Kämpya

Substantial postings about constructed languages and constructed worlds in general. Good place to mention your own or evaluate someone else's. Put quick questions in C&C Quickies instead.
Post Reply
Linguist Wannabe
Lebom
Lebom
Posts: 91
Joined: Wed Oct 10, 2007 9:26 pm

Kämpya

Post by Linguist Wannabe »

This is a language for my future Antarctican conworld (after the ice has melted). I've decided that the continent is too large for one language.

It is spoken by the descendants of Burmese immigrants, who mixed with a wide variety of other people. The script still very strongly resembles Burmese, though with some modifications (e.g. the set of consonants that corresponded to Pali retroflexes has been lost, as have stacked consonants. Also a few more letters that correspond to foreign sounds have been added). The phonology is also reminiscent of Burmese, with a voicing contrast in nasals and an aspiration contrast in stops. Though there is some influence from other languages (e.g. the rules on monophthong and diphthong distribution in open and closed syllables have been lost, and syllable codas can hae /p/, /t/ and /k/ instead of just the glottal stop /ʔ/). There have also been some innovations (e.g. in the tone system, and the emergence of a labiodental flap / approximant /ⱱ/~/ʋ/).

Anyway, here is the phonology:

Consonants:

Stops /pʰ p b tʰ t d kʰ k g/ (/b/, /d/ and /g/ are often pronounced as slightly implosive.)

Nasals /m̥ m n̥ n ŋ/ (The voiceless velar nasal /ŋ̊/ also occurs in writing, but it is almost always pronounced as a voiced velar nasal [ŋ], the only exception being in religious contexts)

Fricatives /θ ð sʰ s z ɬ h/ (/ɬ/ corresponds to Burmese */l̥/, and */sl/ in English loanwords)

Semivowels /w j/

Other Sonorants /ⱱ~ʋ ɾ l/ ([ⱱ] and [ʋ] are in free variation)


Vowels

Monophthongs /a i u e o/

Diphthongs /ai au ei ou/


Phonotactics

In the standard dialect, only syllables of the form (COnset) (j / w) V (CCoda) are permitted.

COnset can be any other consonant other than /w/ or /j/.

CCoda can be any consonant other than an approximant or a fricative (with the exception that, in stressed syllables, /h/ is allowed in coda position).

Coda /h/ can only ever occur after monophthongs, not diphthongs.

/ʋ/ and /ɾ/ are rare except immediately after a stressed monophthong.

/ŋj/ syllable onsets are forbidden.

In writing and formal speech, syllables can also begin with /pʰl/, /pl/, /bl/, /kʰl/, /kl/ and /gl/. But outside formal speech, the /l/ is usually replaced with /j/.


Consonant Neutralisations

Voicing and aspiration distinctions are neutralised in syllable codas, though they are still present underlyingly e.g. /sjuðâd/ - "city" is pronounced [sjuˈðâːt], but when combined with the genitive clitic /i/ to form /sjuðâdi/ - "of the city", it is pronounced [sjuˈðâːdi].

If a nasal coda occurs before /h/, an approximant, or at the end of a word, it is simply pronounced as nasalisation of the preceding vowel e.g. /atâuŋ/ - "feather" is pronounced [aˈtâːun]. But likewise it is still present underlyingly, as can be seen when combined with the genitive clitic /i/ to form /atâuŋi/ - "of the feather", which is pronounced [aˈtâːuŋi].


Stress and Phonation

One syllable in each word bears stress. Vowel phonation is phonemic on stressed syllables but not elsewhere. The phonations are harsh <â> (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Harsh_voice), breathy <ä> (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Breathy_voice), and glottalised <á>. Harsh and breathy vowels are pronounced long, glottalised vowels are pronounced short, and with glottalisation of the following consonant (or with a glottal stop [ʔ] in the case of word final syllables).

There are many minimal pairs of words that only contrast stress and phonation e.g. /sitâ/ - "wing" vs. /síta/ - "guardian" vs. /sïta/ - "sister", or /alôun/ - "alone" vs. /alöun/ - "all".


Allophones of /h/

Between two vowels, /h/ is voiced to [ɦ] e.g. /mahakáp/ - "eternity" is pronounced /maɦaˈkaʔp/

/h/ can occur in the coda of stressed syllables. It's realisation depends on the phonation of the previous vowel, but is always pharyngeal.

If the stressed vowel has breathy phonation, the /h/ manifests itself as a pharyngeal fricative [ħ] e.g. /äh/ - "question" is pronounced [a̤ːħ]. Compare /ŋä/ - "fish" which is pronounced [ŋäː]

If the stressed vowel has glottalised phonation, the /h/ manifests itself as a pharyngeal stop [ʡ] e.g. /dáh/ - "dark" is pronounced [daʡ]. Compare /tá/ - "wish" (in a nostalgic context) which is pronounced with a glottal stop [taʔ].

