The CLOTH set in low-back merged accents
Posted: Thu May 18, 2017 5:10 am
I think I've noticed something interesting with some American accents. I first noticed it when watching Breaking Bad, particularly with Anna Gunn.
What I hear is that she has [ɑː] in most THOUGHT words: thought, talk, law are |θɑːt, tʰɑːk, lɑː], i.e. the typical low-back merger. But I think I heard a rounded vowel in some other words, such as lost, long [lɒːst, lɒːŋ] (typically the CLOTH set).
(Note: I'm not interested in vowel length here.)
I think I've heard that pattern in regions where the cot-caught merger is relatively recent, such as parts of the West (but not California). I guess what happens is that:
- in most environments, where [ɑː] and [ɒː] used to contrast, they merged into [ɑː], so that lot and thought both have [ɑː];
- but in a few environments, due to the LOT-CLOTH split, only [ɒː] appeared (typically before voiceless fricatives and voiced velars), so presumably both lost and sauce still have [ɒː].
Have you noticed something similar? If you haven't, does that seem plausible at least? Or am I just talking out of my ass?
What I hear is that she has [ɑː] in most THOUGHT words: thought, talk, law are |θɑːt, tʰɑːk, lɑː], i.e. the typical low-back merger. But I think I heard a rounded vowel in some other words, such as lost, long [lɒːst, lɒːŋ] (typically the CLOTH set).
(Note: I'm not interested in vowel length here.)
I think I've heard that pattern in regions where the cot-caught merger is relatively recent, such as parts of the West (but not California). I guess what happens is that:
- in most environments, where [ɑː] and [ɒː] used to contrast, they merged into [ɑː], so that lot and thought both have [ɑː];
- but in a few environments, due to the LOT-CLOTH split, only [ɒː] appeared (typically before voiceless fricatives and voiced velars), so presumably both lost and sauce still have [ɒː].
Have you noticed something similar? If you haven't, does that seem plausible at least? Or am I just talking out of my ass?