Speaking of tone, I have noticed that along with English vowels preceding lenis/voiced consonants being longer than those preceding fortis/unvoiced consonants, there is a tone difference as well. So the vowel in "lift" has a high tone and "lived" has a low tone.
In Future English I have made this tone distinction phonemic by collapsing all coda fortis plosives to /ʔ/, and by de-voicing coda voiced fricatives.
Ridiculously small phonemic differences thread
Re: Ridiculously small phonemic differences thread
In my Mandarin speech (and my family's), /ar/ > [ᴀˤʴ] while /air//anr/ > [ɐ˞ɻ].
Edit: Now I'm pretty sure that the rhotic part of /ar/ includes both radical and postalveolar, not alveolar as shown by IPA. A previously mistaken IPA expression is fixed and labelled red.
All of the "alveolar" /ɹ/ means postalveolar /ɹ̠˔/, while [˞] means alveolar. This is purely due to display reasons.
And to be more ridiculously small, when preceded by /i/ or /u/, the radical part in /ar/ may be omitted.
Edit: Now I'm pretty sure that the rhotic part of /ar/ includes both radical and postalveolar, not alveolar as shown by IPA. A previously mistaken IPA expression is fixed and labelled red.
All of the "alveolar" /ɹ/ means postalveolar /ɹ̠˔/, while [˞] means alveolar. This is purely due to display reasons.
And to be more ridiculously small, when preceded by /i/ or /u/, the radical part in /ar/ may be omitted.
Last edited by Seirios on Mon Nov 03, 2014 1:51 pm, edited 2 times in total.
Always an adventurer, I guess.
-
Tone: Chao's notation.
Apical vowels: [ɿ]≈[z̞̩], [ʅ]≈[ɻ̞̩], [ʮ]≈[z̞̩ʷ], [ʯ]≈[ɻ̞̩ʷ].
Vowels: [ᴇ]=Mid front unrounded, [ᴀ]=Open central unrounded, [ⱺ]=Mid back rounded, [ⱻ]=Mid back unrounded.
-
Tone: Chao's notation.
Apical vowels: [ɿ]≈[z̞̩], [ʅ]≈[ɻ̞̩], [ʮ]≈[z̞̩ʷ], [ʯ]≈[ɻ̞̩ʷ].
Vowels: [ᴇ]=Mid front unrounded, [ᴀ]=Open central unrounded, [ⱺ]=Mid back rounded, [ⱻ]=Mid back unrounded.
- Nortaneous
- Sumerul

- Posts: 4544
- Joined: Mon Apr 13, 2009 1:52 am
- Location: the Imperial Corridor
Re: Ridiculously small phonemic differences thread
What's that one dialect of that one Caucasian language that contrasts pharyngeals and epiglottals?
Siöö jandeng raiglin zåbei tandiüłåd;
nää džunnfin kukuch vklaivei sivei tåd.
Chei. Chei. Chei. Chei. Chei. Chei. Chei.
nää džunnfin kukuch vklaivei sivei tåd.
Chei. Chei. Chei. Chei. Chei. Chei. Chei.
-
cntrational
- Sanci

- Posts: 27
- Joined: Sun Sep 25, 2011 12:14 pm
Re: Ridiculously small phonemic differences thread
Well, my (Indian) English contrasts /eɪ/ and /eː/ -- but only in loanwords from Indian languages. [ɛɪ] is the usual realization of the former.finlay wrote:diphthongized, and no, I've only heard anecdotally of English dialects that maintain(ed) a difference between eː and eɪ. I doubt they still exist. Generally they are heard as equivalent, although it's a marker of various regional accents.
For the record, there's no /oʊ/ /oː/ constrast -- /oʊ/ is [oː].
Re: Ridiculously small phonemic differences thread
That's different, though - i'm talking about maintaining an early modern or middle english distinction. I can't remember exactly, but I think it's something like tale as /te:l/ and tail as /teil/ - there are some accents in like yorkshire or norfolk that still keep the distinction...maybe.
Re: Ridiculously small phonemic differences thread
What is [ᴀ]?Seirios wrote:In my Mandarin speech (and my family's), /ar/ > [ᴀˤʴ] while /air//anr/ > [ɐɻ].
The conlanger formerly known as “the conlanger formerly known as Pole, the”.
If we don't study the mistakes of the future we're doomed to repeat them for the first time.
If we don't study the mistakes of the future we're doomed to repeat them for the first time.
-
cntrational
- Sanci

- Posts: 27
- Joined: Sun Sep 25, 2011 12:14 pm
Re: Ridiculously small phonemic differences thread
Commonly used in Sinitic linguistics to indicate a low central vowel. [ä] in IPA proper.Pole, the wrote:What is [ᴀ]?Seirios wrote:In my Mandarin speech (and my family's), /ar/ > [ᴀˤʴ] while /air//anr/ > [ɐɻ].
Re: Ridiculously small phonemic differences thread
Ok, thanks.
The conlanger formerly known as “the conlanger formerly known as Pole, the”.
If we don't study the mistakes of the future we're doomed to repeat them for the first time.
If we don't study the mistakes of the future we're doomed to repeat them for the first time.

