Sound Change Quickie Thread

Substantial postings about constructed languages and constructed worlds in general. Good place to mention your own or evaluate someone else's. Put quick questions in C&C Quickies instead.
Knit Tie
Lebom
Lebom
Posts: 101
Joined: Thu Oct 13, 2016 2:43 am
Location: Russia, Saint-Petersburg

Re: Sound Change Quickie Thread

Post by Knit Tie »

Would it be possible, in some hypothetical future variety of English, for methathesis to occur thay would switch syllabic sonoranit into the coda of the preceding syllable, e.g.:

castle /kʰæsɫ̩/ → /kʰæɫs/
nation /neɪ̯ʃn̩/ → /neɪ̯nʃ/
acre /eɪ̯ʔkɻ̩/ → /eɪ̯ɻʔk/

Or should I go for something more indirect, e.g.:

castle /kʰæsɫ̩/ → /kʰæsɫə/ → /kʰæɫsə/ → /kʰæɫs/
or castle /kʰæsɫ̩/ → /kʰæsəɫ/ → /kʰæsɫə/ → /'kʰæɫsə/ → /kʰæɫs/?

I've also got another question: what conditional sound changes do people here like the most? I've been trying to put some in my conlang's diachronica, but I don't know which ones to choose.

User avatar
mèþru
Smeric
Smeric
Posts: 1984
Joined: Thu Oct 29, 2015 6:44 am
Location: suburbs of Mrin
Contact:

Re: Sound Change Quickie Thread

Post by mèþru »

Metathesis is usually a sporadic change.
ìtsanso, God In The Mountain, may our names inspire the deepest feelings of fear in urkos and all his ilk, for we have saved another man from his lies! I welcome back to the feast hall kal, who will never gamble again! May the eleven gods bless him!
kårroť

User avatar
Zaarin
Smeric
Smeric
Posts: 1136
Joined: Sun Aug 15, 2010 5:00 pm

Re: Sound Change Quickie Thread

Post by Zaarin »

mèþru wrote:Metathesis is usually a sporadic change.
While I can't think of examples off the top of my head, it can be regular.

@Knit Tie: I find that reasonably plausible myself.
"But if of ships I now should sing, what ship would come to me,
What ship would bear me ever back across so wide a Sea?”

Knit Tie
Lebom
Lebom
Posts: 101
Joined: Thu Oct 13, 2016 2:43 am
Location: Russia, Saint-Petersburg

Re: Sound Change Quickie Thread

Post by Knit Tie »

Zaarin wrote:
mèþru wrote:Metathesis is usually a sporadic change.
While I can't think of examples off the top of my head, it can be regular.
Slavic liquid metathesis was regular as all hell.
@Knit Tie: I find that reasonably plausible myself.
Even the top version, without any schwas?

User avatar
Zaarin
Smeric
Smeric
Posts: 1136
Joined: Sun Aug 15, 2010 5:00 pm

Re: Sound Change Quickie Thread

Post by Zaarin »

Knit Tie wrote:
Zaarin wrote:
mèþru wrote:Metathesis is usually a sporadic change.
While I can't think of examples off the top of my head, it can be regular.
Slavic liquid metathesis was regular as all hell.
@Knit Tie: I find that reasonably plausible myself.
Even the top version, without any schwas?
Sure. I understand the motivation for the schwas: it makes the resonants non-syllabic. But the phonemic status of syllabic resonants in English is sufficiently blurry that I don't have a problem buying that they become non-syllabic when moved to an environment where English does not usually have syllabic resonants (i.e., after vowels).
"But if of ships I now should sing, what ship would come to me,
What ship would bear me ever back across so wide a Sea?”

User avatar
Nortaneous
Sumerul
Sumerul
Posts: 4544
Joined: Mon Apr 13, 2009 1:52 am
Location: the Imperial Corridor

Re: Sound Change Quickie Thread

Post by Nortaneous »

I would expect vocalization.
Siöö jandeng raiglin zåbei tandiüłåd;
nää džunnfin kukuch vklaivei sivei tåd.
Chei. Chei. Chei. Chei. Chei. Chei. Chei.

Knit Tie
Lebom
Lebom
Posts: 101
Joined: Thu Oct 13, 2016 2:43 am
Location: Russia, Saint-Petersburg

Re: Sound Change Quickie Thread

Post by Knit Tie »

Nortaneous wrote:I would expect vocalization.
Yeah, that's probably the most plausible option. I do wonder, though, what would the nasals vocalise to? Rhotic will turn into a low vowel, the lateral into a back vowel, but what about the nasals? Nasal vowels? Just /a/?

