Historical Atlas of Arcél
Interesting. I imagine the angry spirits are also the spirits of art and artists?
If we believe the kereminth, the iliu apparently say that there were human civilizations in the past. Considering that the iliu are generally trustworthy, if are sources are, then this provides a whole new layer of knowledge to our understanding of pre-current civilization. It also lends credence to the idea that there are no fossil fuels left on Almea.
If we believe the kereminth, the iliu apparently say that there were human civilizations in the past. Considering that the iliu are generally trustworthy, if are sources are, then this provides a whole new layer of knowledge to our understanding of pre-current civilization. It also lends credence to the idea that there are no fossil fuels left on Almea.
- Drydic
- Smeric

- Posts: 1652
- Joined: Tue Oct 08, 2002 12:23 pm
- Location: I am a prisoner in my own mind.
- Contact:
Atom wrote:Interesting. I imagine the angry spirits are also the spirits of art and artists?
If we believe the kereminth, the iliu apparently say that there were human civilizations in the past. Considering that the iliu are generally trustworthy, if are sources are, then this provides a whole new layer of knowledge to our understanding of pre-current civilization. It also lends credence to the idea that there are no fossil fuels left on Almea.
Which rather invalidates that idea - any civilisation near Eretald would have searched for oil outpourings.http://www.almeopedia.com/index.php/Kara_Desert wrote:The desert is nearly uninhabited, since no Almean species is well adapted to desert terrain. This is likely to change in the future, due to the abundance of cüe Kare or oil of Kara, which can be found at the surface in many regions— petroleum.
- dunomapuka
- Avisaru

- Posts: 424
- Joined: Tue Dec 30, 2003 11:42 pm
- Location: Brooklyn, NY
-
Mornche Geddick
- Avisaru

- Posts: 370
- Joined: Wed Mar 30, 2005 4:22 pm
- Location: UK
- Yiuel Raumbesrairc
- Avisaru

- Posts: 668
- Joined: Thu Jan 20, 2005 11:17 pm
- Location: Nyeriborma, Elme, Melomers
Take your time. We all like your work, but I am sure we will prefer it well done, without hastezompist wrote:By the way, apologies for the delays in the Atlas recently. I got sidetracked by some other Almean projects (both related to Arcél however), and this week I'm sick. Hopefully it'll be back on track next week.
"Ez amnar o amnar e cauč."
- Daneydzaus
- Daneydzaus
- the duke of nuke
- Avisaru

- Posts: 467
- Joined: Thu Apr 06, 2006 1:23 pm
- Location: Leicestershire
- Contact:
- the duke of nuke
- Avisaru

- Posts: 467
- Joined: Thu Apr 06, 2006 1:23 pm
- Location: Leicestershire
- Contact:
I foolishly accept your challengezompist wrote:Glosses?? Did Champollion or Ventris have glosses? You have bilingual texts with some vocabulary overlap; you should see how far you can get.
EDIT: I'm making progress. However, there are some errors in the Nyekhen page (e.g. a word missing from the "words are just wind" quote). There are also what are either more errors, or firm evidence of sandhi or fusional behaviour (I'm getting both het and ħet for "trick").
SMUG EDIT:
It means, roughly, "all-world".Almeopedia wrote:In Uytai the world is ʔarkhel, of uncertain meaning.
XinuX wrote:I learned this language, but then I sneezed and now am in prison for high treason. 0/10 would not speak again.
- the duke of nuke
- Avisaru

