How many times have the uesti invented writing?
-
- Avisaru
- Posts: 409
- Joined: Thu Sep 07, 2006 12:25 pm
How many times have the uesti invented writing?
Only twice by my count. Once by the Wede:i, which inspired Old Skourene hieroglyphs (for lack of a better word) and survived as Axunaic writing systems. Once by the Uytainese, and their system spread across Arcel. The Cuzeians were directly taught by the iliu, so they don't count. Do we know of any other instances? Do the other continents have writing?
It seems incredible to me that Almean humans have never invented the alphabet on their own, and yet IIRC, it has happened only a few times on our planet without some foreign inspiration or coercion. (Greek, Korean and Sogdian derivatives)
It seems incredible to me that Almean humans have never invented the alphabet on their own, and yet IIRC, it has happened only a few times on our planet without some foreign inspiration or coercion. (Greek, Korean and Sogdian derivatives)
If you hold a cat by the tail you learn things you cannot learn any other way. - Mark Twain
In reality, our greatest blessings come to us by way of madness, which indeed is a divine gift. - Socrates
In reality, our greatest blessings come to us by way of madness, which indeed is a divine gift. - Socrates
Re: How many times have the uesti invented writing?
The alphabet was apparantly independantly invented exactly once in Earth's history, by speakers of foreign semetic languages in Sinai, and every other alphabetic script is either descended from that Proto-Sinaitic script or created a priori by people familiar with the principles of an alphabetic script.rotting ham wrote:Only twice by my count. Once by the Wede:i, which inspired Old Skourene hieroglyphs (for lack of a better word) and survived as Axunaic writing systems. Once by the Uytainese, and their system spread across Arcel. The Cuzeians were directly taught by the iliu, so they don't count. Do we know of any other instances? Do the other continents have writing?
It seems incredible to me that Almean humans have never invented the alphabet on their own, and yet IIRC, it has happened only a few times on our planet without some foreign inspiration or coercion. (Greek, Korean and Sogdian derivatives)
Writing, although not alphabetic writing, was invented probably three times in Earth's history, by the Chinese, the Mayans, and the Sumerians (and by the Egyptians as well depending on whether or not heiroglyphics were inspired by Sumerian writing, although they probably were).
So, the Almean situation matches Earth's situation pretty well. Three independant inventions of writing across two continants, one of which was alphabetic. The only difference is that the alphabetic invention came from another species on Almea whereas it was ultimately a descendant of non-alphabetic Sumerian and/or Egyptian writing on Earth. Presumably if Iliu were living in the Mediterranean Sea they might've taught some Semetic people alphabetic writing while they were teaching them knowledge of Iainos (Yahweh) and then that's where we'd have to say all of our modern alphabetic writing systems come from!
con quesa- firm believer in the right of Spanish cheese to be female if she so chooses
"There's nothing inherently different between knowing who Venusaur is and knowing who Lady Macbeth is" -Xephyr
"There's nothing inherently different between knowing who Venusaur is and knowing who Lady Macbeth is" -Xephyr
-
- Avisaru
- Posts: 409
- Joined: Thu Sep 07, 2006 12:25 pm
Re: How many times have the uesti invented writing?
Borrowed from Cuezi.brandrinn wrote:Wait, the Verdurian script is an alphabet, isn't it?
I'm pretty sure you mean the abjad stage, which then gave rise to alphabets. Even so, what about Demotic Egyptian and Korean Hangul? I don't know how scholarly this is, but apparently, we're not even sure of the exact origins of Brahmi anymore: http://www.hindu.com/2004/05/26/stories ... 871200.htmcon quesa wrote:The alphabet was apparantly independantly invented exactly once in Earth's history, by speakers of foreign semetic languages in Sinai, and every other alphabetic script is either descended from that Proto-Sinaitic script or created a priori by people familiar with the principles of an alphabetic script.
Lol no, writing has been discovered several times even without including some intriguing possibilities in prehistoric Europe, India, South America, etc: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_writing But that may just be due to Earth's greater land area. Either way, I'm mainly interested in other continents and off-the-beaten-track developments we may not have heard of much. BTW, I've never heard it seriously argued that Egyptian hieroglyphs were inspired by cuneiforms before.con quesa wrote:Writing, although not alphabetic writing, was invented probably three times in Earth's history, by the Chinese, the Mayans, and the Sumerians (and by the Egyptians as well depending on whether or not heiroglyphics were inspired by Sumerian writing, although they probably were).
