There does seem to be a contradiction there, yes. How likely is a group of horseriding nomadic... miners? (BTW, the Gezoro apparently developed ironworking; so actually we're not quite bronze-age anymore by Tsinakan's time.)Salmoneus wrote:In particular, I don't think we can have them settling down in the hills and THEN being nomadic invaders.
The thing is, the Gezoro are supposed to arrive in the mountains a thousand years earlier than you had them. Maybe what happens is that a group of them, after they've already been in the mountains a long time, take to herding horses in the upper Aiwa and then go on to invade the lower valley... while still maintaining ties with their mountain brethren? Is that plausible?So the western nomads should be different from the Gezoro, or prior to the Gezoro. I thought that the latest group being related to the Gezoro would explain the enmity better than some hatred for a group of mountain guys on the far periphery of the empire.
Cool. That seems like a good scenario.I'm fine with Ndak groups being the hill barbarians, I think, and with my guys having always lived in the upper valley.
Another idea: it's said that the Ndak simply absorbed some of their conquerors. So not all the invaders need to have descendants hanging around later. Nor do we need to know what languages they all spoke-- it could be lost in the mists of poorly recorded history.
That makes the most sense to me; or maybe the Miwans occupied the whole Aiwa valley; the ones that became civilized early on became the Ngauro, and the others (Meshi, Miu, et al.) were split apart by the arrival of the Ndak.Maybe, then, the Meshi/Miw once lived in Latsomo? The Ndak could have pushed down the river, sending the Miwans out to the east and the west.
There is a gap between Buruja and Lasomo, where there seems to be nothing of interest; maybe the descendants of the Meshi could go there.The Meshi could have held Buruja for a long time while losing their language in favour of Naidda (perhaps with loans, or with Meshi as a court language or something). Or, maybe they were never there. I just thought that was one way to deal with the "and then everyone sat still for two thousand years waiting for something to happen" appearance.
My understanding-- which may be wrong, we don't have any info on Proto-Isles online-- is that the Proto-Isles-speaking people came there from further east, and probably arrived after the Lotokan-speakers were already there. Legion can clarify whether that's what he had in mind or not.Zhen Lin wrote:I said bay - there's nothing there but water. And Proto-Isles people, yes, but meh.
Fair enough, it too is a later language... and Radius' description made me think it was spoken slightly west of that area, anyway.Now, if we ignore Doroh for the time being...
It's a big enough difference, climate-wise: at 45 N winter is very cold and very snowy; at 30 N it's warm, not really winter at all. Also, the peninsula is close to the large Xshali area which seems like a fair analogue to South Asia.While Lotoka has vocabulary that can't be reconciled with a northerly location, we can handwave it away by saying that vocabulary was inherited from proto-Peninsular. (Then again, I don't think proto-Peninsular is that much more southerly...)
I think the most sensible explanation is to put Lotoka in the south part of the peninsula originally, and have its speakers spread to the islands around the bay shortly before Legion's people arrive; then there could also be Lotokan speakers in the north as recent arrivals, of course.