- Posts: 467
- Joined: Thu Apr 06, 2006 1:23 pm
- Location: Leicestershire
- Contact:
After a little while of research and half a bucket of peach liquor and peach ice tea (I kid you not) I present my attempt so far.
- Fretuy "devil" literally means "mad ancestor". The tsratuy are worse than devils, then....
- Muren rit fwai evidently means "not to use it", but it's not clear how the verbal constructions work.
- I'm not sure of the difference between het and ħet. For want of something better, I've glossed both as "trick".
- It appears that kwor is the noun and fuy the verb.
- The glossing of hinnar as "therefore" is conjecture, based on hintser "then".
- Syer fyaulen kwet must mean something like "need never worry", but again the verbs are proving difficult.
- Since khyuʔar "defeated" is clearly derived from khyuʔ "victory", I've tentatively glossed the postposition ar as "against". This would make kroyar "armed" literally "sword-against". (Note that this translation is called into doubt by the last quite; see below.)
- Feyram "farmer, peasant" is obvious. Hluʔtsrat "abuse" is also clearly derived from tsrat "evil", so hluʔ presumably means something like "show".
- It's not really clear how question formation works.
- I was tempted to gloss pret as "ten", but since the Uytainese are known to use multiples of four (at least for timekeeping) I'll leave it until more texts become available.
- Tulpyey pwit X syal presumably means "will have more X"; probably syal means "have", but it's far from certain.
- Tsrear clearly means "corpse", since it's derived from tsre ("die" or something like it); but then this would have it literally mean "die-against". Moreover, tswun means "we die"; are there two words for "die", or is it a vestige of a once-productive morphology (like Khmer infixing), or just a translation mistake? Something needs correcting.
I've tried glossing the other quotes, but I doubt it will be possible to do so accurately without more texts. On the other hand, I've got a wordlist of about 100 words now, and got some feel for the grammar. (At least it's fairly consistently head-final.)
Nyekhen wrote:Words are devils, which may lead a man pick up a sword; but they can never teach him to use it.
Code: Select all
Nwai fretuy he; pwer nar mur ħwewn har kroy senphaut kwon muren rit fwai.
word devil be them by can cause man sword pick.up but use- Muren rit fwai evidently means "not to use it", but it's not clear how the verbal constructions work.
Nyekhen wrote:I only use one trick. That trick is to be stronger than the enemy.
Code: Select all
Pyey sruyn or het fwai. Na ħet: tsit swaum tyai he.
I only one trick use that trick strong enemy COMP beNyekhen wrote:Cause fear, and you need never worry about that.
Code: Select all
Khyet kwar kwor krem wau fuy hinnar kwar syer fyaulen kwet.
if you fear cause other fear therefore you- The glossing of hinnar as "therefore" is conjecture, based on hintser "then".
- Syer fyaulen kwet must mean something like "need never worry", but again the verbs are proving difficult.
Nyekhen wrote:The measure of a man is how he faces an armed foe. Cruelty is cowardice: any peasant can abuse the defeated.
Code: Select all
Har nye thai kroyar swaum hluʔ ar syit he.
man of measure armed enemy show against be
Kuyfen nrewnsye he.
cruelty cowardice be
ʔar feyram khyuʔar mur hluʔtsrat.
all peasant defeated can abuse- Feyram "farmer, peasant" is obvious. Hluʔtsrat "abuse" is also clearly derived from tsrat "evil", so hluʔ presumably means something like "show".
Nyekhen wrote:To die in a moment or an hour from the blade, or over a decade from old age? Which is more to be feared?
Code: Select all
Pwer har nit huy nurtyun thu kroy fwai tsre orken pret fyat thu petfen fwai tsre.
they man moment or hour during sword use die or NUM year during old.age use die
Tser huy nar fuy lye?
or by fear- I was tempted to gloss pret as "ten", but since the Uytainese are known to use multiples of four (at least for timekeeping) I'll leave it until more texts become available.
... no, wait.Nyekhen wrote:Then we will fight in the shade.
Nyekhen wrote:Then they will have more corpses.
Code: Select all
Hintser pwi tulpyey pwit tsrear syal.
then they corpse- Tsrear clearly means "corpse", since it's derived from tsre ("die" or something like it); but then this would have it literally mean "die-against". Moreover, tswun means "we die"; are there two words for "die", or is it a vestige of a once-productive morphology (like Khmer infixing), or just a translation mistake? Something needs correcting.
I've tried glossing the other quotes, but I doubt it will be possible to do so accurately without more texts. On the other hand, I've got a wordlist of about 100 words now, and got some feel for the grammar. (At least it's fairly consistently head-final.)