User avatar
Frislander
Avisaru
Avisaru
Posts: 836
Joined: Mon Feb 29, 2016 6:34 am
Location: The North

Re: Sound Change Quickie Thread

Post by Frislander »

Knit Tie wrote:I do wonder, though, what would the nasals vocalise to? Rhotic will turn into a low vowel, the lateral into a back vowel, but what about the nasals? Nasal vowels? Just /a/?
I guess the simple answer is "pretty much anything", I mean just look at the different results of the loss of syllabic resonants across Indo-European. I myself would be inclined towards something line a nasalised schwa, but it's really up to you.
https://frislander.tumblr.com/

First known on here as Karero

User avatar
Nortaneous
Sumerul
Sumerul
Posts: 4544
Joined: Mon Apr 13, 2009 1:52 am
Location: the Imperial Corridor

Re: Sound Change Quickie Thread

Post by Nortaneous »

-əl either merges into -əw (back when I didn't have a Gameboy but heard people talking about Pokemon I picked up that there was one called /bijdrijəw/) or becomes -uw. The rest seem stable for now, unless you're assuming nonrhoticity, which I wouldn't for future AmEng because sociolinguistics. So it's out of projecting existing trends forward and into pure conshit, so you can do whatever.
Siöö jandeng raiglin zåbei tandiüłåd;
nää džunnfin kukuch vklaivei sivei tåd.
Chei. Chei. Chei. Chei. Chei. Chei. Chei.

Travis B.
Sumerul
Sumerul
Posts: 3570
Joined: Mon Jun 20, 2005 12:47 pm
Location: Milwaukee, US

Re: Sound Change Quickie Thread

Post by Travis B. »

Here there's l-vocalization, which I've described before, and some final /n/ elision (which could be interpreted as [n̩] > [ɘ̃]), particularly before vowels, but rhoticity seems quite stable except in certain words with multiple rhotics where one of the rhotics is lost (e.g. caterpillar), which is a feature shared with much of NAE.
Dibotahamdn duthma jallni agaynni ra hgitn lakrhmi.
Amuhawr jalla vowa vta hlakrhi hdm duthmi xaja.
Irdro. Irdro. Irdro. Irdro. Irdro. Irdro. Irdro.

User avatar
WeepingElf
Smeric
Smeric
Posts: 1630
Joined: Wed Mar 08, 2006 5:00 pm
Location: Braunschweig, Germany
Contact:

Re: Sound Change Quickie Thread

Post by WeepingElf »

How could I achieve that /x/ is lost, but /h/ is preserved, and later becomes /x/? This is admittedly a weird change, one would expect /h/ to get lost easier than /x/; hence, some intermediate steps are probably necessary to do the job. All this would have to go its course in at most 2,000 years. Also, there are labialized and palatalized counterparts of /x/ and a labialized /h/. These labializations and palatalizations must be preserved. Any ideas?
...brought to you by the Weeping Elf
Tha cvastam émi cvastam santham amal phelsa. -- Friedrich Schiller
ESTAR-3SG:P human-OBJ only human-OBJ true-OBJ REL-LOC play-3SG:A

Knit Tie
Lebom
Lebom
Posts: 101
Joined: Thu Oct 13, 2016 2:43 am
Location: Russia, Saint-Petersburg

Re: Sound Change Quickie Thread

Post by Knit Tie »

@WeepingElf - Middle English had /x/ and /ç/ as allophones of /h/ in coda and lost them both or, sporadically, merged them with /f/. So perhaps you could restrict them to different positions and then just nuke the one that has /x/? If you want to preserve palatalised and labialised /x/s, I think you could just go /xʲ/ → /ç/ → /ʃ/ and /xʷ/ you can easily change into any of /p/ /b/ /f/ /v/ /w/ or even /ʍ/.

User avatar
WeepingElf
Smeric
Smeric
Posts: 1630
Joined: Wed Mar 08, 2006 5:00 pm
Location: Braunschweig, Germany
Contact:

Re: Sound Change Quickie Thread

Post by WeepingElf »

I know of the English case, but in this case, things are different - /x/ and /h/ are different, constrasting phonemes. The protolanguage has these fricatives: /f s xj x xw h/. (There is a stop series at each of these POAs except glottal.) Of these, /f/ first becomes /hw/. What should happen then is in one language that the velar fricatives drop, but the glottals survive as /h/, later to become /x/. In a sister language, the velars merge with the glottals, with the secondary articulations staying intact. (/s/ stays intact in both languages.)

BTW: If you haven't guessed it by now, what I am working on aren't really conlangs (though it has repercussions on my main conlang family); it is a hypothesis about the PIE laryngeals of mine we are currently discussing in the Great PIE Thread at L&L. The two daughter languages mentioned above are, of course, Hittite and Late PIE. People so often have good ideas about what kind of sound changes are plausible and what is attested that I thought they could say something on this, too.

