Linguistic Quackery Thread, take 2

Discussions worth keeping around later.
Mr. Z
Avisaru
Avisaru
Posts: 430
Joined: Tue Feb 15, 2011 2:51 pm

Re: Linguistic Quackery Thread, take 2

Post by Mr. Z »

Zumir wrote:Sigh... although Enochian is pretty famous I thought that I'd bring it up anyway. It kind of depresses me that people could believe that a second-rate conlang by a 15-century loonie is a holy angelic tongue. (or a Satanic tongue, depending on your degree of, um, interestingness) . But they do, so, yeah.
The wikipedia article and an honest-to-god believer website:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Enochian
http://biphome.spray.se/d.scot/Enochian/enocmain.htm
Amusing, but not extraordinary.
Přemysl wrote:
Kereb wrote:they are nerdissimus inter nerdes
Oh god, we truly are nerdy. My first instinct was "why didn't he just use sunt and have it all in Latin?".
Languages I speak fluently
English, עברית

Languages I am studying
العربية, 日本語

Conlangs
Athonian

User avatar
WeepingElf
Smeric
Smeric
Posts: 1630
Joined: Wed Mar 08, 2006 5:00 pm
Location: Braunschweig, Germany
Contact:

Re: Linguistic Quackery Thread, take 2

Post by WeepingElf »

Zumir wrote:Sigh... although Enochian is pretty famous I thought that I'd bring it up anyway. It kind of depresses me that people could believe that a second-rate conlang by a 15-century loonie is a holy angelic tongue. (or a Satanic tongue, depending on your degree of, um, interestingness) . But they do, so, yeah.
The wikipedia article and an honest-to-god believer website:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Enochian
http://biphome.spray.se/d.scot/Enochian/enocmain.htm
"Older than Sanskrit". Oh dear. That alone is worth 200 millinylands. But indeed, Enochian is so spurious that the belief that it was the language of angels amounts to another 500 millinylands.
...brought to you by the Weeping Elf
Tha cvastam émi cvastam santham amal phelsa. -- Friedrich Schiller
ESTAR-3SG:P human-OBJ only human-OBJ true-OBJ REL-LOC play-3SG:A

User avatar
Zumir
Lebom
Lebom
Posts: 116
Joined: Mon Apr 11, 2011 9:22 pm
Location: On ur internets, spamming ur threads

Re: Linguistic Quackery Thread, take 2

Post by Zumir »

I wonder if there are people who believe in the Lingua Ignota as a sacred language.
Zim ho Xsárnicja žovnyce.

User avatar
Zumir
Lebom
Lebom
Posts: 116
Joined: Mon Apr 11, 2011 9:22 pm
Location: On ur internets, spamming ur threads

Re: Linguistic Quackery Thread, take 2

Post by Zumir »

How many millinylands do you think the IOUO guy gets?
Zim ho Xsárnicja žovnyce.

tezcatlip0ca
Avisaru
Avisaru
Posts: 385
Joined: Fri Mar 12, 2010 6:30 pm

Re: Linguistic Quackery Thread, take 2

Post by tezcatlip0ca »

WeepingElf wrote:
Zumir wrote:Sigh... although Enochian is pretty famous I thought that I'd bring it up anyway. It kind of depresses me that people could believe that a second-rate conlang by a 15-century loonie is a holy angelic tongue. (or a Satanic tongue, depending on your degree of, um, interestingness) . But they do, so, yeah.
The wikipedia article and an honest-to-god believer website:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Enochian
http://biphome.spray.se/d.scot/Enochian/enocmain.htm
"Older than Sanskrit". Oh dear. That alone is worth 200 millinylands. But indeed, Enochian is so spurious that the belief that it was the language of angels amounts to another 500 millinylands.
I wouldn't say "older than Sanskrit" is 200, let's give it 120 mNy.
Angelic language? Definitely some 480 mNy.
The script? Definitely too noobish to be angelic. 40 mNy.
The language? Quack. 40 mNy.
Plus some other features. 80 mNy.
Grand total: 760 mNy. Not bad for 16th century quacks.
The Conlanger Formerly Known As Aiďos

User avatar
Zumir
Lebom
Lebom
Posts: 116
Joined: Mon Apr 11, 2011 9:22 pm
Location: On ur internets, spamming ur threads

Re: Linguistic Quackery Thread, take 2

Post by Zumir »

http://pandasthumb.org/archives/2006/04 ... the-l.html
I'm not sure what to make of this. There's a good chance that it's a joke.
Zim ho Xsárnicja žovnyce.

User avatar
Timmytiptoe
Sanci
Sanci
Posts: 59
Joined: Tue May 24, 2011 2:09 pm
Location: The Dutchlands

Re: Linguistic Quackery Thread, take 2

Post by Timmytiptoe »

The date of the article is a good hint that it's a joke ;).

