Hapax Phonoumena

Discussion of natural languages, or language in general.
User avatar
Xephyr
Avisaru
Avisaru
Posts: 821
Joined: Sat May 03, 2003 3:04 pm

Hapax Phonoumena

Post by Xephyr »

I just saw this in Catherine Callaghan's Northern Sierra Miwok Dictionary:
/š/ is a voiceless palatal spirant, found in the exclamation ʔiš·o·! 'Scat' and an occasional loan word from English.
That implies that before the other words were loaned from English, /š/ was found in only that one word. I can think of one other example off-hand of a phoneme in a language that occurs in only one morpheme-- in Crow, the glottal stop phoneme occurs only in the interrogative marker (conveniently written <?>)-- but I know I've seen other examples, too.

It is a somewhat interesting phenomenon. Can any of you guys think of any more examples?
"It will not come by waiting for it. It will not be said, 'Here it is,' or 'There it is.' Rather, the Kingdom of the Father is spread out upon the earth, and men do not see it."
The Gospel of Thomas

Vijay
Smeric
Smeric
Posts: 2244
Joined: Sat Feb 06, 2016 3:25 pm
Location: Austin, TX, USA

Re: Hapax Phonoumena

Post by Vijay »

In Malayalam, fricatives in general are limited to loanwords. The only exception to that I can think of is in the word [ɕɛˈɾi] 'okay, correct, right'.

User avatar
Nortaneous
Sumerul
Sumerul
Posts: 4544
Joined: Mon Apr 13, 2009 1:52 am
Location: the Imperial Corridor

Re: Hapax Phonoumena

Post by Nortaneous »

AmE /eə/.

Some Austronesian languages, according to Blust:
In Bintulu the general marker of negation is ã [ʔã]. Since other words that begin with a- invariably have an oral vowel, the nasality of the negative marker cannot be explained as conditioned. However, in a field corpus of nearly 800 available lexical items no other examples of unconditioned vowel nasality are known. It might be argued that many languages (English among them) have colloquial negative markers with deviant phonetic properties such as morpheme-specific vowel nasality, but a second example from northern Sarawak cannot be explained in this way. Miri, spoken near the mouth of the Baram River, has the minimal pair haaw ‘rafter’ : hããw ‘2sg’. Here vowel nasality may have arisen through the process of ‘rhinoglottophilia’ (Matisoff 1975), in which glottal and pharyngeal consonants lower the velum, with concomitant vowel nasality. But in this case the conditioning would have to be morpheme-specific, since h reflects *k in both words (PMP *kasaw ‘rafter’, *kahu ‘2sg’). Again, vowel nasality in this form appears to be unique, and the question of how to represent it phonemically presents problems.
Mako:
Mako has a seven-vowel system consisting of the phonemes /i/, /u/, /e/, /o/, /a/, /ə/ and /ɨ/ (nasalisation is also contrastive). However, the /ə/ phoneme appears exclusively in the past tense suffix -tə. It doesn’t appear to be an allophone: every other vowel occurs word-finally after -t, e.g. in bamatɨ ‘stop’, bamati ‘stop!’, bamato ‘it will stop’, bamata ‘it stops’, bamate ‘stop! (reported imperative)’ and õpetu ‘outside’, and stress is always word-final.
Latin:
My Latin dictionary says it (/eu/) appears in ceu ‘as’, heu ‘oh!’, neu = nēve ‘and not, or not’, neuter ‘neither of the two’ and seu = sīve ‘or if’. So they’re all exclamations or shortenings except for ceu, and I would imagine ceu is a shortening of an unattested form.
The Latin diphthongs ei and ui are also very rare: ei appears in ei = hei ‘ah!’ and Pompei, the vocative of the gens Pompēius. (The city is Pompēiī.) ui appears in hui ‘ha!’ huic, dat. sg. of hic ‘this’, and cui, dat. sg. of quis ‘who’ and quī ‘what’.
Dahalo:
Several phonemes can be shown to be recent intrusions into the language through loanwords:[3]
/z/ is only found in recent loans from Bantu and can be nativized as /d̪/.
/tʃʼ/ is only found in loanwords from Swahili.
/ʃ/ is only found in loanwords from Swahili and Somali.
Additionally, several consonants are marginal in their occurrence. Five are only attested in a single root:
/ⁿd̠ʷ/
/ᶮdʒ/, in /kípuᶮdʒu/ 'place where maize is seasoned'
/ᵑɡʷ/, in /háᵑɡʷaraᵑɡʷára/ 'centipede'
/ɬʷ/, in /ɬʷaʜ-/ 'to pinch'.
/j/, in /jáːjo/ 'mother'.
Less than five examples each are known of /ᵑʇˀʷ, tʃ, tsʼ, tʃʼ, kʷʼ, dɮ, ʄ, ⁿd̠, ⁿdz/.
Siöö jandeng raiglin zåbei tandiüłåd;
nää džunnfin kukuch vklaivei sivei tåd.
Chei. Chei. Chei. Chei. Chei. Chei. Chei.

