Right, if that's what it is. Any language could have a noun referring to something relevant to you which doesn't overlap "possession". Many languages don't have a specifically non-possessive "my", and you couldn't add it without changing the morphology of the language, as opposed to merely adding to the lexicon. That's what I was trying to get at. Anyway.Wurdbendur wrote:There's no reason not to suggest ideas that aren't convenient words in English.
Tirase:
lúdil vi. "to wave, to undulate, to move back and forth" (etym: Kulae lútoel "weave")
next word: blind