Coincidentally Identical Phonologies
- Hydroeccentricity
- Avisaru
- Posts: 257
- Joined: Mon Aug 05, 2013 10:01 pm
Coincidentally Identical Phonologies
I was trying to think if there are any unrelated languages that nonetheless have identical phonologies. Excluding that, what unrelated languages have the most similar phonologies? Off the top of my head I can think of Latin and Japanese (if you allow for different pronunciations of <r> and <u>), but that still differs in that Latin has two liquids, and allows far more clusters and final consonants. Is there another pairing that's closer?
"I'm sorry, when you have all As in every class in every semester, it's not easy to treat the idea that your views are fundamentally incoherent as a serious proposition."
Re: Coincidentally Identical Phonologies
The phonology of Ainu is way more similar to that of Japanese than is Latin or any Indo-European language. The main differences are that Ainu allows obstruents in final position (how many depends on the language) and lacks a voiced/voiceless contrast in its consonants and a length distinction in its vowels.
If you're disqualifying Ainu because, either due to prolonged contact or genetic relatedness or both, the resemblances can't be considered "coincidental", then looks at Austronesian languages. Plenty of languages in that family with small phoneme inventories and a pronounced preference for open syllables.
If you're disqualifying Ainu because, either due to prolonged contact or genetic relatedness or both, the resemblances can't be considered "coincidental", then looks at Austronesian languages. Plenty of languages in that family with small phoneme inventories and a pronounced preference for open syllables.
Re: Coincidentally Identical Phonologies
Europe clusters fairly well with the Austronesian languages of Southeast Asia in terms of phonotactics, though I wouldnt be surprised if you could go through the entire list of 1200+ languages and not find a single exact match to any European language's phonology, primarily because of the vowel systems.
Spanish to Greek is a fairly close match, though the languages sound quite different to the ear. Since the two languages' phonologies diverge away from each other as you go back in time, this could be called a coincidence, not due to language contact or genetic relationship, though it's far from an exact match. Other than that I think the best hope is to go for simple systems. There might be a language out in the Pacific Ocean that has re-evolved a voicing contrast and can therefore be matched with Japanese. Perhaps if prenasalized stops are considered to be phonemically identical with plain voiced stops it'll be easier. (Old Japanese had prenasalized stops.)
Spanish to Greek is a fairly close match, though the languages sound quite different to the ear. Since the two languages' phonologies diverge away from each other as you go back in time, this could be called a coincidence, not due to language contact or genetic relationship, though it's far from an exact match. Other than that I think the best hope is to go for simple systems. There might be a language out in the Pacific Ocean that has re-evolved a voicing contrast and can therefore be matched with Japanese. Perhaps if prenasalized stops are considered to be phonemically identical with plain voiced stops it'll be easier. (Old Japanese had prenasalized stops.)
And now Sunàqʷa the Sea Lamprey with our weather report:
Re: Coincidentally Identical Phonologies
In a broad sense, the Northwest Caucasian Languages wouldn't be too out of place in the Pacific Northwest. While most PNW languages lack voicing distinctions, Coast Tsimshian (for example) has it.
"But if of ships I now should sing, what ship would come to me,
What ship would bear me ever back across so wide a Sea?”
What ship would bear me ever back across so wide a Sea?”
Re: Coincidentally Identical Phonologies
I often mix them up if I only hear a short snippet. Greek to me, sounds like European Spanish but with fewer recognisable words and with a lot of [ç], [ps] and with [is] at the end of words.Publipis wrote:Spanish to Greek is a fairly close match, though the languages sound quite different to the ear.
Glossing Abbreviations: COMP = comparative, C = complementiser, ACS / ICS = accessible / inaccessible, GDV = gerundive, SPEC / NSPC = specific / non-specific
________
MY MUSIC
________
MY MUSIC
- Nortaneous
- Sumerul
- Posts: 4544
- Joined: Mon Apr 13, 2009 1:52 am
- Location: the Imperial Corridor
Re: Coincidentally Identical Phonologies
I am not completely convinced that German didn't come to Europe from somewhere in the Pacific.