vokzhen
Avisaru
Avisaru
Posts: 352
Joined: Sat Aug 09, 2014 3:43 pm
Location: Iowa

Re: Hapax Phonoumena

Post by vokzhen »

Do almost-but-not-quite single instances count?

Chechen and Ingush have a voiceless trill in the numbers seven /vʷor̥/ and eight /bar̥/, found nowhere else in the language. The Bats cognates are /vorɬ barɬ/. Ingush apparently also has [o:] that pops up in Russian loans (regularly replaced with native /uo/ when asked to repeat), plus in /joax/ "say" when used as a quotative or hearsay evidential [jo:x]. This occasionally extends to a few other words with /oa/. The author of the grammar calls it "not even a marginal phoneme" but that it could be one in the future.

Archi has a couple words with /ʟ̝/, /náʟ̝dut/ "blue/unripe" and /k͡ʟ̝̊ʼéʟ̝dut/ "crooked." Adjectives very often end in -tːut, -dut, -t:u, etc, so I presume it's an odd reflex when combined with /naˤk͡ʟ̝̊ʼ/ "be.blue" /k͡ʟ̝̊ʼek͡ʟ̝̊ʼ/ "be.crooked." /ʁˤʷ/ is only in three words, /íʁʷˤdut/ "heavy" /ʁʷˤálqˤi/ "fog, light north wind" /ʁʷˤárbos/ "crack of a voice." At a glance, it looks like some of the other labialized sounds are extremely rare as well, though I haven't checked meticulously.

Qiangic languages seem to have a number of vowels that are limited to 1-3 lexemes a piece, though part of that might be incomplete data. Most also have /h/ or /ɦ/ limited to a couple items.

Japhug has /y/ only in /qaɟy/ "fish." The cognate in Tshobdun/Cǎodēng is /qɐɟwɛʔ/.

----
Smeric
Smeric
Posts: 1418
Joined: Tue Feb 15, 2011 11:15 pm

Re: Hapax Phonoumena

Post by ---- »

The only native word in Levei-Drehet with /b/ is /bo/, meaning 'water'.

zompist
Boardlord
Boardlord
Posts: 3368
Joined: Thu Sep 12, 2002 8:26 pm
Location: In the den
Contact:

Re: Hapax Phonoumena

Post by zompist »

English [ʇ] in tsk tsk.

Sanskrit /ḷ/ occurs only in one lexeme, kḷp- 'be fit, arrange'.

User avatar
kodé
Lebom
Lebom
Posts: 175
Joined: Sun Apr 16, 2006 8:25 pm
Location: Trojan Country

Re: Hapax Phonoumena

Post by kodé »

Xephyr wrote:I just saw this in Catherine Callaghan's Northern Sierra Miwok Dictionary:
[offtopic]are you interested in sierra miwok? i've been looking at sylvia broadbent's grammar of southern sierra miwok and i'd love to correspond about it[/offtopic]

If we're counting interjections and other more purely discourse-y items, English also has /?/ and /@~/ in /?@~?@~/ "uh-uh" and /?@~h@~/ "uh-huh" (apologies if you don't like the SAMPA).
linguoboy wrote:
GrinningManiac wrote:Local pronunciation - /ˈtoʊ.stə/
Ah, so now I know where Towcester pastries originated! Cheers.

vokzhen
Avisaru
Avisaru
Posts: 352
Joined: Sat Aug 09, 2014 3:43 pm
Location: Iowa

Re: Hapax Phonoumena

Post by vokzhen »

"Huh. / Huh?" and hee-haw (donkey onomatopoeia) are also obligatorily nasalized, at least for me.