Proto-Canaanite isn't an alphabet as such. I just remembered, is the Jippirasti alphabet a real alphabet?con quesa wrote:So, the Almean situation matches Earth's situation pretty well. Three independant inventions of writing across two continants, one of which was alphabetic. The only difference is that the alphabetic invention came from another species on Almea whereas it was ultimately a descendant of non-alphabetic Sumerian and/or Egyptian writing on Earth. Presumably if Iliu were living in the Mediterranean Sea they might've taught some Semetic people alphabetic writing while they were teaching them knowledge of Iainos (Yahweh) and then that's where we'd have to say all of our modern alphabetic writing systems come from!
If you hold a cat by the tail you learn things you cannot learn any other way. - Mark Twain
In reality, our greatest blessings come to us by way of madness, which indeed is a divine gift. - Socrates
In reality, our greatest blessings come to us by way of madness, which indeed is a divine gift. - Socrates
Re: How many times have the uesti invented writing?
Really? It's hardly a crazy, minority fringe viewpoint. If you've actually never encountered it before, perhaps you should read more. For example, "The Origin of Egyptian Hieroglyphs", by Henry George Fischer, in The Origins of Writing (ed. Wayne M. Senner, University of Nebraska Press, 1991. Page 61 onwards, to be precise. You can even look it up on Google Books.)rotting ham wrote:BTW, I've never heard it seriously argued that Egyptian hieroglyphs were inspired by cuneiforms before.
IIRC, Zomp has said it's a featural system like Hangul.Proto-Canaanite isn't an alphabet as such. I just remembered, is the Jippirasti alphabet a real alphabet?
Salmoneus wrote:(NB Dewrad is behaving like an adult - a petty, sarcastic and uncharitable adult, admittedly, but none the less note the infinitely higher quality of flame)
-
- Avisaru
- Posts: 409
- Joined: Thu Sep 07, 2006 12:25 pm
Re: How many times have the uesti invented writing?
No, but I really don't remember this position being argued with sufficient scholarly seriousness. Then again, my memory is a product of my environment. Its retentive power is very high over a period of two days or so.Dewrad wrote:Really? It's hardly a crazy, minority fringe viewpoint.
Great, so the uesti did produce a real native alphabet after all. More info, please?Dewrad wrote:IIRC, Zomp has said it's a featural system like Hangul.
If you hold a cat by the tail you learn things you cannot learn any other way. - Mark Twain
In reality, our greatest blessings come to us by way of madness, which indeed is a divine gift. - Socrates
In reality, our greatest blessings come to us by way of madness, which indeed is a divine gift. - Socrates
Re: How many times have the uesti invented writing?
As a rule, never trust a popular (i.e. non-scientific) newspaper from country X claiming that "the oldest specimen of Y was found in X" or that "feature Y (writing, pottery, toothpicks) originated in country X".rotting ham wrote:I'm pretty sure you mean the abjad stage, which then gave rise to alphabets. Even so, what about Demotic Egyptian and Korean Hangul? I don't know how scholarly this is, but apparently, we're not even sure of the exact origins of Brahmi anymore: http://www.hindu.com/2004/05/26/stories ... 871200.htm
Re: How many times have the uesti invented writing?
This is especially true if country X is on this list:hwhatting wrote:As a rule, never trust a popular (i.e. non-scientific) newspaper from country X claiming that "the oldest specimen of Y was found in X" or that "feature Y (writing, pottery, toothpicks) originated in country X".rotting ham wrote:I'm pretty sure you mean the abjad stage, which then gave rise to alphabets. Even so, what about Demotic Egyptian and Korean Hangul? I don't know how scholarly this is, but apparently, we're not even sure of the exact origins of Brahmi anymore: http://www.hindu.com/2004/05/26/stories ... 871200.htm
India
China
Japan
Macedonia
Turkey
Greece
Bulgaria
Iran
Former Yugoslavia
[quote="Nortaneous"]Is South Africa better off now than it was a few decades ago?[/quote]
- the duke of nuke
- Avisaru
- Posts: 467
- Joined: Thu Apr 06, 2006 1:23 pm
- Location: Leicestershire
- Contact:
- the duke of nuke
- Avisaru
- Posts: 467
- Joined: Thu Apr 06, 2006 1:23 pm
- Location: Leicestershire
- Contact:
Those dastardly, militaristic, expansionist Serbs are at it again, eh? All the way to the Black Sea?thedukeofnuke wrote:Ok, yes. "India, China, Japan, and any country in the Eastern Mediterranean / Black Sea region."
[quote="Nortaneous"]Is South Africa better off now than it was a few decades ago?[/quote]
- Yiuel Raumbesrairc
- Avisaru
- Posts: 668
- Joined: Thu Jan 20, 2005 11:17 pm
- Location: Nyeriborma, Elme, Melomers
Korean Hangul was, oddly enough, inspired by Brahmi, by a long convoluted way (not the shapes though, these were local inventions). Its influence goes even into Japan, where the go-juu-on table is arranged the way they sorted sounds in India.
