Seahorses, I Love 'Em (& other Links of Interest)
- Ketumak
- Lebom

- Posts: 231
- Joined: Sun Feb 09, 2003 3:42 pm
- Location: The Lost Land of Suburbia (a.k.a. Harrogate, UK)
- Contact:
Phew! That's worrying. I didn't imagine anything like that remotely possible and when I first read it, I thought, must be an April Fools' Day story - but no.
This on the other hand was an April Fools' Day story. Flying Penguins from the BBC, now getting a healthy hit rate on YouTube. There's a bit of advertising at the end, which makes you wonder if they weren't aiming at a place on YouTube all along.
Two of our newspapers also carried the story to lend it extra weight -a first in April 1st spoofery as far as I'm aware.
This on the other hand was an April Fools' Day story. Flying Penguins from the BBC, now getting a healthy hit rate on YouTube. There's a bit of advertising at the end, which makes you wonder if they weren't aiming at a place on YouTube all along.
Two of our newspapers also carried the story to lend it extra weight -a first in April 1st spoofery as far as I'm aware.
Your mind will be transported back in time and to the Moon!
"Great men are almost always bad men."
~Lord John Dalberg Acton
~Lord John Dalberg Acton
Actually, back in Thomas Edison's day (you know, the inventor), a local newspaper near his hometown printed an April Fool's joke story that he had successfully built a machine that could convert dirt into food, thus solving world hunger. Because in that day no one questioned the great Thomas Edison, several other papers ran the story themselves (without even checking with Edison!).Ketumak wrote: Two of our newspapers also carried the story to lend it extra weight -a first in April 1st spoofery as far as I'm aware.
The next day, the original paper printed an article revealing the truth, titled "They Bite!".
He had reinvented the plant?Zereskaoate wrote:
Actually, back in Thomas Edison's day (you know, the inventor), a local newspaper near his hometown printed an April Fool's joke story that he had successfully built a machine that could convert dirt into food, thus solving world hunger.
did you send enough shit to guarantee victory?
- schwhatever
- Lebom

- Posts: 157
- Joined: Mon Aug 14, 2006 6:04 pm
- Location: NorCal
- Contact:
ils wrote:The Adventure Time short is MATHEMATICAL RHOMBUS, as several YouTube commenters have noted. I love the part with Abraham Lincoln.
Adventure Time wrote:Lincoln: Your mind has been transported into the past. And on Mars. But that's not important now. All you need to know is that you have to believe in yourself!
Kid: NEVER!
[quote="Jar Jar Binks"]Now, by making just a few small changes, we prettify the orthography for happier socialist tomorrow![/quote][quote="Xonen"]^ WHS. Except for the log thing and the Andean panpipers.[/quote]
What exactly is this MATHEMATICAL RHOMBUS stuff about? I googled it and clicked on some of the links that came up, but oddly enough, that didn't really make it any clearer.ils wrote:The Adventure Time short is MATHEMATICAL RHOMBUS, as several YouTube commenters have noted. I love the part with Abraham Lincoln.
Haha! Wow, her son being gay is that much worse than him sneaking a girl in his room that she can't fathom it?
George Corley
Producer and Moderating Host, Conlangery Podcast
Producer and Moderating Host, Conlangery Podcast
Re: Never could stand that dog
So we're at about DH2 here.ils wrote:Someone who adopts the same "I'm the middle of a Usenet flamewar" tone for all public occasions will tend to come off as a dick.
[url=http://nakedcelt.zoomshare.com/files/index.html]The Naked Celt[/url]
[url=http://gyro.opsa.org.nz/][i]Gyro[/i][/url]
[url=http://gyro.opsa.org.nz/][i]Gyro[/i][/url]
Re: Never could stand that dog
Raph: the "MATHEMATICAL RHOMBUS" thing is intentionally nonsensical; that's the joke.
NakedCelt may already have seen this one, but I find the story of recently-deceased "Naked Nomad" Victor Flanagan pretty fascinating.
You mean you've decided to excerpt one sentence from my post and pretend that's the substance of my disagreement with Dawkins, instead of merely the root of my personal distaste for him as explicitly stated right there? That's uncharacteristically DH0 of you, to be a little DH1 about it.NakedCelt wrote:So we're at about DH2 here.
NakedCelt may already have seen this one, but I find the story of recently-deceased "Naked Nomad" Victor Flanagan pretty fascinating.
Oh THAT'S why I was on hiatus. Right. Hiatus Mode re-engaged.
Re: Never could stand that dog
Actually, I couldn't figure out where "objecting to choice of target" would fall on the DH scale. Not squaring off against content would make it DH2 (objection to tone). Then again a choice-of-target objection could be construed as: sides be blowed, he's on the wrong battlefield. He is meta-wrong. That seems more like DH4 (counterargument without refutation). But then again, choice of target is arguably even more important than one's central point, which would put an attack on it at DH7, off Graham's scale entirely.ils wrote:You mean you've decided to excerpt one sentence from my post and pretend that's the substance of my disagreement with Dawkins, instead of merely the root of my personal distaste for him as explicitly stated right there?NakedCelt wrote:So we're at about DH2 here.
So I gave up on that and just excerpted the bit that was clearly about tone and hence DH2. Sorry.
[url=http://nakedcelt.zoomshare.com/files/index.html]The Naked Celt[/url]
[url=http://gyro.opsa.org.nz/][i]Gyro[/i][/url]
[url=http://gyro.opsa.org.nz/][i]Gyro[/i][/url]
So I guess what this means is that the gentleman in question has invented yet another thing to have pointless, divisive meta-arguments about! Shitty.
(However, if you object to my choice of target, kindly note that the post in question was a response to Gabor's inquiry about an aside in another post that was agreeing with and approving Dawkins' attack on a Creationist.)
(However, if you object to my choice of target, kindly note that the post in question was a response to Gabor's inquiry about an aside in another post that was agreeing with and approving Dawkins' attack on a Creationist.)
Oh THAT'S why I was on hiatus. Right. Hiatus Mode re-engaged.
- Ketumak
- Lebom