BTW2: I've just got an idea. The glottal fricatives harden to glottal stops; then the velar fricatives get lost; in a third step the glottal stops become uvular stops, which yet later fricativize. Does that make sense?
...brought to you by the Weeping Elf
Tha cvastam émi cvastam santham amal phelsa. -- Friedrich Schiller
ESTAR-3SG:P human-OBJ only human-OBJ true-OBJ REL-LOC play-3SG:A

User avatar
LinguistCat
Avisaru
Avisaru
Posts: 250
Joined: Thu Apr 13, 2006 7:24 pm
Location: Off on the side

Re: Sound Change Quickie Thread

Post by LinguistCat »

Are there sound changes besides dropping the last consonant or vowel of a word that could happen to the last syllable of a word?

I was thinking since /k/ in the proto-language already voices to [g] in intervocalic positions, and there's free variation between the stop form and fricatives [x~ɣ] (voicing still dependent on environment), it would be fair to say that [ɣ] became the predominant pronunciation intervocalically, especially at the ends of words. (ETA: This would be syllable initial but in the final syllable of a word.)

Similar sound changes might be applied to the other stops but I wanted to see if it was feasible for this change specifically first. Thanks!
Last edited by LinguistCat on Wed Mar 28, 2018 7:51 pm, edited 1 time in total.
The stars are an ocean. Your breasts, are also an ocean.

Travis B.
Sumerul
Sumerul
Posts: 3570
Joined: Mon Jun 20, 2005 12:47 pm
Location: Milwaukee, US

Re: Sound Change Quickie Thread

Post by Travis B. »

Both fortition (final fortition in German, Dutch, Polish, Russian, etc.) and lenition (English s > z finally in many words) frequently occur word-finally or, more broadly, syllable-finally.
Dibotahamdn duthma jallni agaynni ra hgitn lakrhmi.
Amuhawr jalla vowa vta hlakrhi hdm duthmi xaja.
Irdro. Irdro. Irdro. Irdro. Irdro. Irdro. Irdro.

User avatar
LinguistCat
Avisaru
Avisaru
Posts: 250
Joined: Thu Apr 13, 2006 7:24 pm
Location: Off on the side

Re: Sound Change Quickie Thread

Post by LinguistCat »

Travis B. wrote:Both fortition (final fortition in German, Dutch, Polish, Russian, etc.) and lenition (English s > z finally in many words) frequently occur word-finally or, more broadly, syllable-finally.
This would be syllable initial but in the final syllable of a word. I hope that clears up what I meant.
The stars are an ocean. Your breasts, are also an ocean.

Travis B.
Sumerul
Sumerul
Posts: 3570
Joined: Mon Jun 20, 2005 12:47 pm
Location: Milwaukee, US

Re: Sound Change Quickie Thread

Post by Travis B. »

LinguistCat wrote:This would be syllable initial but in the final syllable of a word. I hope that clears up what I meant.
One could have lenition of unstressed onsets combined with an trochaic word structure where the final syllable of a polysyllabic word is always unstressed.
Dibotahamdn duthma jallni agaynni ra hgitn lakrhmi.
Amuhawr jalla vowa vta hlakrhi hdm duthmi xaja.
Irdro. Irdro. Irdro. Irdro. Irdro. Irdro. Irdro.

User avatar
LinguistCat
Avisaru
Avisaru
Posts: 250
Joined: Thu Apr 13, 2006 7:24 pm
Location: Off on the side

Re: Sound Change Quickie Thread

Post by LinguistCat »

Travis B. wrote:
LinguistCat wrote:This would be syllable initial but in the final syllable of a word. I hope that clears up what I meant.
One could have lenition of unstressed onsets combined with an trochaic word structure where the final syllable of a polysyllabic word is always unstressed.
Yes that is more than doable and should work quite nicely. Thanks.
The stars are an ocean. Your breasts, are also an ocean.

User avatar
Zaarin
Smeric
Smeric
Posts: 1136
Joined: Sun Aug 15, 2010 5:00 pm

Re: Sound Change Quickie Thread

Post by Zaarin »

LinguistCat wrote:Are there sound changes besides dropping the last consonant or vowel of a word that could happen to the last syllable of a word?

I was thinking since /k/ in the proto-language already voices to [g] in intervocalic positions, and there's free variation between the stop form and fricatives [x~ɣ] (voicing still dependent on environment), it would be fair to say that [ɣ] became the predominant pronunciation intervocalically, especially at the ends of words. (ETA: This would be syllable initial but in the final syllable of a word.)

Similar sound changes might be applied to the other stops but I wanted to see if it was feasible for this change specifically first. Thanks!
Final consonants can debuccalize, as in English and some other languages. Final vowels can lengthen/break (presumably under stress) or shorten/reduce (as in English).
"But if of ships I now should sing, what ship would come to me,
What ship would bear me ever back across so wide a Sea?”