Alon
Sanci
Sanci
Posts: 34
Joined: Mon Apr 18, 2016 2:51 pm

Re: Hapax Phonoumena

Post by Alon »

Arabic /ɫ/ only appears in Allah's name, no?

hwhatting
Smeric
Smeric
Posts: 2315
Joined: Fri Sep 13, 2002 2:49 am
Location: Bonn, Germany

Re: Hapax Phonoumena

Post by hwhatting »

As zomp and kodé have pointed out, interjections often contain phonemes that don't show up elswhere in a language, or violate restrictions for those phonemes. I think that can explain at least some of the cases - e.g. the negation marker or past tense marker mentioned may originally have been interjections.

User avatar
2+3 clusivity
Avisaru
Avisaru
Posts: 454
Joined: Fri Mar 16, 2012 5:34 pm

Re: Hapax Phonoumena

Post by 2+3 clusivity »

vokzhen wrote:"Huh. / Huh?" and hee-haw (donkey onomatopoeia) are also obligatorily nasalized, at least for me.
That struck a cord with me. It seems that the following broadly transcribed expressions/exclamations contrast for me --

/hə̃Ɂ˧˥/ or perhaps /h̩̃Ɂ˧˥/ (question word, unable to hear, inviting a repeat of the prior statement)

/həɁ˧˩˧/ or perhaps /h̩Ɂ˧˩˧/ (tentative agreement, indeed, etc.)

/əɁ˧˩.həɁ˩˥/ or perhaps /əɁ˧˩.h̩Ɂ˩˥/ (stronger affirmative, agreement; the faster the rise on the second syllable the more conclusive or firm the agreement is)

I am not great at transcribing tone or intonation, but in these expression it is definitely important. Additionally, all three can be made with a closed mouth in which case all seem obligatorily nasalized. For the former two, the tone/intonation/whatever then becomes the contrastive factor.

Onomatopoetic words and exclamations (“shush” to a cat above seems like a prime example) appear belong to a class or classes of words that do not generally fit into the phoneme inventory of languages.
linguoboy wrote:So that's what it looks like when the master satirist is moistened by his own moutarde.

User avatar
Nortaneous
Sumerul
Sumerul
Posts: 4544
Joined: Mon Apr 13, 2009 1:52 am
Location: the Imperial Corridor

Re: Hapax Phonoumena

Post by Nortaneous »

Ubykh /h/ is only found in interjections, loans, and /hənda/ 'now'.
Siöö jandeng raiglin zåbei tandiüłåd;
nää džunnfin kukuch vklaivei sivei tåd.
Chei. Chei. Chei. Chei. Chei. Chei. Chei.

Travis B.
Sumerul
Sumerul
Posts: 3570
Joined: Mon Jun 20, 2005 12:47 pm
Location: Milwaukee, US

Re: Hapax Phonoumena

Post by Travis B. »

I have [nɛ̃(ː)] as a negative word (I don't know how to spell it, some would spell it <nah>, but <nah> to me is [na(ː)]), and it has a clearly phonemic nasalized vowel on it.
Dibotahamdn duthma jallni agaynni ra hgitn lakrhmi.
Amuhawr jalla vowa vta hlakrhi hdm duthmi xaja.
Irdro. Irdro. Irdro. Irdro. Irdro. Irdro. Irdro.

Vijay
Smeric
Smeric
Posts: 2244
Joined: Sat Feb 06, 2016 3:25 pm
Location: Austin, TX, USA

Re: Hapax Phonoumena

Post by Vijay »

Travis, how do you pronounce <naw>?
kodé wrote:If we're counting interjections and other more purely discourse-y items, English also has /?/ and /@~/ in /?@~?@~/ "uh-uh" and /?@~h@~/ "uh-huh" (apologies if you don't like the SAMPA).
I thought it was pretty common in English to have glottal stops before vowels...

I'm not really sure whether this counts, but I had a professor who worked on Remo, a Munda language spoken in eastern India (Odisha). He said that in Remo, when you want to form a yes/no question, you stick the interrogative marker [ki] (borrowed from Oriya, I think) to the end of the sentence, but apparently, you pronounce it so it sounds pretty much like a bird screeching. I doubt there is any other context in Remo where you'd say something that sounds like a bird screeching. :P A guy I went to grad school with also pointed out that (some variety/ies of?) Mixtec has a super-low tone that's also only used in a certain context (I think he might have said that it was used in the same context - yes/no questions - but I forget).