Then again, Austronesian and Papuan languages are the most similar to European ones in general, with the important difference that Papuan languages often prenasalize their voiced plosives and Austronesian doesn't always have a voice distinction.
It's easier to find a set of rare and salient characteristics that all show up in two different places, like bizarre consonant clusters and implosives in Tsou and Khmer or an unusual rhotic and a strange vowel system full of diphthongs in English and Mandarin.
Then again, Austronesian and Papuan languages are the most similar to European ones in general, with the important difference that Papuan languages often prenasalize their voiced plosives and Austronesian doesn't always have a voice distinction.
It's easier to find a set of rare and salient characteristics that all show up in two different places, like bizarre consonant clusters and implosives in Tsou and Khmer or an unusual rhotic and a strange vowel system full of diphthongs in English and Mandarin.
Siöö jandeng raiglin zåbei tandiüłåd;
nää džunnfin kukuch vklaivei sivei tåd.
Chei. Chei. Chei. Chei. Chei. Chei. Chei.
nää džunnfin kukuch vklaivei sivei tåd.
Chei. Chei. Chei. Chei. Chei. Chei. Chei.
-
- Lebom
- Posts: 168
- Joined: Thu Dec 22, 2011 1:13 pm
- Location: Ohio
Re: Coincidentally Identical Phonologies
IIRC there is a language spoken in the Chinese or Burmese highlands that has a vowel inventory almost identical to that of American English. I can't remember the name, though - I saw it on the forum here a while ago.
Re: Coincidentally Identical Phonologies
Are you counting phonotactics, or only phoneme inventories?
Re: Coincidentally Identical Phonologies
I thought there was one that was linked some time ago that was West African, rhotic is an approximant, /e o/ are diphthongized, and a sample of speech sounds basically like nonsense English words. It's possible I'm confusing that for what you're thinking of, though.Porphyrogenitos wrote:IIRC there is a language spoken in the Chinese or Burmese highlands that has a vowel inventory almost identical to that of American English. I can't remember the name, though - I saw it on the forum here a while ago.
This is an important question. If you're just looking at a table of phonemes, it probably won't be too difficult. Include phonotactics, allophony, and distribution and it's going to be much harder.Neon Fox wrote:Are you counting phonotactics, or only phoneme inventories?
- Nortaneous
- Sumerul
- Posts: 4544
- Joined: Mon Apr 13, 2009 1:52 am
- Location: the Imperial Corridor
Re: Coincidentally Identical Phonologies
Those two languages are Angami (or maybe Pochuri, but if you thought it was African it's probably Angami, which has /pf bv/ everywhere) and Sorbung.
Sorbung's vowel inventory: /a aː e eː o oː i iː ʉ ʉː u uː/ [ɐ aː ɛ ei ɔ ou ɪ iː ʉ ʉː ʊ uː].
Sorbung's vowel inventory: /a aː e eː o oː i iː ʉ ʉː u uː/ [ɐ aː ɛ ei ɔ ou ɪ iː ʉ ʉː ʊ uː].
Siöö jandeng raiglin zåbei tandiüłåd;
nää džunnfin kukuch vklaivei sivei tåd.
Chei. Chei. Chei. Chei. Chei. Chei. Chei.
nää džunnfin kukuch vklaivei sivei tåd.
Chei. Chei. Chei. Chei. Chei. Chei. Chei.
- Yaali Annar
- Lebom
- Posts: 93
- Joined: Thu Sep 08, 2005 10:25 am
Re: Coincidentally Identical Phonologies
Proto-Dravidian have bunch of PoA, no fricatives, and voicing distinction... just like stereotypical australian languages.
Proto-Bantu is also reconstructed without fricatives too, but it has voicing distinction.
Proto-Bantu is also reconstructed without fricatives too, but it has voicing distinction.