/h/ never occurs after vowels with harsh phonation.

Of course, if a process such a cliticisation (e.g. with the genitive clitic /i/) means that the /h/ is no longer in coda position, then these process do not occur e.g.

/äh i/ - "of the question" is pronounced [ˈäɦi].

/dáh i/ - "of the dark one" is pronounced [ˈdaʔhi].


Also, if a coda [ʡ] (i.e. /h/ after a glottalised stressed vowel) is followed by a consonant that can be aspirated (i.e. /p/, /t/, /k/, or /s/), there is a tendency to manifest this as aspiration on the consonant instead e.g.

/bóhsout/ - "bauxite", can be pronounced either [ˈboʡsout] or [ˈbosʰout].


Pitch of Stressed Syllables

The part of speech that a word belongs to affects how the vowel in the stressed syllable is pronounced:

Class 1) Most Nouns and Verbs
  • Harsh <â> - Falling Pitch + Harsh Voice
    Breathy <ä> - Low Pitch + Breathy Voice
    Glottalised <á> - High Pitch + Glottal Stop
Class 2) Restrictive adjectives, Inalienable possessors, Nouns used attributively, Verbs used in compounds
  • Harsh <â> - Low Pitch + Harsh Voice
    Breathy <ä> - Low Pitch + Breathy Voice
    Glottalised <á> - Low Pitch + Glottal Stop
Class 3) Non-restrictive adjectives
  • Harsh <â> - High Pitch + Tense Voice
    Breathy <ä> - Rising Pitch + Faucalised Voice
    Glottalised <á> - High Pitch + Glottal Stop
For example, when the word /pʰjûɾ/ is pronounced with a falling pitch and harsh voice, it means either "food" or "eat". When it has low pitch and harsh voice, it means "edible" (used as a restrictive adjective). And when it has high pitch and tense voice, it means "edible" (used as a non-restrictive adjective).


Pitch of Unstressed Syllables

This also depends on the part of speech that the word belongs to, and also the syllable's position in the word (in relation to the stressed syllable).

1. Most Nouns and Verbs -> High Pitch (if before the stressed syllable), or Low Pitch (if after the stressed syllable).
2. Restrictive adjectives, Inalienable possessors, Nouns used attributively, Verbs used in compounds -> High Pitch
3. Non-restrictive adjectives -> Low Pitch


Examples

Below is a list of some words, and how their pronunciation of each syllable changes depending on what word class it is (stressed syllables are in bold):

/kämpja/ - "Kämpya"
  • Class 1- Breathy Low - Low
    Class 2- Breathy Low - High
    Class 3- Faucalised Rising - Low
/sitâ/ - "wing"
  • Class 1- High - Harsh Falling
    Class 2- High - Harsh Low
    Class 3- Low - Tense High
/síta/ - "guardian"
  • Class 1 - Glottal High - Low
    Class 2- Glottal Low - High
    Class 3- Glottal High - Low
/sïta/ - "sister"
  • Class 1- Breathy Low - Low
    Class 2- Breathy Low - High
    Class 3- Faucalised Rising - Low
/alôun/ - "alone"
  • Class 1- High - Harsh Falling
    Class 2- High - Harsh Low
    Class 3- Low - Tense High
/alôuni/ - "alone" + Genitive / Ergative clitic /i/
  • Class 1- High - Harsh Falling - Low
    Class 2- High - Harsh Low - High
    Class 3- Low - Tense Rising - Low
/alöun/ - "all"
  • Class 1- High - Breathy Low
    Class 2- High - Breathy Low
    Class 3- Low - Faucalised Rising
/alöuni/ - "all" + Genitive / Ergative clitic /i/
  • Class 1- High - Breathy Low - Low
    Class 2- High - Breathy Low - High
    Class 3- Low - Faucalised Rising - Low
If this explanation of the phonology is not clear, then please let me know. Also please let me know what you think regarding the naturalness of this phonology :)
Last edited by Linguist Wannabe on Tue Nov 12, 2013 12:17 am, edited 2 times in total.

Linguist Wannabe
Lebom
Lebom
Posts: 91
Joined: Wed Oct 10, 2007 9:26 pm

Re: Kämpya

Post by Linguist Wannabe »

Kämpya is an isolating language, so I'll move on to talking about the syntax.

Noun Phrases

The basic word order in a noun phrase is:
Demonstrative - Numeral - Restrictive Adjective - Noun - Non Restrictive Adjective

You can read up about restrictiveness here: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Restrictiveness

For example, we can combine the adjective /jêlau/ - "yellow", and the noun /sôu/ - "sun" to say:

/sôu jêlau/

sun yellow

"The yellow sun"

As there is only one sun, the adjective "yellow" is not restricting which sun we are talking about, and thus follows the noun.