User avatar
alice
Avisaru
Avisaru
Posts: 707
Joined: Wed Oct 30, 2002 4:43 pm
Location: Three of them

Re: Linguistic Quackery Thread, take 2

Post by alice »

Zumir wrote:http://pandasthumb.org/archives/2006/04 ... the-l.html
I'm not sure what to make of this. There's a good chance that it's a joke.
Matt Young wrote:The conventional wisdom is that Hebrew and the languages of Europe share only three words: amen, hallelu-Yah, and Kokah-Kolah.
Just what does the last of those words mean in Hebrew, anyway? "Mystical ingredient"?
Zompist's Markov generator wrote:it was labelled" orange marmalade," but that is unutterably hideous.

User avatar
Zumir
Lebom
Lebom
Posts: 116
Joined: Mon Apr 11, 2011 9:22 pm
Location: On ur internets, spamming ur threads

Re: Linguistic Quackery Thread, take 2

Post by Zumir »

Okay definitely a joke.
Zim ho Xsárnicja žovnyce.

User avatar
Mecislau
Avisaru
Avisaru
Posts: 491
Joined: Thu Jul 24, 2003 2:40 pm
Location: Maryland
Contact:

Re: Linguistic Quackery Thread, take 2

Post by Mecislau »

Came across this post on the Word Reference forums in my google results when I was searching for something unrelated. This isn't actually first person quackery, but is some misinformed person perpetuating someone else's quackery.

Here's the gem:
It's a bit off topic, but I've read, that the words of the same origin in North Caucasian languages may consist of similar phonemes in different order, because the "proto-language", which they have been developed from had so many phonemes, that it did not matter much, if you pronounce them in wrong order. I.E. It would be very unlikely to have all those phonemes in another root.

In other words, in North Caucasian languages, it doesn't matter what order the consonants come in!

User avatar
alice
Avisaru
Avisaru
Posts: 707
Joined: Wed Oct 30, 2002 4:43 pm
Location: Three of them

Re: Linguistic Quackery Thread, take 2

Post by alice »

Mecislau wrote:Came across this post on the Word Reference forums in my google results when I was searching for something unrelated. This isn't actually first person quackery, but is some misinformed person perpetuating someone else's quackery.

Here's the gem:
It's a bit off topic, but I've read, that the words of the same origin in North Caucasian languages may consist of similar phonemes in different order, because the "proto-language", which they have been developed from had so many phonemes, that it did not matter much, if you pronounce them in wrong order. I.E. It would be very unlikely to have all those phonemes in another root.

In other words, in North Caucasian languages, it doesn't matter what order the consonants come in!
What a shame a certain bannee isn't around any longer to comment. It might explain the large numbers of phonemes in his reconstructions.
Zompist's Markov generator wrote:it was labelled" orange marmalade," but that is unutterably hideous.

Jashan
Lebom
Lebom
Posts: 136
Joined: Sun Sep 07, 2003 6:26 am
Location: Oklahoma
Contact:

Re: Linguistic Quackery Thread, take 2

Post by Jashan »

Zumir wrote:Sigh... although Enochian is pretty famous I thought that I'd bring it up anyway. It kind of depresses me that people could believe that a second-rate conlang by a 15-century loonie is a holy angelic tongue. (or a Satanic tongue, depending on your degree of, um, interestingness) . But they do, so, yeah.
The wikipedia article and an honest-to-god believer website:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Enochian
http://biphome.spray.se/d.scot/Enochian/enocmain.htm
I've had long conversations on Satanic/Luciferian messageboards (I'm a Satanist, albeit it a semi-lapsed one) about Enochian, and approaching it from a linguistic perspective. It's both depressing and amusing to see how many people actually really do believe that it is (at very least) a fully-functional natural language and (at very most) Ye Olde Divine/Diabolicke Tongue
[quote="Xephyr"]Kitties: little happy factories.[/quote]

User avatar
dhok
Avisaru
Avisaru
Posts: 859
Joined: Wed Oct 24, 2007 7:39 pm
Location: The Eastern Establishment

Re: Linguistic Quackery Thread, take 2

Post by dhok »

"I MAY BE A HOGWARTS STUDENT...." Hairgrid paused angrily. "BUT I AM ALSO A SATANIST!"

Mr. Z
Avisaru
Avisaru
Posts: 430
Joined: Tue Feb 15, 2011 2:51 pm

Re: Linguistic Quackery Thread, take 2

Post by Mr. Z »

Zumir wrote:Okay definitely a joke.
It doesn't matter if it's a joke or a quackery; we can laugh at it anyway. 8)
Přemysl wrote:
Kereb wrote:they are nerdissimus inter nerdes
Oh god, we truly are nerdy. My first instinct was "why didn't he just use sunt and have it all in Latin?".
Languages I speak fluently
English, עברית

Languages I am studying
العربية, 日本語

Conlangs
Athonian

User avatar
Xephyr
Avisaru
Avisaru
Posts: 821
Joined: Sat May 03, 2003 3:04 pm

Re: Linguistic Quackery Thread, take 2

Post by Xephyr »

What in fucking shit is "Nynorsk Yupik Language"??

