Ah, oops, the result should have been /t͡s d͡z t͡x ɣ t͡ʃ ʒ/. But the larger part of my question would be if, going from that, it would be plausible for /t͡ʃ/ to assibilate to /ʃ/ while /t͡s/ and /t͡x/ remain as affricates.finlay wrote:yeah, swap the palatalisation and velarisation and this would make sense. It looks to me like you've just got them back to front. /tx/ is plausible but i dunno if it's an "affricate".Qwynegold wrote:Nope.Jetboy wrote:The change would go: /t͡s d͡z t͡sˠ d͡zˠ t͡sʲ d͡zʲ/ > /t͡s d͡z t͡ʃ ʒ t͡x ɣ/, if that last one is even an actual affricate.
I think /tsʲ dzʲ/ would rather result in either /tɕ ʑ/ or /tʃ ʒ/. But since you already have /tʃ ʒ/ from another source, I think /tɕ ʑ/ would quickly merge with them.
Sound Change Quickie Thread
Re: Sound Change Quickie Thread
"A positive attitude may not solve all your problems, but it will annoy enough people to make it worth the effort."
–Herm Albright
Even better than a proto-conlang, it's the *kondn̥ǵʰwéh₂s
–Herm Albright
Even better than a proto-conlang, it's the *kondn̥ǵʰwéh₂s
Re: Sound Change Quickie Thread
Heterorganic affricates such as /tx/ aren't just plausible, they're attested in multiple Native American languages.
Re: Sound Change Quickie Thread
i just meant i dunno whether they're called "affricates"
-
CaesarVincens
- Lebom

- Posts: 204
- Joined: Thu Feb 25, 2010 7:26 pm
Re: Sound Change Quickie Thread
I'm trying to think of some interesting changes for palatalized consonants.
The beginning phonemes are
/p t k b d g/
/pp tt kk bb dd gg/
/pj tj kj bj dj gj/
/m n mj nj/
/s x sj xj/
/l r j w/
/ɪ eː e aː a oː o ʊ/
I've already decided to take /tj dj sj/ > /ʧ ʤ ʃ/. /nj/ might become /ɲ/ by analogy.
I'm thinking of having the voiceless long stops become aspirated and the voiced prenasalized, but I'm not sure what to do with palatalized labial and velar stops.
The beginning phonemes are
/p t k b d g/
/pp tt kk bb dd gg/
/pj tj kj bj dj gj/
/m n mj nj/
/s x sj xj/
/l r j w/
/ɪ eː e aː a oː o ʊ/
I've already decided to take /tj dj sj/ > /ʧ ʤ ʃ/. /nj/ might become /ɲ/ by analogy.
I'm thinking of having the voiceless long stops become aspirated and the voiced prenasalized, but I'm not sure what to do with palatalized labial and velar stops.
- Nortaneous
- Sumerul

- Posts: 4544
- Joined: Mon Apr 13, 2009 1:52 am
- Location: the Imperial Corridor
Re: Sound Change Quickie Thread
You could do what Tsakonian did and shift them all to palatals.CaesarVincens wrote:I'm trying to think of some interesting changes for palatalized consonants.
Siöö jandeng raiglin zåbei tandiüłåd;
nää džunnfin kukuch vklaivei sivei tåd.
Chei. Chei. Chei. Chei. Chei. Chei. Chei.
nää džunnfin kukuch vklaivei sivei tåd.
Chei. Chei. Chei. Chei. Chei. Chei. Chei.
-
CaesarVincens
- Lebom

