If natlangs were conlangs...

Discussion of natural languages, or language in general.
User avatar
Particles the Greek
Lebom
Lebom
Posts: 181
Joined: Tue Sep 17, 2013 1:48 am
Location: Between clauses

If natlangs were conlangs...

Post by Particles the Greek »

how would you evaluate them?

To start with, I'd say Sanskrit was designed by someone with way, way too much free time on her hands.
Non fidendus est crocodilus quis posteriorem dentem acerbum conquetur.

User avatar
Chagen
Avisaru
Avisaru
Posts: 707
Joined: Thu Sep 22, 2011 11:54 pm

Re: If natlangs were conlangs...

Post by Chagen »

I'd give that to PIE, actually. 18 ways to form present tense what the fuck
Nūdhrēmnāva naraśva, dṛk śraṣrāsit nūdhrēmanīṣṣ iźdatīyyīm woḥīm madhēyyaṣṣi.
satisfaction-DEF.SG-LOC live.PERFECTIVE-1P.INCL but work-DEF.SG-PRIV satisfaction-DEF.PL.NOM weakeness-DEF.PL-DAT only lead-FUT-3P

User avatar
KathTheDragon
Smeric
Smeric
Posts: 2139
Joined: Thu Apr 25, 2013 4:48 am
Location: Brittania

Re: If natlangs were conlangs...

Post by KathTheDragon »

English's orthography was designed by a troll.

User avatar
Legion
Avisaru
Avisaru
Posts: 522
Joined: Sat Mar 05, 2005 9:56 pm

Re: If natlangs were conlangs...

Post by Legion »

I think this kind of thread has been done before (and also should probably not be in L&L).

User avatar
ol bofosh
Smeric
Smeric
Posts: 1169
Joined: Tue Dec 06, 2011 5:30 pm
Location: tʰæ.ɹʷˠə.ˈgɜʉ̯.nɜ kʰæ.tə.ˈlɜʉ̯.nʲɜ spɛ̝ɪ̯n ˈjʏː.ɹəʔp

Re: If natlangs were conlangs...

Post by ol bofosh »

OTOH, Spanish's orthography was designed by someone with little imagination.
It was about time I changed this.

User avatar
Rhetorica
Avisaru
Avisaru
Posts: 271
Joined: Sun Nov 03, 2013 3:33 pm

Re: If natlangs were conlangs...

Post by Rhetorica »

KathAveara wrote:English's orthography was designed by a troll.
Yeah, but only out of admiration for the masterwork of various Gaelics. (As we've discussed.)

I think French is probably the result of someone trying to fix unwieldy roots with diachronics and failing to plan ahead for homophones.

User avatar
Drydic
Smeric
Smeric
Posts: 1652
Joined: Tue Oct 08, 2002 12:23 pm
Location: I am a prisoner in my own mind.
Contact:

Re: If natlangs were conlangs...

Post by Drydic »

Not to mention getting the diachronics wrong sometimes.
Image Image
Common Zein Scratchpad & other Stuffs! OMG AN ACTUAL CONPOST WTFBBQ

Formerly known as Drydic.

User avatar
Herr Dunkel
Smeric
Smeric
Posts: 1088
Joined: Mon Jun 21, 2010 3:21 pm
Location: In this multiverse or another

Re: If natlangs were conlangs...

Post by Herr Dunkel »

No no no you're getting it all wrong you aren't supposed to work like that Ancient Greek what the unholy fuck are you doing wtf stop with the crack
sano wrote:
To my dearest Darkgamma,
http://www.dazzlejunction.com/greetings/thanks/thank-you-bear.gif
Sincerely,
sano

User avatar
Xephyr
Avisaru
Avisaru
Posts: 821
Joined: Sat May 03, 2003 3:04 pm

Re: If natlangs were conlangs...

Post by Xephyr »

The person who made Yup'ik had one idea, and one idea only: "suffixes"! Everything in that language is done with suffixes. Including stuff it wouldn't really occur to you would be even done morphologically. Especially stuff it wouldn't occur to you to be done morphologically. I give it two and a half stars out of five.
"It will not come by waiting for it. It will not be said, 'Here it is,' or 'There it is.' Rather, the Kingdom of the Father is spread out upon the earth, and men do not see it."
The Gospel of Thomas

User avatar
Nortaneous
Sumerul
Sumerul
Posts: 4544
Joined: Mon Apr 13, 2009 1:52 am
Location: the Imperial Corridor

Re: If natlangs were conlangs...

Post by Nortaneous »

someday i'm gonna make a noob-looking alt and its nooblang will be ixil
Siöö jandeng raiglin zåbei tandiüłåd;
nää džunnfin kukuch vklaivei sivei tåd.
Chei. Chei. Chei. Chei. Chei. Chei. Chei.

User avatar
Sleinad Flar
Lebom
Lebom
Posts: 124
Joined: Tue Feb 27, 2007 11:18 pm
Location: Coriovallum, Germania Inferior

Re: If natlangs were conlangs...

