? I thought those were impossible.
The voiced aspirate and ejectives are said to be mixed-voice, at least phonetically -- they start out as a normal voiced consonant, then devoice in the middle before the release.

Thus: [dtʰ, dtsʼ].

sirdanilot
Avisaru
Avisaru
Posts: 734
Joined: Sat Aug 18, 2007 1:47 pm
Location: Leiden, the Netherlands

Re: Natlangs that look like conlangs

Post by sirdanilot »

‮suoenatroN wrote:there is a natlang called Ulithian
Ok that does sound like a conlang

I think langauges like Taa are too complicated for even a conlanger to make up

User avatar
Xephyr
Avisaru
Avisaru
Posts: 821
Joined: Sat May 03, 2003 3:04 pm

Re: Natlangs that look like conlangs

Post by Xephyr »

cntrational wrote:
Dē Graut Bʉr wrote:Wait, Taa has voiced ejectives? I thought those were impossible.
The voiced aspirate and ejectives are said to be mixed-voice, at least phonetically -- they start out as a normal voiced consonant, then devoice in the middle before the release.

Thus: [dtʰ, dtsʼ].
It's a bit more complicated than that. Voiced ejective stops in !Xoon have a voiced closure, but it is different from a normal voiced closure-- the voicing is weaker and less regular (the article I have just calls it "glottal pulses of decreasing amplitude"). The release is also different from that of a regular ejective: there is no audible posterior release of the glottal closure, and the vowel onset is strongly laryngealized, i.e. the glottal closure slowly releases instead of there being a burst release. There's also a less prominent pause between the release of the consonant and the onset of the vowel.
"It will not come by waiting for it. It will not be said, 'Here it is,' or 'There it is.' Rather, the Kingdom of the Father is spread out upon the earth, and men do not see it."
The Gospel of Thomas

Birdlang
Avisaru
Avisaru
Posts: 427
Joined: Sat Dec 27, 2014 5:34 am
Location: Virginia

Re: Natlangs that look like conlangs

Post by Birdlang »

Ulithian uses a, e, and o with a single dot over them in the alphabet, for who knows what, and I have seen a Taa example using a small capital g.
Hello there. Chirp chirp chirp.

Birdlang
Avisaru
Avisaru
Posts: 427
Joined: Sat Dec 27, 2014 5:34 am
Location: Virginia

Re: Natlangs that look like conlangs

Post by Birdlang »

Travis B. wrote:Since when are conlangs frequently written all-uppercase, and since when are natlangs markedly less likely to be written using IPA or Americanist characters than conlangs? (Note, e.g. African languages, where ⟨ɛ ɔ⟩ are very frequently used orthographically, a range of languages in which ⟨ə⟩ or its Cyrillic counterpart ⟨ә⟩ is used orthographically (for things ranging from /ɨ/ to /æ/), and the languages which use ⟨ʼ⟩ to mark ejectives.)
I have seen at least one conlang with all capitals called High Speech that appears to be a mixed language. And Americanist letters are used in some linguistic papers instead of the IPA, even though some of those precomposed base letter and diacritics are hard to make (not many fonts have capital m with hook in them, more have the combining comma), schwas and turned e are used all over the Pacific Northwest in the native tribal languages as well as Taos and a few other southwestern US languages, and turned e is used all over Africa, Dan language also uses turned h from IPA, but in this language it apparently is a vowel. It also uses turned e. I have seen more than one language that uses Latin extended C characters (Melpa, Ktunaxa, some languages in Africa in Senegal that use a p with a stroke, w with hook in Africa), but Latin extended D for the Saltillo and modifier letters.
Hello there. Chirp chirp chirp.

User avatar
احمکي ارش-ھجن
Avisaru
Avisaru
Posts: 516
Joined: Mon Dec 02, 2013 12:45 pm

Re: Natlangs that look like conlangs

Post by احمکي ارش-ھجن »

There is a thread around here called "If natlangs were conlangs": viewtopic.php?f=7&t=42608
Similar enough innit?
ʾAšol ḵavad pulqam ʾifbižen lav ʾifšimeḻ lit maseḡrad lav lit n͛ubad. ʾUpulasim ṗal sa-panžun lav sa-ḥadṇ lav ṗal šarmaḵeš lit ʾaẏṭ waẏyadanun wižqanam.
- Article 1 of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights.

sirdanilot
Avisaru
Avisaru
Posts: 734
Joined: Sat Aug 18, 2007 1:47 pm
Location: Leiden, the Netherlands

Re: Natlangs that look like conlangs

Post by sirdanilot »

Birdlang wrote:Ulithian uses a, e, and o with a single dot over them in the alphabet, for who knows what, and I have seen a Taa example using a small capital g.
Lithuanian also has single dots on letters how is that weird.

As a general pet peeve, I think linguists should stop making up whacko symbols for the languages they describe. Firstly, it's ncredibly hard to type especially for people who will have only primitive access to digital resources. This is 2015 and even Indians in the amazon have cellphones and many will want access to the internet at least occasionally, and it doesnt help if you make it impossible to type the damn language. Secondly, it's often opaque what is meant with those whacko symbols, or at least it's not more transparent than when you come up with other solutions such as digraphs.