Travis B.
Sumerul
Sumerul
Posts: 3570
Joined: Mon Jun 20, 2005 12:47 pm
Location: Milwaukee, US

Re: Hapax Phonoumena

Post by Travis B. »

Vijay wrote:Travis, how do you pronounce <naw>?
From the orthography I would pronounce it [nɒ(ː)], but it is not really a word in my dialect.
Dibotahamdn duthma jallni agaynni ra hgitn lakrhmi.
Amuhawr jalla vowa vta hlakrhi hdm duthmi xaja.
Irdro. Irdro. Irdro. Irdro. Irdro. Irdro. Irdro.

vokzhen
Avisaru
Avisaru
Posts: 352
Joined: Sat Aug 09, 2014 3:43 pm
Location: Iowa

Re: Hapax Phonoumena

Post by vokzhen »

2+3 clusivity wrote:[/həɁ˧˩˧/ or perhaps /h̩Ɂ˧˩˧/ (tentative agreement, indeed, etc.)

/əɁ˧˩.həɁ˩˥/ or perhaps /əɁ˧˩.h̩Ɂ˩˥/ (stronger affirmative, agreement; the faster the rise on the second syllable the more conclusive or firm the agreement is)
I think it's interesting you don't nasalize these, if I do that it sounds like I'm talking with a cold. Also do you really allow them totally voiceless? Even my super-short ones have a brief period of (creaky?) voicing.

opipik
Avisaru
Avisaru
Posts: 823
Joined: Tue Apr 07, 2015 3:42 am

Re: Hapax Phonoumena

Post by opipik »

In Hoyahoya, /s/ occurs only in the word /sa/ "bone". All other fricatives are spelled with <h>, so /s/ is spelled <sh>.

User avatar
Ser
Smeric
Smeric
Posts: 1542
Joined: Sat Jul 19, 2008 1:55 am
Location: Vancouver, British Columbia / Colombie Britannique, Canada

Re: Hapax Phonoumena

Post by Ser »

Spanish /uj/ only appears in muy 'very', and, in some dialects, cuy 'guinea pig' (plural: cuis or cuyes). Some speakers report having /wi/ for these words, but for me muy and fui 'I was' definitely don't rhyme.

Some male Latin Americans have [ˈsə] as an alternative pronunciation of the interjection 'yes', but not the adverb 'EMPH' (sí lo hizo 'he did do it'). [ə] is nothing surprising for "highland" dialects, but the thing is that this [ə] for the interjection is stressed, and often enlongated in celebrations (i.e. [sə:::]). On the Internet you generally see it spelled "seee".

Mexicans and Central Americans have [ˈbɾuʃo, ˈβ-] as an alternative pronunciation of brujo 'shaman' (also applies to bruja 'witch', but I've never heard it for brujería nor embrujado). [ʃ] occurs elsewhere in these dialects in words from English and Nahuatl / Pipil, as well as the interjection ¡osh! 'urgh! (expressing disgust)', but brujo is its only instance in native vocabulary outside interjections. If you think I'm making this up, here's an attestation from the movie Bruce Almighty: at 2:15 you can hear this is some bru[ʃ]o men, ¡vámonos! 'this one is a shaman, guys, let's get out of here!'

Male Salvadoran Spanish speakers sometimes pronounce the sentence-final particle ¿va? 'don't you think?' with [ɑ]: [bɑ]. (This particle also has the forms veá, vedá (for old speakers), and verdad). Va is sometimes also used as an interjection meaning 'alright!, good!', equivalent to ¡vale! in some other dialects.

In Taiwanese standard Mandarin, the triphthong /jaj/ only occurs in one word: 崖 yái 'cliff' (pronounced yá in PRC standard Mandarin).
Alon wrote:Arabic /ɫ/ only appears in Allah's name, no?
Correct.



Almost every language I've studied seems to has at least one hapax phonoumenon: English yeah (mentioned by Nortaneous above), Spanish muy/cuy, (Taiwanese) Mandarin yái, Arabic ’allāh, Latin cui/huic. It seems like something that should be unremarkable, except linguists don't talk about this.