(EDIT: Yes I know it's automatically generated. I got sent there by a link while browsing the interwebs for Yup'ik stuff, though, and was amused.)
"It will not come by waiting for it. It will not be said, 'Here it is,' or 'There it is.' Rather, the Kingdom of the Father is spread out upon the earth, and men do not see it."
The Gospel of Thomas

User avatar
Kereb
Avisaru
Avisaru
Posts: 463
Joined: Sat Feb 12, 2005 12:59 pm
Location: Flavor Country™
Contact:

Re: Linguistic Quackery Thread, take 2

Post by Kereb »

Xephyr that's automatically generated, you know.
GAAAAHD.
And you're welcome for me telling you that.
<Anaxandridas> How many artists do you know get paid?
<Anaxandridas> Seriously, name five.

User avatar
Xephyr
Avisaru
Avisaru
Posts: 821
Joined: Sat May 03, 2003 3:04 pm

Re: Linguistic Quackery Thread, take 2

Post by Xephyr »

Oh SHIT this is so embarassing! I have no choice now but to go live in the wilderness so nobody sees my face again.
"It will not come by waiting for it. It will not be said, 'Here it is,' or 'There it is.' Rather, the Kingdom of the Father is spread out upon the earth, and men do not see it."
The Gospel of Thomas

User avatar
Drydic
Smeric
Smeric
Posts: 1652
Joined: Tue Oct 08, 2002 12:23 pm
Location: I am a prisoner in my own mind.
Contact:

Re: Linguistic Quackery Thread, take 2

Post by Drydic »

Xephyr wrote:Oh SHIT this is so embarassing! I have no choice now but to go live in the wilderness so nobody sees my face again.
The idea of you turning into a Ted Kaczynski/Randy Weaver oddly wouldn't suprise me one bit.
Image Image
Common Zein Scratchpad & other Stuffs! OMG AN ACTUAL CONPOST WTFBBQ

Formerly known as Drydic.

User avatar
finlay
Sumerul
Sumerul
Posts: 3600
Joined: Mon Dec 22, 2003 12:35 pm
Location: Tokyo

Re: Linguistic Quackery Thread, take 2

Post by finlay »

What's also amusing is that if you browse the other languages, it does that for all of them...

"If you knew Nynorsk Azerbaijani ..."

User avatar
rickardspaghetti
Avisaru
Avisaru
Posts: 399
Joined: Mon Feb 23, 2009 9:45 pm
Location: Sweden

Re: Linguistic Quackery Thread, take 2

Post by rickardspaghetti »

"If you knew Nynorsk Lakota..."
そうだ。死んでいる人も勃起することが出来る。
俺はその証だ。

User avatar
dhok
Avisaru
Avisaru
Posts: 859
Joined: Wed Oct 24, 2007 7:39 pm
Location: The Eastern Establishment

Re: Linguistic Quackery Thread, take 2

Post by dhok »


User avatar
Šm Mepuyoš ab Duhen
Sanci
Sanci
Posts: 20
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2011 7:37 am

Re: Linguistic Quackery Thread, take 2

Post by Šm Mepuyoš ab Duhen »

Yes.Navajo is also a Niger-Congo language and Nynorsk is Austro-Asiatic.
languages were purty
languages are putrid

User avatar
Tropylium
Avisaru
Avisaru
Posts: 512
Joined: Sun Aug 07, 2005 1:13 pm
Location: Halfway to Hyperborea

Re: Linguistic Quackery Thread, take 2

Post by Tropylium »

I dunno if that's necessarily crackpottery… ever taken a look at some modern-day Iranian langs? Someone familiar with only European IE would be hard-pressed to notice anything familiar. Any IE lang that split off fairly early, and had developed on its own twice as long as Tocharian, would be expected to be not very obvious about its ancestry even to experts.
[ˌʔaɪsəˈpʰɻ̊ʷoʊpɪɫ ˈʔæɫkəɦɔɫ]

User avatar
Arzena
Lebom
Lebom
Posts: 240
Joined: Sat Jun 14, 2008 1:19 pm
Location: ¡California, Tejas, Marruecos!

Re: Linguistic Quackery Thread, take 2

Post by Arzena »

Arabic doesn't have words for she and he

!الله استغفر
A New Yorker wrote:Isn't it sort of a relief to talk about the English Premier League instead of the sad state of publishing?
Abi wrote:At this point it seems pretty apparent that PIE was simply an ancient esperanto gone awry.
Shtåså, Empotle7á, Neire Wippwo

Civil War Bugle
Lebom
Lebom
Posts: 151
Joined: Fri Jul 09, 2010 5:04 pm

Re: Linguistic Quackery Thread, take 2

Post by Civil War Bugle »

Arzena wrote:Arabic doesn't have words for she and he

!الله استغفر
Forgive me if I am missing some irony in your statement, but does that article not say it is deliberately reversing the way pronouns work in Arabic and Chinese for a thought experiment?

Post Reply