I would keep diacritics and funny symbols to an absolute minimum, preferably not using more than what is used in the lingua franca of the area (so in the brazilian amazon ~s on letters are okay).
Then again the language family I am interested in currently already has a pretty established orthography for most of its languages which is already relatively old for a native american language, so there's little need to deviate from that if it is not necessary for one particular language.

Porphyrogenitos
Lebom
Lebom
Posts: 168
Joined: Thu Dec 22, 2011 1:13 pm
Location: Ohio

Re: Natlangs that look like conlangs

Post by Porphyrogenitos »

sirdanilot wrote:As a general pet peeve, I think linguists should stop making up whacko symbols for the languages they describe. Firstly, it's ncredibly hard to type especially for people who will have only primitive access to digital resources. This is 2015 and even Indians in the amazon have cellphones and many will want access to the internet at least occasionally, and it doesnt help if you make it impossible to type the damn language. Secondly, it's often opaque what is meant with those whacko symbols, or at least it's not more transparent than when you come up with other solutions such as digraphs.

I would keep diacritics and funny symbols to an absolute minimum, preferably not using more than what is used in the lingua franca of the area (so in the brazilian amazon ~s on letters are okay).
Then again the language family I am interested in currently already has a pretty established orthography for most of its languages which is already relatively old for a native american language, so there's little need to deviate from that if it is not necessary for one particular language.
Just curious, what are some of the "whacko symbols" that you're thinking of? Outside of the IPA I can really only think of Americanist orthographies as having some "whacko symbols", such as the ejective barred lambda. But most of those have been around for the better part of a hundred years IIRC. What strange new symbols have come into use recently?

User avatar
Nortaneous
Sumerul
Sumerul
Posts: 4544
Joined: Mon Apr 13, 2009 1:52 am
Location: the Imperial Corridor

Re: Natlangs that look like conlangs

Post by Nortaneous »

there's a language somewhere in africa that uses @ as a letter with a capital form. there are other languages in africa that have shit like y with hook, the florin sign, ʋ, etc. as letters.
Siöö jandeng raiglin zåbei tandiüłåd;
nää džunnfin kukuch vklaivei sivei tåd.
Chei. Chei. Chei. Chei. Chei. Chei. Chei.

User avatar
Zaarin
Smeric
Smeric
Posts: 1136
Joined: Sun Aug 15, 2010 5:00 pm

Re: Natlangs that look like conlangs

Post by Zaarin »

Quite a few Native American languages use <7> to represent /ʔ/; Tlingit uses <.>--and since it also has /ʔʷ/, this also gives us <.w>.
"But if of ships I now should sing, what ship would come to me,
What ship would bear me ever back across so wide a Sea?”

opipik
Avisaru
Avisaru
Posts: 823
Joined: Tue Apr 07, 2015 3:42 am

Re: Natlangs that look like conlangs

Post by opipik »

there's a language somewhere in africa that uses @ as a letter with a capital form.
that's Koalib

------

Repost from CBB:
I, on CBB wrote:if it is a natlang, then the text in the spoiler (Sakao) looks like a conlang
More: show
Aan-ohe têtíkuen âl llâth. oevwar maavorghe vôgh loen.
Nnâr rki ghave gharya ghamruerp yehu ghamhavuel ghamtêp omagho kítê thôth nyô luen Sinar. Nnâr ghamlrô ther.
Ghamlrô mayaayan athoengoen kítê vê ghryap vârkuen âpârkoen vê "Kam! Yâru tíhuersa akar vriv tê tíkoeepín toeblâth itha, tíroespín eyeth hoero
Nnâr rki ghavê "Ghe! Tíroesp ohe hâr Tíroesp uevyól pere reghregh usi tê vôgh loen, oetoeloen ghítêp lathalan. Taasêr itê vôgh hâr títa-yalyal-tuet-kos-hov ohe, talro roer lâhân têtíkuen
Nnâr Yetar masangoer voton ghítíruep ohe mam non athoengoen ghavê gharoesp uevyól mam non ghavê gharoesp
Nnâr Yetar vê "Hu! ôruer thôth nyô yethan ghamavssol vôgh, aanengór vôgh têtíkuen âl. âtâm ghamlroes takar va gharoes-írêp-ín tevren va ite
Ghe! Yoen va nasangoer awues-kos-ín na aanengór, itê ghyavroghheri aanen itê
Yetar vê ghrya vusp rki ghahó. Ghamhó-tuet-hov ohe. Nóm moehoen oeroesp oetoehoengór thômôm nyô moehoer nâr
Mâthâm ni tímsyórín aasên tívê "Papel" huer Yetar vueskosín aan-ohe. Vuesp rki ghamhó-tuet-ho(v)-p-r ohe

User avatar
Xephyr
Avisaru
Avisaru
Posts: 821
Joined: Sat May 03, 2003 3:04 pm

Re: Natlangs that look like conlangs

Post by Xephyr »

I suppose nobody's mentioned Arapaho yet.
"It will not come by waiting for it. It will not be said, 'Here it is,' or 'There it is.' Rather, the Kingdom of the Father is spread out upon the earth, and men do not see it."
The Gospel of Thomas

Post Reply