Post by Sleinad Flar »

Chagen wrote:I'd give that to PIE, actually. 18 ways to form present tense what the fuck
1. I'd hardly call PIE a natlang. More a "reconlang".
2. 18 ways to construct a present? I'm counting about 6: null, reduplication, n-infix and a handful of thematic suffixes (*-e/o-, *-ye/o-, *-sk'e/o- etc.). Other suffixes (stuff like *-e-ye/o- and *-neh2-) can be derived from those. The rest are derivational suffixes (factitive *-eh2-, stative *-eh1-, desiderative *-h1se/o-).

(I'm not sure I'd call Sanskrit a natlang either, at least not Pāṇini's version of it. In a way, it is (re)constructed by someone with too much time on his hands.)
"Was ist ist, was nicht ist ist möglich"
http://sleinadflar.deviantart.com

Thry
Smeric
Smeric
Posts: 2085
Joined: Tue Oct 04, 2011 12:15 pm
Location: Spain

Re: If natlangs were conlangs...

Post by Thry »

It is common knowledge that Finnish is a kitchen-sinky conlang.

----
Smeric
Smeric
Posts: 1418
Joined: Tue Feb 15, 2011 11:15 pm

Re: If natlangs were conlangs...

Post by ---- »

Thry wrote:It is common knowledge that Finnish is a kitchen-sinky conlang.
Nothing can beat Navajo in the kitchen-sinkyness department. I'm not sure if the other Athabaskan languages are like it, but nothing else even comes close.

User avatar
Aurora Rossa
Smeric
Smeric
Posts: 1138
Joined: Mon Aug 11, 2003 11:46 am
Location: The vendée of America
Contact:

Re: If natlangs were conlangs...

Post by Aurora Rossa »

Thry wrote:It is common knowledge that Finnish is a kitchen-sinky conlang.
How so? It doesn't have any of the hallmarks like excessively bloated phoneme inventory or fussy pronominal distinctions.
Image
"There was a particular car I soon came to think of as distinctly St. Louis-ish: a gigantic white S.U.V. with a W. bumper sticker on it for George W. Bush."

Thry
Smeric
Smeric
Posts: 2085
Joined: Tue Oct 04, 2011 12:15 pm
Location: Spain

Re: If natlangs were conlangs...

Post by Thry »

Is it in any of those hallmarks of yours a humongous lists of affixed cases or you skipped over that?
Nothing can beat Navajo in the kitchen-sinkyness department. I'm not sure if the other Athabaskan languages are like it, but nothing else even comes close.
Hah, I didn't know, what does it have?

User avatar
Salmoneus
Sanno
Sanno
Posts: 3197
Joined: Thu Jan 15, 2004 5:00 pm
Location: One of the dark places of the world

Re: If natlangs were conlangs...

Post by Salmoneus »

Normally, I have little time for these special-snowflake such-and-such-a-language is like a newblang it's so whacked and unrealistic man conversations, which I tend to feel show more about the level of ignorance of what ordinary languages are like than about the specialness of whatever language is in question.

However: Iaai. If somebody posted about Iaai on the board, I probably would think it was a conlang, and not a very good one. It has interdental fricatives - indeed, while it has fricatives at five six POAs (one of which, alveolar, is used only for that fricative), voice is only distinguished on the interdental fricatives. It has front rounded vowels, and one mid back unrounded vowel. It has a labialised bilabial series. It has twelve nasals, six of which are voiceless, and seven approximants, including a glottal approximant...
...And it has at least four dozen common words for 'my', with the true number believed by some to be limitless...
Plus, you know, it's called "Iaai", which is clearly a made-up name...
Blog: [url]http://vacuouswastrel.wordpress.com/[/url]

But the river tripped on her by and by, lapping
as though her heart was brook: Why, why, why! Weh, O weh
I'se so silly to be flowing but I no canna stay!

User avatar
Chagen
Avisaru
Avisaru
Posts: 707
Joined: Thu Sep 22, 2011 11:54 pm

Re: If natlangs were conlangs...

Post by Chagen »

>The very existence of interdental fricatives makes a conlang bad

Really, Sal?

The sheer amount of psychotic and pathological hatred /T D/ get on conlang forums is absolutely ridiculous.
Nūdhrēmnāva naraśva, dṛk śraṣrāsit nūdhrēmanīṣṣ iźdatīyyīm woḥīm madhēyyaṣṣi.
satisfaction-DEF.SG-LOC live.PERFECTIVE-1P.INCL but work-DEF.SG-PRIV satisfaction-DEF.PL.NOM weakeness-DEF.PL-DAT only lead-FUT-3P

----
Smeric
Smeric
Posts: 1418
Joined: Tue Feb 15, 2011 11:15 pm

Re: If natlangs were conlangs...

