Amusing, but not extraordinary.Zumir wrote:Sigh... although Enochian is pretty famous I thought that I'd bring it up anyway. It kind of depresses me that people could believe that a second-rate conlang by a 15-century loonie is a holy angelic tongue. (or a Satanic tongue, depending on your degree of, um, interestingness) . But they do, so, yeah.
The wikipedia article and an honest-to-god believer website:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Enochian
http://biphome.spray.se/d.scot/Enochian/enocmain.htm
Linguistic Quackery Thread, take 2
Re: Linguistic Quackery Thread, take 2
Languages I speak fluentlyPřemysl wrote:Oh god, we truly are nerdy. My first instinct was "why didn't he just use sunt and have it all in Latin?".Kereb wrote:they are nerdissimus inter nerdes
English, עברית
Languages I am studying
العربية, 日本語
Conlangs
Athonian
- WeepingElf
- Smeric

- Posts: 1630
- Joined: Wed Mar 08, 2006 5:00 pm
- Location: Braunschweig, Germany
- Contact:
Re: Linguistic Quackery Thread, take 2
"Older than Sanskrit". Oh dear. That alone is worth 200 millinylands. But indeed, Enochian is so spurious that the belief that it was the language of angels amounts to another 500 millinylands.Zumir wrote:Sigh... although Enochian is pretty famous I thought that I'd bring it up anyway. It kind of depresses me that people could believe that a second-rate conlang by a 15-century loonie is a holy angelic tongue. (or a Satanic tongue, depending on your degree of, um, interestingness) . But they do, so, yeah.
The wikipedia article and an honest-to-god believer website:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Enochian
http://biphome.spray.se/d.scot/Enochian/enocmain.htm
...brought to you by the Weeping Elf
Tha cvastam émi cvastam santham amal phelsa. -- Friedrich Schiller
ESTAR-3SG:P human-OBJ only human-OBJ true-OBJ REL-LOC play-3SG:A
Tha cvastam émi cvastam santham amal phelsa. -- Friedrich Schiller
ESTAR-3SG:P human-OBJ only human-OBJ true-OBJ REL-LOC play-3SG:A
- Zumir
- Lebom

- Posts: 116
- Joined: Mon Apr 11, 2011 9:22 pm
- Location: On ur internets, spamming ur threads
Re: Linguistic Quackery Thread, take 2
I wonder if there are people who believe in the Lingua Ignota as a sacred language.
Zim ho Xsárnicja žovnyce.
- Zumir
- Lebom

- Posts: 116
- Joined: Mon Apr 11, 2011 9:22 pm
- Location: On ur internets, spamming ur threads
Re: Linguistic Quackery Thread, take 2
How many millinylands do you think the IOUO guy gets?
Zim ho Xsárnicja žovnyce.
-
tezcatlip0ca
- Avisaru

- Posts: 385
- Joined: Fri Mar 12, 2010 6:30 pm
Re: Linguistic Quackery Thread, take 2
I wouldn't say "older than Sanskrit" is 200, let's give it 120 mNy.WeepingElf wrote:"Older than Sanskrit". Oh dear. That alone is worth 200 millinylands. But indeed, Enochian is so spurious that the belief that it was the language of angels amounts to another 500 millinylands.Zumir wrote:Sigh... although Enochian is pretty famous I thought that I'd bring it up anyway. It kind of depresses me that people could believe that a second-rate conlang by a 15-century loonie is a holy angelic tongue. (or a Satanic tongue, depending on your degree of, um, interestingness) . But they do, so, yeah.
The wikipedia article and an honest-to-god believer website:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Enochian
http://biphome.spray.se/d.scot/Enochian/enocmain.htm
Angelic language? Definitely some 480 mNy.
The script? Definitely too noobish to be angelic. 40 mNy.
The language? Quack. 40 mNy.
Plus some other features. 80 mNy.
Grand total: 760 mNy. Not bad for 16th century quacks.
The Conlanger Formerly Known As Aiďos
- Zumir
- Lebom