Only if we were disambiguating between multiple suns (maybe in the context of astronomy) would it make sense to say /jêlau sôu/, with the adjective before the noun.

Note that restrictiveness also affects the pitch pattern of the adjective. For instance when /jêlau/ - "yellow" is used as a non-restrictively, the first syllable has High Pitch and Tense Voice, while the second has Low Pitch. When it is used restrictively, the first syllable has Low Pitch and Harsh Voice, while the second has High Pitch.

That's all for tonight. I'll post more later. Please let me know what you think :)

User avatar
kanejam
Avisaru
Avisaru
Posts: 257
Joined: Sat Mar 30, 2013 1:16 pm
Location: New Zealand

Re: Kämpya

Post by kanejam »

I really like the way words change pitch based on what word class they are; it's like the phonation is the main distinction and the pitch is just a suprafix, conveniently just being discussed in another thread. Is it something Burmese does already or just something you made up? Very cool anyway.

I'm not too sure about the 'restrictive' vs 'unrestrictive' distinction. It seems like it's basically a specifity marker, which is a neat way of marking specificity.
If you cannot change your mind, are you sure you have one?

Here's a thread on Oscan.

Linguist Wannabe
Lebom
Lebom
Posts: 91
Joined: Wed Oct 10, 2007 9:26 pm

Re: Kämpya

Post by Linguist Wannabe »

kanejam wrote:I really like the way words change pitch based on what word class they are; it's like the phonation is the main distinction and the pitch is just a suprafix, conveniently just being discussed in another thread.


Yes I was aiming for the tone to be a suprafix. And I started that thread because I wanted to canvas people's ideas on that topic.
kanejam wrote:Is it something Burmese does already or just something you made up? Very cool anyway.
As far as I know Burmese doesn't do anything like that (it conflates pitch and phonation). But I've seen plenty of examples of tone being used in derivational morphology (in other Tibeto-Burman languages, Africa and Central America).
I'm not too sure about the 'restrictive' vs 'unrestrictive' distinction. It seems like it's basically a specifity marker, which is a neat way of marking specificity.
Spanish (which influences Kämpya) uses word order to distinguish between restrictive and non-restrictive adjectives. So does Thai in some cases (although its influence on Kämpya is negligible).

Linguist Wannabe
Lebom
Lebom
Posts: 91
Joined: Wed Oct 10, 2007 9:26 pm

Re: Kämpya

Post by Linguist Wannabe »

The next aspect of Kämpya syntax that I'd like to talk about is articles.

There are no definite articles, but there is an indefinite article. It has the allomorphs /ti-/ before a consonant and /it-/ before a vowel e.g.

/sjuðâd/ - "city / cities"

/ti sjuðâd/ - "a city"

/atâuŋ/ - "feather(s)"

/it atâuŋ/ - "a feather"

As we can see from the above examples, normally Kämpya nouns are not inflected for singular or plural, but when they take the indefinite article, they are only ever singular.

It is important to distinguish the indefinite article from the word for one /tì/. The indefinite article is a clitic, which has no stress and is phonologically part of whatever word follows it i.e. it will have plain High Pitch no matter whether it is followed by a noun or (restrictive) adjective. On the other hand, the numeral /tì/ - "one" is phonologically a separate word. In terms of the tonal morphology, it (like all other numerals) belongs to category 2, and is thus pronounced /tiʔ/ with Low Pitch.

Compare the following (the pitch pattern of the syllables is listed after the pronunciation):

/ti sjuðâd/ - "a city" - [tisjuˈðaːt] - High - High - Falling Harsh

/tì sjuðâd/ - "one city" -[tiʔ sjuˈðaːt] - Low - High - Falling Harsh


Also, the numeral for one does not "reverse" (i.e. undergo metathesis) when the next syllable begins with a vowel e.g.

/it atâuŋ/ - "a feather" - [itaˈtaːun] - High - High - Falling Harsh

/tì atâuŋ/ - "one feather" - [tiʔ aˈtaːun] - Low - High - Falling Harsh (not */ìt atâuŋ/)

However, the indefinite article is definitely a clitic and not an affix, since adjectives can intervene between it and the noun e.g.

/ti jêlau atâuŋ/ - "a yellow feather" [tiˈjeːlau aˈtaːun] High - Low Harsh - High - High - Falling Harsh (not */jêlau it atâuŋ/)

Please let me know what you think :)

Linguist Wannabe
Lebom
Lebom
Posts: 91
Joined: Wed Oct 10, 2007 9:26 pm

Re: Kämpya

Post by Linguist Wannabe »

The next area I'll comment on is demonstratives.