Re: Coincidentally Identical Phonologies
I was surprised to see that German and Hebrew have fairly similar phoneme inventories—apart from some minor things…
swartalmo.net
just another language related weblog
just another language related weblog
- Yaali Annar
- Lebom
- Posts: 93
- Joined: Thu Sep 08, 2005 10:25 am
Re: Coincidentally Identical Phonologies
As far as Jewish language goes Yiddish is the one most similar with German.Gaspard wrote:I was surprised to see that German and Hebrew have fairly similar phoneme inventories—apart from some minor things…
- Hallow XIII
- Avisaru
- Posts: 846
- Joined: Sun Nov 04, 2012 3:40 pm
- Location: Under Heaven
Re: Coincidentally Identical Phonologies
This is not at all surprising if you consider the history of modern Hebrew. The language was artificially revived and initially spoken exclusively as an L2, mostly by German Ashkenazi jews.Gaspard wrote:I was surprised to see that German and Hebrew have fairly similar phoneme inventories—apart from some minor things…
As for the OP's question: If by identical you mean "phoneme charts with the exact same symbols", it's pretty unlikely because of differing linguistic traditions and a certain tendency to overspecify segments in a phonological analysis. If you're looking for languages that have the same set of segmental contrasts and are willing to overlook phonetic differences, then you might have more luck -- I'm not sure to what extent you're going to find pairs of true coincidences as opposed to languages from a given linguistic area though.
陳第 wrote:蓋時有古今,地有南北;字有更革,音有轉移,亦勢所必至。
Read all about my excellent conlangsR.Rusanov wrote:seks istiyorum
sex want-PRS-1sg
Basic Conlanging Advice
Re: Coincidentally Identical Phonologies
Yeah and its really tempting to connect this with the new evidence that sailors from India settled Australia around 2500 BC, right around the time Proto-Pama-Nyungan was spreading itself around the whole continent, but it just doesnt quite fit right. For one thing, there's obviously no shared language family, and 2500BC really isnt a long time ago. PIE is probably older than that. So where's proto-Pama-Dravidian?Yaali Annar wrote:Proto-Dravidian have bunch of PoA, no fricatives, and voicing distinction... just like stereotypical australian languages.
The common answer is that it wasnt Dravidians who sailed over, but a now-lost language family with a very similar phonology, which also influenced Dravidian. But who are these people that had the military might to conquer Australia but couldnt stand up to the Dravidians? I can still think of some more ideas, but each one of them has many weaknesses. It may be that it is all just a huge coincidence that the only language families in the entire world with that exact type of phonological setup are unrelated even though there is evidence that in recorded history speakers of one family migrated to live with speakers of the other.
And now Sunàqʷa the Sea Lamprey with our weather report:
- WeepingElf
- Smeric
- Posts: 1630
- Joined: Wed Mar 08, 2006 5:00 pm
- Location: Braunschweig, Germany
- Contact:
Re: Coincidentally Identical Phonologies
Which of course proves the existence of LemuriaYaali Annar wrote:Proto-Dravidian have bunch of PoA, no fricatives, and voicing distinction... just like stereotypical australian languages.
But more seriously, this has been noticed by real linguists, too. There is indeed genetic evidence of an immigration into Australia from India about 4000 years ago, which coincides with the introduction of the dingo and a number of cultural innovations in Australia, and these people may just as well have brought Proto-Pama-Nyungan to Australia. And if PN originated in India, it may have been in a kind of Sprachbund situation with Proto-Dravidian, or even share a common ancestor.
But while Dravidian and Australian languages are similar in their consonant inventories, the vowels are different. PD had */i e a o u/ plus phonemic length, while the stereotypical Australian vowel inventory is just /a i u/ and nothing else.
...brought to you by the Weeping Elf
Tha cvastam émi cvastam santham amal phelsa. -- Friedrich Schiller
ESTAR-3SG:P human-OBJ only human-OBJ true-OBJ REL-LOC play-3SG:A
Tha cvastam émi cvastam santham amal phelsa. -- Friedrich Schiller
ESTAR-3SG:P human-OBJ only human-OBJ true-OBJ REL-LOC play-3SG:A
Re: Coincidentally Identical Phonologies
Actually length contrast is quite widespread in Australia: http://i.imgur.com/biJoGF4.png
Not that it matters too much one way or the other. Length is easy enough to loose and reinvent and both /a e i o u/ and /a i u/ are too common systems to show relatedness. A relation between Dravidian and the Australian languages still seems far fetched but it makes you wonder what the linguistic landscape looked like in the south Asia before the families now dominating it took over.