As for Jippirasti's writing system, it seems to come from Skourene sources. And that ultimately comes from Axunai, thus Wedei.
As for Jippirasti's writing system, it seems to come from Skourene sources. And that ultimately comes from Axunai, thus Wedei.
"Ez amnar o amnar e cauč."
- Daneydzaus
- Daneydzaus
- Serali
- Lebom
- Posts: 135
- Joined: Sun Feb 26, 2006 4:44 pm
- Location: The Land of Boingies Wapo Gipo Mi Mi Mi! n_n
- Contact:
WHAT?!Yiuel wrote:Korean Hangul was, oddly enough, inspired by Brahmi, by a long convoluted way (not the shapes though, these were local inventions). Its influence goes even into Japan, where the go-juu-on table is arranged the way they sorted sounds in India.
As for Jippirasti's writing system, it seems to come from Skourene sources. And that ultimately comes from Axunai, thus Wedei.
I have never heard of this and Korean in general is my favorite language/writing system.
Holy shit.
[quote="Zereskaoate"]I am, however a slave to the boingies. [img]http://i181.photobucket.com/albums/x180/Wapo_Gipo_Frogs88/Boingies/th_thsau222jpg-2.gif[/img][/quote]
[img]http://i181.photobucket.com/albums/x180/Wapo_Gipo_Frogs88/th_1-1.gif[/img]
[img]http://i181.photobucket.com/albums/x180/Wapo_Gipo_Frogs88/th_1-1.gif[/img]
-
- Avisaru
- Posts: 409
- Joined: Thu Sep 07, 2006 12:25 pm
I thought the Siddham route was pure gossip. Or are you thinking of the Tibetan script?Yiuel wrote:Korean Hangul was, oddly enough, inspired by Brahmi, by a long convoluted way (not the shapes though, these were local inventions). Its influence goes even into Japan, where the go-juu-on table is arranged the way they sorted sounds in India.
Where are these posts? Please? Anyone?Yiuel wrote:As for Jippirasti's writing system, it seems to come from Skourene sources. And that ultimately comes from Axunai, thus Wedei.
All it does is report the existence of Tamil Brahmi inscriptions a few centuries older than previously known samples. (only hinting at the origin of writing business, which seems justified) Didn't exactly sound crazy loony to me.hwhatting wrote:As a rule, never trust a popular (i.e. non-scientific) newspaper from country X claiming that "the oldest specimen of Y was found in X" or that "feature Y (writing, pottery, toothpicks) originated in country X".
If you hold a cat by the tail you learn things you cannot learn any other way. - Mark Twain
In reality, our greatest blessings come to us by way of madness, which indeed is a divine gift. - Socrates
In reality, our greatest blessings come to us by way of madness, which indeed is a divine gift. - Socrates
He's probably talking about Phags-pa, which was developed by Tibetans and loosely based on the Tibetan script. That theory is not universally accepted, though Joseon Koreans would certainly be aware of Phags-pa and other ultimately Brahmi-inspired scripts.rotting ham wrote:I thought the Siddham route was pure gossip. Or are you thinking of the Tibetan script?Yiuel wrote:Korean Hangul was, oddly enough, inspired by Brahmi, by a long convoluted way (not the shapes though, these were local inventions). Its influence goes even into Japan, where the go-juu-on table is arranged the way they sorted sounds in India.
[quote="Nortaneous"]Is South Africa better off now than it was a few decades ago?[/quote]
- Yiuel Raumbesrairc
- Avisaru
- Posts: 668
- Joined: Thu Jan 20, 2005 11:17 pm
- Location: Nyeriborma, Elme, Melomers
I was actually referring to phonological awareness, more than any influence over the shape of things. The way consonants and vowels are ordered in Extreme East Asia (Japan and Korea) has a striking ressemblance to how phonemes are ordered in Ancient India. The whole Hangul concept may be a local innovation, but its phonological basis seems to be, at least, influenced by that Indian phonological awareness. Thus my comment.
As for Tzuro script, I think it's all described in the Historical Atlas. Skourene writing system being based on Wedei/Axunashin is, however, described in the Old Skourene article.
As for Tzuro script, I think it's all described in the Historical Atlas. Skourene writing system being based on Wedei/Axunashin is, however, described in the Old Skourene article.
"Ez amnar o amnar e cauč."
- Daneydzaus
- Daneydzaus
- Thomas Winwood
- Lebom
- Posts: 105
- Joined: Sat Dec 14, 2002 7:47 am
- Contact:
That's Sanskrit linguistics being carried by Buddhism via China into Japan and Korea. Most sources give the idea that Hangul is graphically based on seal-script variants of Phags-pa as "disputed", but that seems to me like people are refusing to just go ahead and say it's true because there's three or four eighty-year-olds still adamantly denying it.Yiuel wrote:The way consonants and vowels are ordered in Extreme East Asia (Japan and Korea) has a striking ressemblance to how phonemes are ordered in Ancient India.