I can't think of anything good for French, but an unpredictable long /øː/ [øː] is reported by le Trésor de la langue française to occur in less than 10 words (jeûne 'fasting' (contrasting with jeune 'young'), meule 'grindstone', émeute 'riot', veule 'sluggish/lazy [person]', neume 'neume').

8Deer
Lebom
Lebom
Posts: 122
Joined: Thu Dec 02, 2010 12:48 am

Re: Hapax Phonoumena

Post by 8Deer »

If we're including loanwords, than the affricate /dʒ/ occurs in Halkomelem only in the word kinjaj meaning "Englishman" (I think this is may be from Chinook Jargon, ultimately from English "King George").

Very interesting topic, I'll have to see if I can dig up any more.

User avatar
Frislander
Avisaru
Avisaru
Posts: 836
Joined: Mon Feb 29, 2016 6:34 am
Location: The North

Re: Hapax Phonoumena

Post by Frislander »

And while we're in the PNW, Makah contains only one word with g, x̌igi·dit "Clallam bay", a borrowing from Klallam (surprise surprise). The other voiced stops are the denasalised b and d. The nasals do occur in a few words, though, such as na·ni· "grizzly bear".
https://frislander.tumblr.com/

First known on here as Karero

User avatar
Zaarin
Smeric
Smeric
Posts: 1136
Joined: Sun Aug 15, 2010 5:00 pm

Re: Hapax Phonoumena

Post by Zaarin »

A number of PNW languages have vowels that only appear in nonce words in ritual music (or music in general, in some cases). I don't have any of my material on hand for examples, though.
"But if of ships I now should sing, what ship would come to me,
What ship would bear me ever back across so wide a Sea?”

User avatar
Nortaneous
Sumerul
Sumerul
Posts: 4544
Joined: Mon Apr 13, 2009 1:52 am
Location: the Imperial Corridor

Re: Hapax Phonoumena

Post by Nortaneous »

Norwegian /ʉi/ only appears in the word hui, which only appears in the expression i hui og hast.
Siöö jandeng raiglin zåbei tandiüłåd;
nää džunnfin kukuch vklaivei sivei tåd.
Chei. Chei. Chei. Chei. Chei. Chei. Chei.

Magb
Lebom
Lebom
Posts: 194
Joined: Wed Aug 23, 2006 9:42 am
Location: Oslo, Norway

Re: Hapax Phonoumena

Post by Magb »

Nortaneous wrote:Norwegian /ʉi/ only appears in the word hui, which only appears in the expression i hui og hast.
I was about to point out this same word, although I would add that there's also the derived verb huie. Huie can also be pronounced [hʊɪə] (in that case typically spelled hoie, but I think it's really just the same lexeme), which is funny because [ʊɪ] also only appears in that single word in most dialects.

User avatar
Nortaneous
Sumerul
Sumerul
Posts: 4544
Joined: Mon Apr 13, 2009 1:52 am
Location: the Imperial Corridor

Re: Hapax Phonoumena

Post by Nortaneous »

Finnish /ey iy/ can be generated by the morphology (e- i- + -U), but /ey/ only appears in one root, leyhyä, and the dialectal form keyri (std. kekri), and /iy/ only appears in the place name Kiysaari and dialectal tiyris. /öi yi/, when not generated by the morphology, only appear in onomatapoeia and before /j/.
Siöö jandeng raiglin zåbei tandiüłåd;
nää džunnfin kukuch vklaivei sivei tåd.
Chei. Chei. Chei. Chei. Chei. Chei. Chei.

User avatar
Alces
Lebom
Lebom
Posts: 87
Joined: Sun Jan 03, 2010 6:09 pm
Location: Merseyside, England, UK
Contact:

Re: Hapax Phonoumena

Post by Alces »

Amuzgo has a syllabic, prenasalized, voiced velarized bilabial trill which appears exclusively in the word [ʃa˥m̩ˠʙˠ˥] 'antlion'. (The only other phonemic syllabic consonant is /n̩/, which can be pronounced with any place of articulation, or as a lateral, depending on the consonants that follow it. The non-syllabic nasal phonemes are /m/, /n/ and /nʲ/.)

Post Reply