Not that it matters too much one way or the other. Length is easy enough to loose and reinvent and both /a e i o u/ and /a i u/ are too common systems to show relatedness. A relation between Dravidian and the Australian languages still seems far fetched but it makes you wonder what the linguistic landscape looked like in the south Asia before the families now dominating it took over.
Most of the Australian continent is terrain that doesn't lend itself to empire building. Newcomers could have spread with no trouble just by having a couple of new technological innovations with them.Publipis wrote: But who are these people that had the military might to conquer Australia but couldnt stand up to the Dravidians?
- Salmoneus
- Sanno
- Posts: 3197
- Joined: Thu Jan 15, 2004 5:00 pm
- Location: One of the dark places of the world
Re: Coincidentally Identical Phonologies
Aren't the facts backward from what we'd expect if PN were Indian in origin?
If PNs came from India, where did they land? Presumably not on the northwest coast, since this is the only place that's reliably NOT PN. While they could have landed there, gone through the current non-PN territory and then expanded, why wouldn't they have expanded when they first arrived?
Presumably then they landed on the west coast and moved east. But the west is not where there is most diversity in PN. OK, that could be due to the terrain, or later expansions, but it's not a good sign.
And why did the PN speakers expand so widely? Presumably they had some substantial cultural advantages. But why did Indians have cultural advantages specifically useful in the desert - but that weren't advantageous in the northwest?
Whereas if we look at it the other way, we have one group on the northern edge of the desert, among many, that developed some advantage and then expanded across the desert to the south, leaving beside some potentially-related sister languages in the north. This would look like a very normal sort of expansion. It would still be a bit odd that multiple groups of PN-speakers had then crossed the mountains to the eastern coast independently, leaving no native groups... but that's a problem no matter what, isn't it?
If PNs came from India, where did they land? Presumably not on the northwest coast, since this is the only place that's reliably NOT PN. While they could have landed there, gone through the current non-PN territory and then expanded, why wouldn't they have expanded when they first arrived?
Presumably then they landed on the west coast and moved east. But the west is not where there is most diversity in PN. OK, that could be due to the terrain, or later expansions, but it's not a good sign.
And why did the PN speakers expand so widely? Presumably they had some substantial cultural advantages. But why did Indians have cultural advantages specifically useful in the desert - but that weren't advantageous in the northwest?
Whereas if we look at it the other way, we have one group on the northern edge of the desert, among many, that developed some advantage and then expanded across the desert to the south, leaving beside some potentially-related sister languages in the north. This would look like a very normal sort of expansion. It would still be a bit odd that multiple groups of PN-speakers had then crossed the mountains to the eastern coast independently, leaving no native groups... but that's a problem no matter what, isn't it?
Blog: [url]http://vacuouswastrel.wordpress.com/[/url]
But the river tripped on her by and by, lapping
as though her heart was brook: Why, why, why! Weh, O weh
I'se so silly to be flowing but I no canna stay!
But the river tripped on her by and by, lapping
as though her heart was brook: Why, why, why! Weh, O weh
I'se so silly to be flowing but I no canna stay!
Re: Coincidentally Identical Phonologies
If there is some concrete connection between Pama Nyungan and Dravidian, it's unlikely that there weren't any other languages within this same areal or genetic group. Such group could have been spread quite far in the south Asia and there's no pressing linguistic reason why Pama Nyungan would have to be derived directly from the Indian subcontinent and not just from somewhere in the Malay archipelago.
The internal diversity of Macro Pama Nyungan would actually be in line with the hypothesis that this family represents a different migration into Australia from the rest of the north Australian languages as it's also highest in the north. Though, it's also possible that the rest of Australia has just experienced strong linguistic levelling masking away the ancient spread patterns.
But why do we specifically try to compare Pama Nyungan with Dravidian? If the motivator is the similarity between the phonologies, I don't see why the north Australian families would be any worse candidates.
The internal diversity of Macro Pama Nyungan would actually be in line with the hypothesis that this family represents a different migration into Australia from the rest of the north Australian languages as it's also highest in the north. Though, it's also possible that the rest of Australia has just experienced strong linguistic levelling masking away the ancient spread patterns.