-
- Avisaru
- Posts: 409
- Joined: Thu Sep 07, 2006 12:25 pm
Thanks, I almost forgot about that whole script unification business.brandrinn wrote:He's probably talking about Phags-pa, which was developed by Tibetans and loosely based on the Tibetan script. That theory is not universally accepted, though Joseon Koreans would certainly be aware of Phags-pa and other ultimately Brahmi-inspired scripts.
If influence such as an indirect transmission of ideas isn't allowed, then writing really was discovered 3/4 times on Earth. The Koreans didn't invent writing, of course, but they did, like the Greeks, take the final leap to a pure alphabetic system on their own with no help from foreign scholars or ilii.Yiuel wrote:I was actually referring to phonological awareness, more than any influence over the shape of things. The way consonants and vowels are ordered in Extreme East Asia (Japan and Korea) has a striking ressemblance to how phonemes are ordered in Ancient India. The whole Hangul concept may be a local innovation, but its phonological basis seems to be, at least, influenced by that Indian phonological awareness. Thus my comment.
The Cia-Cia even adopted a Hangul Koreanization for reasons I dare not speculate upon: http://thejakartaglobe.com/home/southea ... gue/322636 ("reflects our efforts for years to spread Hangul abroad"? wtf)
How can it be a derivative of OS and a featural alphabet at the same time? (is triutta a featural system?) Never mind, I'll the go through the Historical Atlas again. The last I opened it was around the time of Axunashin, I think.Yiuel wrote:As for Tzuro script, I think it's all described in the Historical Atlas. Skourene writing system being based on Wedei/Axunashin is, however, described in the Old Skourene article.
If you hold a cat by the tail you learn things you cannot learn any other way. - Mark Twain
In reality, our greatest blessings come to us by way of madness, which indeed is a divine gift. - Socrates
In reality, our greatest blessings come to us by way of madness, which indeed is a divine gift. - Socrates
I did some quick Googling, and yep, the orders of the letters in Japanese are pretty obviously influenced by the Brahmi family of scripts. For example:
Devanagari: K CH T (N?) P
Phags-pa: K CH T N P (M?)
Kana: K S T N P
But Hangul doesn't fit the pattern quite so well. The order of Korean letters is: K N T L M P S... etc. K still comes first, and T comes before P, but otherwise the order is messed up. Maybe it's a recent thing.
Devanagari: K CH T (N?) P
Phags-pa: K CH T N P (M?)
Kana: K S T N P
But Hangul doesn't fit the pattern quite so well. The order of Korean letters is: K N T L M P S... etc. K still comes first, and T comes before P, but otherwise the order is messed up. Maybe it's a recent thing.
[quote="Nortaneous"]Is South Africa better off now than it was a few decades ago?[/quote]
Imagine my surprise.Serali wrote:I have never heard of this...
The alphabetic sequence (collating sequence) does not necessarily need to match closely, if you look at the modern Latin Alphabet, it is at least as removed with regards to sequence from whence it came.brandrinn wrote:But Hangul doesn't fit the pattern quite so well. The order of Korean letters is: K N T L M P S... etc. K still comes first, and T comes before P, but otherwise the order is messed up. Maybe it's a recent thing.
Not at all... the exact order of the Semitic alphabet was preserved in Greek, and thence to Latin. The changes are due to sound change, dropped letters, and added ones (usually added at the end).sano wrote:The alphabetic sequence (collating sequence) does not necessarily need to match closely, if you look at the modern Latin Alphabet, it is at least as removed with regards to sequence from whence it came.
Ok, but the change of order that occurred was just as significant as that from the obvious Brahmic derived scripts, which is the point I was actually trying to make. I wasn't really commenting on the reasons for the change of order.zompist wrote:Not at all... the exact order of the Semitic alphabet was preserved in Greek, and thence to Latin. The changes are due to sound change, dropped letters, and added ones (usually added at the end).
And my point is that there was no change of order. The Roman alphabet is precisely the same order as the Semitic:
A = ʔalep
B = bet
C = gimel
D = dalet
E = he
F = waw
(G is an innovation from C)
H = ħet
I = jod
K = kappa
L = lamed
M = mem
N = nun
O = ʕajin
P = pe
Q = qop
R = resh
S = šin
T = tau
(remaining letters added in Greek or Latin)
A = ʔalep
B = bet
C = gimel
D = dalet
E = he
F = waw
(G is an innovation from C)
H = ħet
I = jod
K = kappa
L = lamed
M = mem
N = nun
O = ʕajin
P = pe
Q = qop
R = resh
S = šin
T = tau
(remaining letters added in Greek or Latin)