Like English, Kämpya makes a two-way distance distinction in demonstratives. /dâ/ corresponds to English "this", and /tʰôu/ to English "that".

When they are used as pronominal demonstratives, their use is straightforward. They belong to Class 1 (for the purpose of assigning tone) and thus both have Falling Pitch with Harsh Phonation. Unlike English, they can be modified directly by adjectives e.g.

/jêlau dâ/
yellow this
"this yellow one" (as opposed to other ones which are not yellow)

Since the adjective /jêlau/ - "yellow" in this case is restrictive, it has Low Pitch with Harsh Phonation on the first (stressed) syllable, and High Pitch on the second.

If we wanted to use the adjective non-restrictively, the phrase would be:

/dâ jêlau/
this yellow
"the thing here, which is yellow"

But because the adjective /jêlau/ - "yellow" is non restrictive, it has High Pitch with Tense Phonation on the first (stressed) syllable, and Low Pitch on the second.

Note that, it both of these cases, /dâ/ is fuctioning as a pronominal demonstrative, and thus belongs to the same tone class as nouns (Class 1). This means that, in both cases, it has Falling Pitch with Harsh Phonation.

Using these words as adnominal demonstratives (i.e. modifying another noun) depends on whether or not the noun they modify describes a location.

Normally, the demonstrative is placed into Tone Class 2 (i.e. it has Low Pitch and Harsh Phonation) e.g.

/dâ ŋä/ - "this fish", pronounced [daː ŋaː] (Harsh Low - Breathy Low).

But when they modify a noun that denotes a place, the demonstratives are "stripped of their phonation". That is to say, they become unstressed syllables that are phonologically part of the following word (and thus cannot be marked for phonation). Since Harsh Phonation also increases the vowel length, this is lost e.g.

/da sjuðâd/ - "this city", pronounced [dasjuˈðaːt] (High - High - Harsh Falling)

When an adnominal demonstrative is used, the indefinite article cannot occur, so */da ti sjuðâd/ is ungrammatical, However numerals can occur. So it is grammatical to say /da tí sjuðâd/ - "this one city", pronounced [daˈtiʔ sjuˈðaːt] (High - Glottal Low - High - Harsh Falling).

Also note that any adjective can be nominalised by changing it to Tone Class 1. For example if /jêlau/ - "yellow" is pronounced with Falling Pitch and Harsh Phonation on the first, stressed syllable, and Low Pitch on the second, then it is a noun meaning "the yellow (thing)". So it is possible to say /da jêlau/ - "this yellow thing", which is pronounced [daˈjeːlau] (High - Harsh Falling - Low). This contrasts with the previously discussed /dâ jêlau/ - "this thing here, which is yellow", which is pronounced [daː ˈjeːlau] (Harsh Falling - Tense High - Low), which has /dâ/ in Tone Class 1 (as a noun), and /jêlau/ in Tone Class 3 (as a non-restrictive adjective).

Linguist Wannabe
Lebom
Lebom
Posts: 91
Joined: Wed Oct 10, 2007 9:26 pm

Re: Kämpya

Post by Linguist Wannabe »

Possessive pronouns also occupy the same syntactic "slot" as demonstratives.

There are two sets of possessives, one for alienable possession, and another for inalienable. The alienable possessives all belong to Tone Class 2. The inalienable possessives are all unstressed syllables that are phonologically part of the same word. Compare the following:

/bwo kʰjedáuk/ (pronounced [bwokʰjeˈdauk] (High - High - Glottal High))
2PS.INALIENABLE

/bwö kʰjedáuk/ (pronounced [bwoː kʰjeˈdauʔk] (Breathy Low - High - Glottal High))
2PS.ALIENABLE leg
Your leg (i.e. not in your body, maybe a leg of chicken)

Here is a list of the possessive pronouns::

1PS Exclusive Singular / Plural i.e. either "my", or "our" (not including you)
Inalienable: /mi-/ (before a word starting with a consonant), /mj-/ (before a word starting with a vowel)
Alienable: /mî/

1PS Inclusive i.e. "our" (including you)
Inalienable: /lan-/
Alienable: /lân/

2PS (Singular or Plural)
Inalienable: /bwo-/ (before a word starting with a consonant), /bwos-/ (before a word starting with a vowel)
Alienable: /bwö/

3PS Proximate (Belonging to the noun that is topicalised in the sentence)
Inalienable: /se-/
Alienable /sê/

3PS Obviative (Belonging to someone other than the noun that is topicalised in the sentence)
Inalienable: /swi-/ (before a word starting with a consonant), /siw-/ (before a word starting with a vowel)
Alienable: /swî/

Unreferenced Possessor (loosely translates into English as "someone else's")
Inalienable: /le/ (before a word starting with a consonant), /el/ (before a word starting with a vowel)
Alienable: /lê/

Post Reply