- Posts: 116
- Joined: Mon Apr 11, 2011 9:22 pm
- Location: On ur internets, spamming ur threads
Re: Linguistic Quackery Thread, take 2
http://pandasthumb.org/archives/2006/04 ... the-l.html
I'm not sure what to make of this. There's a good chance that it's a joke.
I'm not sure what to make of this. There's a good chance that it's a joke.
Zim ho Xsárnicja žovnyce.
- Timmytiptoe
- Sanci

- Posts: 59
- Joined: Tue May 24, 2011 2:09 pm
- Location: The Dutchlands
Re: Linguistic Quackery Thread, take 2
The date of the article is a good hint that it's a joke
.
Re: Linguistic Quackery Thread, take 2
Zumir wrote:http://pandasthumb.org/archives/2006/04 ... the-l.html
I'm not sure what to make of this. There's a good chance that it's a joke.
Just what does the last of those words mean in Hebrew, anyway? "Mystical ingredient"?Matt Young wrote:The conventional wisdom is that Hebrew and the languages of Europe share only three words: amen, hallelu-Yah, and Kokah-Kolah.
Zompist's Markov generator wrote:it was labelled" orange marmalade," but that is unutterably hideous.
Re: Linguistic Quackery Thread, take 2
Came across this post on the Word Reference forums in my google results when I was searching for something unrelated. This isn't actually first person quackery, but is some misinformed person perpetuating someone else's quackery.
Here's the gem:
In other words, in North Caucasian languages, it doesn't matter what order the consonants come in!
Here's the gem:
It's a bit off topic, but I've read, that the words of the same origin in North Caucasian languages may consist of similar phonemes in different order, because the "proto-language", which they have been developed from had so many phonemes, that it did not matter much, if you pronounce them in wrong order. I.E. It would be very unlikely to have all those phonemes in another root.
In other words, in North Caucasian languages, it doesn't matter what order the consonants come in!
http://www.veche.net/
http://www.veche.net/novegradian - Grammar of Novegradian
http://www.veche.net/alashian - Grammar of Alashian
http://www.veche.net/novegradian - Grammar of Novegradian
http://www.veche.net/alashian - Grammar of Alashian
Re: Linguistic Quackery Thread, take 2
What a shame a certain bannee isn't around any longer to comment. It might explain the large numbers of phonemes in his reconstructions.Mecislau wrote:Came across this post on the Word Reference forums in my google results when I was searching for something unrelated. This isn't actually first person quackery, but is some misinformed person perpetuating someone else's quackery.
Here's the gem:
It's a bit off topic, but I've read, that the words of the same origin in North Caucasian languages may consist of similar phonemes in different order, because the "proto-language", which they have been developed from had so many phonemes, that it did not matter much, if you pronounce them in wrong order. I.E. It would be very unlikely to have all those phonemes in another root.
In other words, in North Caucasian languages, it doesn't matter what order the consonants come in!
Zompist's Markov generator wrote:it was labelled" orange marmalade," but that is unutterably hideous.
Re: Linguistic Quackery Thread, take 2
I've had long conversations on Satanic/Luciferian messageboards (I'm a Satanist, albeit it a semi-lapsed one) about Enochian, and approaching it from a linguistic perspective. It's both depressing and amusing to see how many people actually really do believe that it is (at very least) a fully-functional natural language and (at very most) Ye Olde Divine/Diabolicke TongueZumir wrote:Sigh... although Enochian is pretty famous I thought that I'd bring it up anyway. It kind of depresses me that people could believe that a second-rate conlang by a 15-century loonie is a holy angelic tongue. (or a Satanic tongue, depending on your degree of, um, interestingness) . But they do, so, yeah.
The wikipedia article and an honest-to-god believer website:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Enochian
http://biphome.spray.se/d.scot/Enochian/enocmain.htm
[quote="Xephyr"]Kitties: little happy factories.[/quote]
Re: Linguistic Quackery Thread, take 2
"I MAY BE A HOGWARTS STUDENT...." Hairgrid paused angrily. "BUT I AM ALSO A SATANIST!"
Re: Linguistic Quackery Thread, take 2
It doesn't matter if it's a joke or a quackery; we can laugh at it anyway.Zumir wrote:Okay definitely a joke.
Languages I speak fluentlyPřemysl wrote:Oh god, we truly are nerdy. My first instinct was "why didn't he just use sunt and have it all in Latin?".Kereb wrote:they are nerdissimus inter nerdes
English, עברית
Languages I am studying
العربية, 日本語
Conlangs
Athonian
Re: Linguistic Quackery Thread, take 2
What in fucking shit is "Nynorsk Yupik Language"??
(EDIT: Yes I know it's automatically generated. I got sent there by a link while browsing the interwebs for Yup'ik stuff, though, and was amused.)
(EDIT: Yes I know it's automatically generated. I got sent there by a link while browsing the interwebs for Yup'ik stuff, though, and was amused.)
"It will not come by waiting for it. It will not be said, 'Here it is,' or 'There it is.' Rather, the Kingdom of the Father is spread out upon the earth, and men do not see it."
– The Gospel of Thomas
– The Gospel of Thomas
Re: Linguistic Quackery Thread, take 2
Xephyr that's automatically generated, you know.
GAAAAHD.
And you're welcome for me telling you that.
GAAAAHD.
And you're welcome for me telling you that.
<Anaxandridas> How many artists do you know get paid?
<Anaxandridas> Seriously, name five.
<Anaxandridas> Seriously, name five.
Re: Linguistic Quackery Thread, take 2
Oh SHIT this is so embarassing! I have no choice now but to go live in the wilderness so nobody sees my face again.
"It will not come by waiting for it. It will not be said, 'Here it is,' or 'There it is.' Rather, the Kingdom of the Father is spread out upon the earth, and men do not see it."
– The Gospel of Thomas
– The Gospel of Thomas
- Drydic
- Smeric