- Posts: 231
- Joined: Sun Feb 09, 2003 3:42 pm
- Location: The Lost Land of Suburbia (a.k.a. Harrogate, UK)
- Contact:
Zereskaoate wrote:Ketumak wrote:
Two of our newspapers also carried the story to lend it extra weight -a first in April 1st spoofery as far as I'm aware.
Actually, back in Thomas Edison's day (you know, the inventor), a local newspaper near his hometown printed an April Fool's joke story that he had successfully built a machine that could convert dirt into food, thus solving world hunger. Because in that day no one questioned the great Thomas Edison, several other papers ran the story themselves (without even checking with Edison!).
The next day, the original paper printed an article revealing the truth, titled "They Bite!".
Where the people perhaps ought not dwell
Some scientists at Purdue University has drawn a map of carbon emissions per capita in the United States up.
The map is a simple alternation of an earlier map that only charted emissions for one hundred kilometer square cells that looked more or less like merely a population density map. The map reveals some interesting patterns, viz. that the cities of the California coast have rather modest carbon outputs per capita while in the thinly populated western counties of Texas lthe people emit remarkably large amounts of carbon per capita.
The map is a simple alternation of an earlier map that only charted emissions for one hundred kilometer square cells that looked more or less like merely a population density map. The map reveals some interesting patterns, viz. that the cities of the California coast have rather modest carbon outputs per capita while in the thinly populated western counties of Texas lthe people emit remarkably large amounts of carbon per capita.
"Great men are almost always bad men."
~Lord John Dalberg Acton
~Lord John Dalberg Acton
What's funny is that she thinks 16 years old isn't ready enough to date yet.Ollock wrote:Haha! Wow, her son being gay is that much worse than him sneaking a girl in his room that she can't fathom it?
Though, not all that funny that my irl aunt seemed to think her 18 year old son wasn't old enough to date. (The girlfriend was 19). Entertaining, though, to hear stories from him of the shit he used to do with/to her, and to compare it to the mundane things his mother apparently assumes is his limits.
Still, better not to have anyway. The cunt totally has him pussywhipped. She must've dumped him five times by now then gotten back together with him, and he's being a complete subservient bitch about it the whole time.
This post does not digress at all.
Here's a neat link to ameliorate the situation: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0fp5hbwdW3E
(ps: that's not a Rick Roll)
(pps: OR IS IT???)
"It will not come by waiting for it. It will not be said, 'Here it is,' or 'There it is.' Rather, the Kingdom of the Father is spread out upon the earth, and men do not see it."
– The Gospel of Thomas
– The Gospel of Thomas