Post by ---- »

Thry wrote:
Nothing can beat Navajo in the kitchen-sinkyness department. I'm not sure if the other Athabaskan languages are like it, but nothing else even comes close.
Hah, I didn't know, what does it have?
-5 laterals but no rhotic
-sibilant harmony that includes affricates and crosses multiple syllables
-distinguishes tone, length, and nasality on every vowel
-final [h]
-ablaut
-One phonological distinction only appears on verbs
-three-consonant clusters *also* only appear on verbs
-sometimes nouns voice all their consonants when they're possessed
-over 30 different verbs expressing picking up, dropping, or carrying something, depending on what kind of object it is
-7 modes, 12 aspects, and 10 'subaspects', marked by a combination of verbal prefixes and stem changes, which are almost completely indeterminate and have to be memorized for every verb
-direct-inverse marking, but only for transitive verbs where both arguments are 3rd person
-plurality is only marked on nouns that refer to humans, and all of them are suppletive
-distinguishes dual number, but it's only marked on verbs
-the verbs for sit, stand, lie down, and almost every motion verb have different stems for singular, dual, and plural arguments
-countless thematic prefixes that determine a verb's meaning just as much as the stem does. Some of them only appear on one verb, and several of them are identical to each other in most situations.
-Verbal prefixes sometimes switch places

And a whole bunch of other stuff that I may have forgotten. I like it, but it is an absolute nightmare to learn.

Thry
Smeric
Smeric
Posts: 2085
Joined: Tue Oct 04, 2011 12:15 pm
Location: Spain

Re: If natlangs were conlangs...

Post by Thry »

Cool, yea, must be nightmarish.
-sometimes nouns voice all their consonants when they're possessed
lol in Spanish possessed is the same word as haunted (poseído)... my mind involuntarily evoked images xD

User avatar
Tropylium
Avisaru
Avisaru
Posts: 512
Joined: Sun Aug 07, 2005 1:13 pm
Location: Halfway to Hyperborea

Re: If natlangs were conlangs...

Post by Tropylium »

Salmoneus wrote:Plus, you know, it's called "Iaai", which is clearly a made-up name...
Or the result of someone accidentally misreading the name "Laal".
[ˌʔaɪsəˈpʰɻ̊ʷoʊpɪɫ ˈʔæɫkəɦɔɫ]

User avatar
Torco
Smeric
Smeric
Posts: 2372
Joined: Thu Aug 30, 2007 10:45 pm
Location: Santiago de Chile

Re: If natlangs were conlangs...

Post by Torco »

Basque was made by a normal, proficient conlanger with no fucking idea about geography. i mean putting a random language isolate in northern spain? i mean why?! its like I decided to put a quechua influenced lang smack dab in the middle of laos.

User avatar
Abi
Sanci
Sanci
Posts: 58
Joined: Tue Aug 18, 2009 8:04 pm

Re: If natlangs were conlangs...

Post by Abi »

Whoever came up with Australian languages lacking fricatives and all those POA were trying to be unique in a nooby way.

If we can also do conpeople, then whoever made this up was trying to be a smartass.

User avatar
Xephyr
Avisaru
Avisaru
Posts: 821
Joined: Sat May 03, 2003 3:04 pm

Re: If natlangs were conlangs...

Post by Xephyr »

Torco wrote:Basque was made by a normal, proficient conlanger with no fucking idea about geography. i mean putting a random language isolate in northern spain? i mean why?! its like I decided to put a quechua influenced lang smack dab in the middle of laos.
I don't get it. Are you saying that language isolates shouldn't exist?
"It will not come by waiting for it. It will not be said, 'Here it is,' or 'There it is.' Rather, the Kingdom of the Father is spread out upon the earth, and men do not see it."
The Gospel of Thomas

User avatar
Drydic
Smeric
Smeric
Posts: 1652
Joined: Tue Oct 08, 2002 12:23 pm
Location: I am a prisoner in my own mind.
Contact:

Re: If natlangs were conlangs...

Post by Drydic »

Of course not! He's just saying they shouldn't be different from their surrounding languages...oh, wait...
Image Image
Common Zein Scratchpad & other Stuffs! OMG AN ACTUAL CONPOST WTFBBQ

Formerly known as Drydic.

User avatar
R.Rusanov
Avisaru
Avisaru
Posts: 393
Joined: Sat Jan 05, 2013 1:59 pm
Location: Novo-je Orĭlovo

Re: If natlangs were conlangs...

Post by R.Rusanov »

I think he rather meant that Western Europe isn't a traditional zone for language isolates, unlike say the Laotian highland or Papua New Guinea. Even some erstwhile prestigeous romance languages have disappeared or nearly disappeared in that region, but somehow this ancient tartessic or vasconic whatever managed to survive to the present?

An interesting point I will make here is that highland, herding populations resist language assimilation very well. As a boon, whenever the lowlands get depopulated the highlanders can move down and take their place! E.g., compare the Vlachs (Romanians) and Slovaks to their lowland cousins the Romano-Thracians and Great Moravians. Both of whom got assimilated and later lost land to the highlanders. Some other populations like this in Europe are the Arnauts (Albanians) and aforementioned Basques.

This is one of the many reasons I think a nomadic society is the best society.
Slava, čĭstŭ, hrabrostĭ!

Post Reply