- Posts: 1652
- Joined: Tue Oct 08, 2002 12:23 pm
- Location: I am a prisoner in my own mind.
- Contact:
Re: Linguistic Quackery Thread, take 2
The idea of you turning into a Ted Kaczynski/Randy Weaver oddly wouldn't suprise me one bit.Xephyr wrote:Oh SHIT this is so embarassing! I have no choice now but to go live in the wilderness so nobody sees my face again.
Re: Linguistic Quackery Thread, take 2
What's also amusing is that if you browse the other languages, it does that for all of them...
"If you knew Nynorsk Azerbaijani ..."
"If you knew Nynorsk Azerbaijani ..."
- rickardspaghetti
- Avisaru

- Posts: 399
- Joined: Mon Feb 23, 2009 9:45 pm
- Location: Sweden
Re: Linguistic Quackery Thread, take 2
"If you knew Nynorsk Lakota..."
そうだ。死んでいる人も勃起することが出来る。
俺はその証だ。
俺はその証だ。
- Šm Mepuyoš ab Duhen
- Sanci

- Posts: 20
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2011 7:37 am
Re: Linguistic Quackery Thread, take 2
Yes.Navajo is also a Niger-Congo language and Nynorsk is Austro-Asiatic.dhokarena56 wrote:"Burushaski as an Indo-European Kentum Language"
languages were purty
languages are putrid
languages are putrid
Re: Linguistic Quackery Thread, take 2
I dunno if that's necessarily crackpottery… ever taken a look at some modern-day Iranian langs? Someone familiar with only European IE would be hard-pressed to notice anything familiar. Any IE lang that split off fairly early, and had developed on its own twice as long as Tocharian, would be expected to be not very obvious about its ancestry even to experts.dhokarena56 wrote:"Burushaski as an Indo-European Kentum Language"
[ˌʔaɪsəˈpʰɻ̊ʷoʊpɪɫ ˈʔæɫkəɦɔɫ]
Re: Linguistic Quackery Thread, take 2
A New Yorker wrote:Isn't it sort of a relief to talk about the English Premier League instead of the sad state of publishing?
Shtåså, Empotle7á, Neire WippwoAbi wrote:At this point it seems pretty apparent that PIE was simply an ancient esperanto gone awry.
-
Civil War Bugle
- Lebom

- Posts: 151
- Joined: Fri Jul 09, 2010 5:04 pm
Re: Linguistic Quackery Thread, take 2
Forgive me if I am missing some irony in your statement, but does that article not say it is deliberately reversing the way pronouns work in Arabic and Chinese for a thought experiment?