But why do we specifically try to compare Pama Nyungan with Dravidian? If the motivator is the similarity between the phonologies, I don't see why the north Australian families would be any worse candidates.
- WeepingElf
- Smeric
- Posts: 1630
- Joined: Wed Mar 08, 2006 5:00 pm
- Location: Braunschweig, Germany
- Contact:
Re: Coincidentally Identical Phonologies
Sure. There would have been other languages of that kind; alas, we don't find any. AFAIK, there is nothing like a Dravidian-style or PN-style consonant inventory anywhere between India and Australia.gach wrote:If there is some concrete connection between Pama Nyungan and Dravidian, it's unlikely that there weren't any other languages within this same areal or genetic group. Such group could have been spread quite far in the south Asia and there's no pressing linguistic reason why Pama Nyungan would have to be derived directly from the Indian subcontinent and not just from somewhere in the Malay archipelago.
I don't know about the actual time depth of (Macro-)Pama-Nyungan. Is it actually compatible with the immigration scenario discussed here?gach wrote:The internal diversity of Macro Pama Nyungan would actually be in line with the hypothesis that this family represents a different migration into Australia from the rest of the north Australian languages as it's also highest in the north. Though, it's also possible that the rest of Australia has just experienced strong linguistic levelling masking away the ancient spread patterns.
Point taken. These consonant inventories are also found in many non-PN languages, this is true. Yet, the whole set of Australian languages is too diverse to descend from a common ancestor that wass spoken about 2500 BC, or we could reconstruct Proto-Australian, which we can't.gach wrote:But why do we specifically try to compare Pama Nyungan with Dravidian? If the motivator is the similarity between the phonologies, I don't see why the north Australian families would be any worse candidates.
At any rate, there is no reconstructible "Proto-Dravidian-Pama-Nyungan", so if Pama-Nyungan is related to Dravidian, that relationship would have to be very deep, well beyond 2500 BC. Apparently, Elamite seems to be a better candidate for the nearest known kin of Dravidian, and that doesn't show a "Dravidian-Australian"-type consonant inventory at all!
...brought to you by the Weeping Elf
Tha cvastam émi cvastam santham amal phelsa. -- Friedrich Schiller
ESTAR-3SG:P human-OBJ only human-OBJ true-OBJ REL-LOC play-3SG:A
Tha cvastam émi cvastam santham amal phelsa. -- Friedrich Schiller
ESTAR-3SG:P human-OBJ only human-OBJ true-OBJ REL-LOC play-3SG:A
Re: Coincidentally Identical Phonologies
Even more so, the phonological consistency across Australia shows that it's been actively maintained through language contact. If that's the case, wouldn't it be more likely to assume that it represents an equilibrium point that's a native Australian innovation.WeepingElf wrote:Apparently, Elamite seems to be a better candidate for the nearest known kin of Dravidian, and that doesn't show a "Dravidian-Australian"-type consonant inventory at all!
- WeepingElf
- Smeric
- Posts: 1630
- Joined: Wed Mar 08, 2006 5:00 pm
- Location: Braunschweig, Germany
- Contact:
Re: Coincidentally Identical Phonologies
Yes. The similarity between Dravidian and Australian consonant inventories probably is nothing but an amusing coincidence. Especially given the fact that the Australian languages show no signs of affinity to Dravidian in any other regard.gach wrote:Even more so, the phonological consistency across Australia shows that it's been actively maintained through language contact. If that's the case, wouldn't it be more likely to assume that it represents an equilibrium point that's a native Australian innovation.WeepingElf wrote:Apparently, Elamite seems to be a better candidate for the nearest known kin of Dravidian, and that doesn't show a "Dravidian-Australian"-type consonant inventory at all!
...brought to you by the Weeping Elf
Tha cvastam émi cvastam santham amal phelsa. -- Friedrich Schiller
ESTAR-3SG:P human-OBJ only human-OBJ true-OBJ REL-LOC play-3SG:A
Tha cvastam émi cvastam santham amal phelsa. -- Friedrich Schiller
ESTAR-3SG:P human-OBJ only human-OBJ true-OBJ REL-LOC play-3SG:A