- Posts: 204
- Joined: Thu Feb 25, 2010 7:26 pm
Re: Sound Change Quickie Thread
So all of /pj bj tj dj kj gj/ would be come /ʧ ʤ/ or /c ɟ/?
Re: Sound Change Quickie Thread
Palatalized labials usually just reject the palatalization and become plain labials; when they don't, I think the most frequent outcome is for them to become dental. As for the velars, they would probably become palatal, though where they go from there varies; they could maybe end up as alveolar affricates or fricatives?
"A positive attitude may not solve all your problems, but it will annoy enough people to make it worth the effort."
–Herm Albright
Even better than a proto-conlang, it's the *kondn̥ǵʰwéh₂s
–Herm Albright
Even better than a proto-conlang, it's the *kondn̥ǵʰwéh₂s
Re: Sound Change Quickie Thread
How about a change of /zʷu zʷy zʷi ʋu ʋy ʋi/ > /zʷ̩ zʷ̩ z̩ ʋ̩ ʋ̩ ʋ̩/?
Ascima mresa óscsma sáca psta numar cemea.
Cemea tae neasc ctá ms co ísbas Ascima.
Carho. Carho. Carho. Carho. Carho. Carho. Carho.
- Nortaneous
- Sumerul

- Posts: 4544
- Joined: Mon Apr 13, 2009 1:52 am
- Location: the Imperial Corridor
Re: Sound Change Quickie Thread
^ I don't see why not.
There's a lang somewhere that shifted them to linguolabials.Jetboy wrote:Palatalized labials usually just reject the palatalization and become plain labials; when they don't, I think the most frequent outcome is for them to become dental.
Siöö jandeng raiglin zåbei tandiüłåd;
nää džunnfin kukuch vklaivei sivei tåd.
Chei. Chei. Chei. Chei. Chei. Chei. Chei.
nää džunnfin kukuch vklaivei sivei tåd.
Chei. Chei. Chei. Chei. Chei. Chei. Chei.
-
sirdanilot
- Avisaru

- Posts: 734
- Joined: Sat Aug 18, 2007 1:47 pm
- Location: Leiden, the Netherlands
Re: Sound Change Quickie Thread
I thought linguolabials had something to do with certain tribes that had the habit of removing front teeth...? They are, in any case, not common. Though it would be cool to have them in your lang and get away with it !
- ná'oolkiłí
- Lebom

- Posts: 188
- Joined: Mon Aug 24, 2009 5:23 pm
Re: Sound Change Quickie Thread
Similarly, I've read somewhere (I think in a description of Tlingit) that labialless inventories might be able to be traced back to the custom of wearing ornate lip jewelery.
Re: Sound Change Quickie Thread
I take issue with that. Aren't there tribes in Papua New Guinea that also have ridiculous lip discs and stuff but still have /p b m/?ná'oolkiłí wrote:Similarly, I've read somewhere (I think in a description of Tlingit) that labialless inventories might be able to be traced back to the custom of wearing ornate lip jewelery.
- roninbodhisattva
- Avisaru

- Posts: 568
- Joined: Sun Mar 05, 2006 11:50 pm
- Location: California
Re: Sound Change Quickie Thread
Yes. This kind of stuff has nothing to do with how a groups language evolves.dhokarena56 wrote:I take issue with that. Aren't there tribes in Papua New Guinea that also have ridiculous lip discs and stuff but still have /p b m/?ná'oolkiłí wrote:Similarly, I've read somewhere (I think in a description of Tlingit) that labialless inventories might be able to be traced back to the custom of wearing ornate lip jewelery.
Re: Sound Change Quickie Thread
What is a good way to incorporate [ɨ] into a language from a proto-language with the following vowel system?
I was thinking something like [əi]>[ɨ]
Code: Select all
i u
i˞ u˞
e̞ ə o̞
a
a˞
Re: Sound Change Quickie Thread
If the low vowel is more back, it could trigger a chain shift, pushing historic /u/ to /ʉ/, and /o/ to /u/; /ʉ/ could then unround to /ɨ/. However, this isn't exceedingly plausible, because there just aren't that many vowels; possibly there was originally a front low vowel, and the back low vowel would raise to /o/ and the front be pulled back to /a/? Maybe?Zaris wrote:What is a good way to incorporate [ɨ] into a language from a proto-language with the following vowel system?Code: Select all
i u i˞ u˞ e̞ ə o̞ a a˞
"A positive attitude may not solve all your problems, but it will annoy enough people to make it worth the effort."
–Herm Albright
Even better than a proto-conlang, it's the *kondn̥ǵʰwéh₂s
–Herm Albright
Even better than a proto-conlang, it's the *kondn̥ǵʰwéh₂s
-
Bob Johnson
- Avisaru

