Chess-Like Game for Four Players

Substantial postings about constructed languages and constructed worlds in general. Good place to mention your own or evaluate someone else's. Put quick questions in C&C Quickies instead.
Post Reply
User avatar
sangi39
Avisaru
Avisaru
Posts: 402
Joined: Sun Mar 01, 2009 3:34 am
Location: North Yorkshire, UK

Chess-Like Game for Four Players

Post by sangi39 »

Carrying on the recent chess-related tradition, I've been working on a four-player chess-like game similar in layout to Fortress, but with non-traditional pieces. Any criticism, advice and other opinions are welcome :)

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Civil War – A Chess-Like Game for Four Players

The board is divided into four regions, each with a three-by-three fortress in the corner. The layout and starting positions of each piece are given below.

Image

The object of the game is to remove the enemy Kings while the player's King sits in the central square, known as the Capital City. If the player fails to place his King in the Capital City before removing all enemy Kings then the game is considered a draw. Only the King can be moved into the Capital City.

No piece can cross the wall of the fortresses (marked out in purple), but any piece can move into or out of a fortress through the gate.

There are a total of ten kinds of piece:

The King can move to any of the surrounding eight squares

Image

The Queen can move one step to any orthogonal square or up to three squares diagonally

Image

The Prince can move one step to any adjacent diagonal square or up to three squares orthogonally

Image

Upon reaching an enemy fortress, the Prince is promoted to a Grand Prince, gaining unlimited movement in the orthogonally forward, left and right directions.

Image

The Bishop can move forward, left or right one square or up to three squares in the two forward diagonal directions.

Image

Upon reaching an enemy fortress, the Bishop is promoted to the Archbishop.

Image

The Knight can move up to three squares directly forward, as well as to the two squares immediately forward in the diagonal direction, and to the two squares directly forward of them. The Knight can skip over both enemy and allied pieces to reach any of these points.

Image

Upon reaching an enemy fortress, the Knight is promoted to the Baron. Only when moving forward can the Baron skip other pieces.

Image

The Pawn can move to any of the square directly in front of it or to one of the two squares diagonally forward

Image

Upon reaching an enemy fortress, the Pawn is promoted to the Pikeman.

Image

Neither the King or Queen are able to be promoted.

Pieces other than the King may capture other pieces through the following process:

a) The attacking piece must be moved orthogonally forward to occupy a square in which an enemy piece currently sits.
b) Each piece has an associated score (King = 10, Grand Prince = 9, Queen = 8, Archbishop = 7, Prince = 6, Baron = 5, Bishop = 4, Pikeman = 3, Knight = 2, Pawn = 1)
c) A piece of higher value may capture any piece of lower value automatically.
d) If a piece of lower value attempts to attack a piece of higher value, then a twelve-sided die must be rolled, returning a number greater than the difference in value between the two pieces plus one for the attack to be successful. For example, if a Pawn (1) tries to take a King (10), then the die must show a number higher than 10. However, if a Pawn (1) tries to take a Knight (2), then the die must show a number greater than 2.
e) If a piece tries to take a piece of equal value then the die must show a number between (and including) 9 and 12.
f) If the result of the die roll is equal to the value of the difference between the two pieces (or between 5 and 8 for equal value pieces), then the attack is considered a draw and the attacking piece is returned to the square it occupied at the start of the turn.
g) If the result of the die roll is less than the value of the difference between the two pieces (or between 1 and 4 for equal value pieces), then the attack is considered a failure and the attacking piece is removed from the board.

Special note should be made regarding the direction of attack. Pieces other than the King and Queen have a forward “face”, facing away from the player. This face marks out which direction is considered orthogonally forward, and thus which way a piece can attack. As a result, a Pawn, Knight, Bishop and Prince can only attack when moving away from the player, regardless of, in the case of the Prince, that piece is moving backwards. However, the promoted pieces, when moving backwards, are considered to be “retreating” and thus conceptually moving forward. As a result, a Grand Prince, Archbishop, Baron and Pikeman can attack pieces while moving backwards. The Queen is, therefore, the only piece that can attack in any orthogonal direction from the start of the game.

When attacking an enemy King in the Capital City, the player needs to place their attacking piece in an orthogonally adjacent square and then roll the die. This differs from other attacks in that the attacking piece does not take over the square previously occupied by an an enemy piece.

When a King is captured, the player can continue moving their pieces. Betrayal is still possible, but it involves promoting a Grand Prince to a King and skipping a turn (a Prince cannot be promoted to a King). If the player who lost their King has no Grand Prince, then they lose control of their pieces to either their ally or the player who captured their King, both of whom are then able to make two moves per turn, one using their pieces and the other using the newly-controlled pieces (in the case of a triple alliance, this gives one player an extremely weighted advantage of three moves per turn against one move per turn). If the player does have a Grand Prince, then they are capable of moving their own pieces, but must promote the Grand Prince to a King in order to betray their ally or “controlling” King.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

There are several different two-player and three-player variants which follow generally the same rules and which can be derived from the above rules (for example, the transfer of pieces upon capturing a King means that in "non-weighted" three-player variants, capturing the "neutral" King results in the player gaining a new set of pieces).
You can tell the same lie a thousand times,
But it never gets any more true,
So close your eyes once more and once more believe
That they all still believe in you.
Just one time.

User avatar
finlay
Sumerul
Sumerul
Posts: 3600
Joined: Mon Dec 22, 2003 12:35 pm
Location: Tokyo

Re: Chess-Like Game for Four Players

Post by finlay »

Uh, why do you have dice-rolls in a chess-like game? Doesn't that defeat the purpose a little bit?

Shm Jay
Avisaru
Avisaru
Posts: 823
Joined: Thu Nov 14, 2002 11:29 pm

Re: Chess-Like Game for Four Players

Post by Shm Jay »

Isn't that like the old Indian game of chaturanga?

User avatar
Miekko
Avisaru
Avisaru
Posts: 364
Joined: Fri Jun 13, 2003 9:43 am
Location: the turing machine doesn't stop here any more
Contact:

Re: Chess-Like Game for Four Players

Post by Miekko »

finlay wrote:Uh, why do you have dice-rolls in a chess-like game? Doesn't that defeat the purpose a little bit?
Historically not unusual at all - in many medieval European variants, dice roll decided which piece you got to move.
< Cev> My people we use cars. I come from a very proud car culture-- every part of the car is used, nothing goes to waste. When my people first saw the car, generations ago, we called it šuŋka wakaŋ-- meaning "automated mobile".

Post Reply