XinuX wrote:I learned this language, but then I sneezed and now am in prison for high treason. 0/10 would not speak again.
Very good job. I apologize for a couple of errors; you already noticed het which should have been ħet. Also 'tsit' in the third sentence should be 'pwi'... I grabbed the wrong word in the grammar.
If you compare that with the last sentence you should be able to guess that pwi means 'more'. Comparatives a bit tricky; the formula is X COMP Y VP. E.g. Pyey pwi kwor kwow he "I am fatter than you", more literally "I more than you am fat."
Ar is simply the subordinator; that should be the key to a few bits. The basic formula is S ar NP where the extracted NP can be either subject or object.
You've got mur 'can'; what could muren in the first sentence be? That -en appears at least one more time.
You have pyey 'I', so what could tulpyey be, especially given that the last sentence is a comparative?
One more clue there is tswun, which just means 'die'. The subject is understood, and that's important in a few other cases, especially in this aphoristic style.
Pwer is really a conjunction; it's used with a few constructions, but pwer... orken... is equivalent to "either...or..."
If you compare that with the last sentence you should be able to guess that pwi means 'more'. Comparatives a bit tricky; the formula is X COMP Y VP. E.g. Pyey pwi kwor kwow he "I am fatter than you", more literally "I more than you am fat."
Ar is simply the subordinator; that should be the key to a few bits. The basic formula is S ar NP where the extracted NP can be either subject or object.
You've got mur 'can'; what could muren in the first sentence be? That -en appears at least one more time.
You have pyey 'I', so what could tulpyey be, especially given that the last sentence is a comparative?
One more clue there is tswun, which just means 'die'. The subject is understood, and that's important in a few other cases, especially in this aphoristic style.
Pwer is really a conjunction; it's used with a few constructions, but pwer... orken... is equivalent to "either...or..."
Possibly, the reason for the continued use of fossil fuels passed coal was, I'd imagine, down to the thought of a profit combined with something with an easy to find use, i.e. "oh woops, I accidentally set it on fire, oh, we do that now with coal, bo need to develop new technology to do that with oil and I can see it being quite useful since it's basically liquid coal, meaning no need to split it, just to pour it" combined with the technology at the time making oil mining easier and cheaper than developing nuclear technology which would likely have been beyond the finances, technology and resources of the time.hwhatting wrote:This kills the idea that no fossil fuels are left, but it's possible that those previous civilisations skipped oil and went from coal directly to e.g. nuclear.Drydic Guy wrote: Which rather invalidates that idea - any civilisation near Eretald would have searched for oil outpourings.
You can tell the same lie a thousand times,
But it never gets any more true,
So close your eyes once more and once more believe
That they all still believe in you.
Just one time.
But it never gets any more true,
So close your eyes once more and once more believe
That they all still believe in you.
Just one time.
It's my understanding that oil as a fuel source developed piece-meal. It had many uses in the past, and was used as a fuel for lamps and torches probably since ancient times. By the time any civilization has started mining coal and using it on a large scale as fuel, they probably already know that oil is generally useful for making fire. I imagine both the intuitive leap and the opportunity cost of moving from coal to, say, nuclear power must be astronomical by comparison.
But in our own timeline, hydraulic and wind power have been around for centuries, too. If there simply aren't any easy-to-reach oil deposits, oil might not be practical. Messing with historical levels of oxygen and carbon dioxide could easily limit the amount of oil available.
But in our own timeline, hydraulic and wind power have been around for centuries, too. If there simply aren't any easy-to-reach oil deposits, oil might not be practical. Messing with historical levels of oxygen and carbon dioxide could easily limit the amount of oil available.
-
Mornche Geddick
- Avisaru

- Posts: 370
- Joined: Wed Mar 30, 2005 4:22 pm
- Location: UK
Ah, we've got to 1112! When I saw the page I thought Faegroy must have been advanced for his time, but then the ancient Egyptians tried their hand at urban planning
On a related note, were the Uyse?ic ancestor cults inspired by any terrestrial culture?
On a related note, were the Uyse?ic ancestor cults inspired by any terrestrial culture?
- Yiuel Raumbesrairc
- Avisaru

- Posts: 668
- Joined: Thu Jan 20, 2005 11:17 pm
- Location: Nyeriborma, Elme, Melomers