Knit Tie
Lebom
Lebom
Posts: 101
Joined: Thu Oct 13, 2016 2:43 am
Location: Russia, Saint-Petersburg

Re: Sound Change Quickie Thread

Post by Knit Tie »

Speaking of stress, I'd like to do some stress-based lentition/fortition of consonants too. How does /w/ → /gʷ/ → /g/ → /ɣ/ and /j/ → /ʒ/ in the onset of stressed syllables and /m/ → /w̃/ → ∅ in codas of unstressed syllables sound? If I go full-bore with the stress-consonant interaction and divide the entire phonology into two sets of phonemes, one of which can only be founf in unstressed syllables and one in stressed ones, would that be too much?

Travis B.
Sumerul
Sumerul
Posts: 3570
Joined: Mon Jun 20, 2005 12:47 pm
Location: Milwaukee, US

Re: Sound Change Quickie Thread

Post by Travis B. »

Knit Tie wrote:Speaking of stress, I'd like to do some stress-based lentition/fortition of consonants too. How does /w/ → /gʷ/ → /g/ → /ɣ/ and /j/ → /ʒ/ in the onset of stressed syllables and /m/ → /w̃/ → ∅ in codas of unstressed syllables sound? If I go full-bore with the stress-consonant interaction and divide the entire phonology into two sets of phonemes, one of which can only be founf in unstressed syllables and one in stressed ones, would that be too much?
g > ɣ is the sort of change I would expect in the onsets of unstressed syllables (especially when intervocalic) or in codas, not in the onsets of stressed syllables (or at least not at the start of an utterance).
Dibotahamdn duthma jallni agaynni ra hgitn lakrhmi.
Amuhawr jalla vowa vta hlakrhi hdm duthmi xaja.
Irdro. Irdro. Irdro. Irdro. Irdro. Irdro. Irdro.

User avatar
mèþru
Smeric
Smeric
Posts: 1984
Joined: Thu Oct 29, 2015 6:44 am
Location: suburbs of Mrin
Contact:

Re: Sound Change Quickie Thread

Post by mèþru »

You could have g > ɣ in all syllables instead.
Knit Tie wrote:divide the entire phonology into two sets of phonemes, one of which can only be founf in unstressed syllables and one in stressed ones, would that be too much?
Then they might be considered allophonic sets rather than two phonemic sets.
ìtsanso, God In The Mountain, may our names inspire the deepest feelings of fear in urkos and all his ilk, for we have saved another man from his lies! I welcome back to the feast hall kal, who will never gamble again! May the eleven gods bless him!
kårroť

User avatar
LinguistCat
Avisaru
Avisaru
Posts: 250
Joined: Thu Apr 13, 2006 7:24 pm
Location: Off on the side

Re: Sound Change Quickie Thread

Post by LinguistCat »

In a small consonant inventory

/m n p t k s j r w/

would it be reasonable for nasal+stop clusters to become nasal+/j/ or at least more generally nasal+approximant?
The stars are an ocean. Your breasts, are also an ocean.

Travis B.
Sumerul
Sumerul
Posts: 3570
Joined: Mon Jun 20, 2005 12:47 pm
Location: Milwaukee, US

Re: Sound Change Quickie Thread

Post by Travis B. »

LinguistCat wrote:In a small consonant inventory

/m n p t k s j r w/

would it be reasonable for nasal+stop clusters to become nasal+/j/ or at least more generally nasal+approximant?
The general patterns I have seen is that nasal+stop clusters voice the stop and preserve stop-ness and rather voiced stops (which you could have allophonically) tend to lenite when by themselves.
Dibotahamdn duthma jallni agaynni ra hgitn lakrhmi.
Amuhawr jalla vowa vta hlakrhi hdm duthmi xaja.
Irdro. Irdro. Irdro. Irdro. Irdro. Irdro. Irdro.

User avatar
LinguistCat
Avisaru
Avisaru
Posts: 250
Joined: Thu Apr 13, 2006 7:24 pm
Location: Off on the side

Re: Sound Change Quickie Thread

Post by LinguistCat »

Travis B. wrote:
LinguistCat wrote:In a small consonant inventory

/m n p t k s j r w/

would it be reasonable for nasal+stop clusters to become nasal+/j/ or at least more generally nasal+approximant?
The general patterns I have seen is that nasal+stop clusters voice the stop and preserve stop-ness and rather voiced stops (which you could have allophonically) tend to lenite when by themselves.
Yes, but I'm trying to go in a different direction than Japanese (which basically what you said at an early point) and looking for ways to include more nasals in general. So I was wondering if this looked reasonable, even if not the most likely. If not I'll just make them long nasals.
The stars are an ocean. Your breasts, are also an ocean.

Post Reply