- Posts: 704
- Joined: Fri Dec 03, 2010 9:41 am
- Location: NY, USA
Re: Sound Change Quickie Thread
/ə/ > [ɨ] in certain contexts would make sense, yes; stressed syllables, high tone, or separated from an /i/ by some single consonants (i.e., umlaut).Zaris wrote:What is a good way to incorporate [ɨ] into a language from a proto-language with the following vowel system? [...] I was thinking something like [əi]>[ɨ]
- ná'oolkiłí
- Lebom

- Posts: 188
- Joined: Mon Aug 24, 2009 5:23 pm
Re: Sound Change Quickie Thread
Didn't say that it was good or plausible explanation...dhokarena56 wrote:I take issue with that. Aren't there tribes in Papua New Guinea that also have ridiculous lip discs and stuff but still have /p b m/?
- roninbodhisattva
- Avisaru

- Posts: 568
- Joined: Sun Mar 05, 2006 11:50 pm
- Location: California
Re: Sound Change Quickie Thread
Then...why...?ná'oolkiłí wrote:Didn't say that it was good or plausible explanation...dhokarena56 wrote:I take issue with that. Aren't there tribes in Papua New Guinea that also have ridiculous lip discs and stuff but still have /p b m/?
Re: Sound Change Quickie Thread
How about /pˤ/ > /qʷ/?
- roninbodhisattva
- Avisaru

- Posts: 568
- Joined: Sun Mar 05, 2006 11:50 pm
- Location: California
Re: Sound Change Quickie Thread
What are the intermediate steps?
- Nortaneous
- Sumerul

- Posts: 4544
- Joined: Mon Apr 13, 2009 1:52 am
- Location: the Imperial Corridor
Re: Sound Change Quickie Thread
Interdentals, then?sirdanilot wrote:I thought linguolabials had something to do with certain tribes that had the habit of removing front teeth...? They are, in any case, not common. Though it would be cool to have them in your lang and get away with it !
Siöö jandeng raiglin zåbei tandiüłåd;
nää džunnfin kukuch vklaivei sivei tåd.
Chei. Chei. Chei. Chei. Chei. Chei. Chei.
nää džunnfin kukuch vklaivei sivei tåd.
Chei. Chei. Chei. Chei. Chei. Chei. Chei.
Re: Sound Change Quickie Thread
i˞ > ɨ˞ > ɨZaris wrote:What is a good way to incorporate [ɨ] into a language from a proto-language with the following vowel system?I was thinking something like [əi]>[ɨ]Code: Select all
i u i˞ u˞ e̞ ə o̞ a a˞
Re: Sound Change Quickie Thread
None, really. The plosive MOA and the pharyngealization influence each other to give /q/ and the labial POA gives the labializationroninbodhisattva wrote:What are the intermediate steps?
- roninbodhisattva
- Avisaru

- Posts: 568
- Joined: Sun Mar 05, 2006 11:50 pm
- Location: California
Re: Sound Change Quickie Thread
Any reason why...
i > e / s_
...couldn't be a really odd conditioned sound change?
i > e / s_
...couldn't be a really odd conditioned sound change?
-
Bob Johnson
- Avisaru

- Posts: 704
- Joined: Fri Dec 03, 2010 9:41 am
- Location: NY, USA
Re: Sound Change Quickie Thread
Avoidance of /si/ → /ʃi/ for some reason? As in, they'd rather preserve the /s/ than the /i/. I'm more familiar with vowels causing consonants to change, though.
What other vowels do you have?
What other vowels do you have?


