Sound Change Quickie Thread

Substantial postings about constructed languages and constructed worlds in general. Good place to mention your own or evaluate someone else's. Put quick questions in C&C Quickies instead.
User avatar
Tropylium⁺
Lebom
Lebom
Posts: 77
Joined: Fri Nov 19, 2010 4:21 pm
Location: Finland

Re: Sound Change Quickie Thread

Post by Tropylium⁺ »

North Samic has *k̆s :> *ɣs :> *vs.

For *sʷ, how about something like :> *sw :> skw?
Not actually new.

User avatar
Mbwa
Lebom
Lebom
Posts: 142
Joined: Sat Aug 18, 2007 1:48 pm

Re: Sound Change Quickie Thread

Post by Mbwa »

I'm thinking of losing a retroflex series /ʈ ɖ ʂ ʐ/ like this:

ʈ > k
ɖ > r
ʂ > ʃ
ʐ > ʒ

well the only change i'm really doubting is ʈ > k, dunno if a little context would help at all. I am really only doing that cuz I like [k], and it would make irregular k~r alternations, but I may end up going with ʈ > t or r.
p_>-ts_>k_>-k_>k_>-pSSSSS

Astraios
Sumerul
Sumerul
Posts: 2974
Joined: Fri Mar 05, 2010 2:38 am
Location: Israel

Re: Sound Change Quickie Thread

Post by Astraios »

Mbwa wrote:well the only change i'm really doubting is ʈ > k, dunno if a little context would help at all. I am really only doing that cuz I like [k], and it would make irregular k~r alternations, but I may end up going with ʈ > t or r.
If it went from a true retroflex (i.e. curling backwards the tongue) to a post-alveolar or something before it became a /k/, it doesn't seem too implausible.

User avatar
Mbwa
Lebom
Lebom
Posts: 142
Joined: Sat Aug 18, 2007 1:48 pm

Re: Sound Change Quickie Thread

Post by Mbwa »

yeah, i could have the /ʈ/ be a laminal retroflex, then have it velarise.
p_>-ts_>k_>-k_>k_>-pSSSSS

User avatar
roninbodhisattva
Avisaru
Avisaru
Posts: 568
Joined: Sun Mar 05, 2006 11:50 pm
Location: California

Re: Sound Change Quickie Thread

Post by roninbodhisattva »

Anybody know of anything like /r:/ > /dr/ or /l:/ > /dl/?

Cedh
Sanno
Sanno
Posts: 938
Joined: Tue Nov 14, 2006 10:30 am
Location: Tübingen, Germany
Contact:

Re: Sound Change Quickie Thread

Post by Cedh »

roninbodhisattva wrote:Anybody know of anything like /r:/ > /dr/ or /l:/ > /dl/?
[lː] > [tl˳] happened in Icelandic (and also [nː rn rl] > [tn˳ (r)tn˳ (r)tl˳]).

User avatar
roninbodhisattva
Avisaru
Avisaru
Posts: 568
Joined: Sun Mar 05, 2006 11:50 pm
Location: California

Re: Sound Change Quickie Thread

Post by roninbodhisattva »

cedh audmanh wrote:
roninbodhisattva wrote:Anybody know of anything like /r:/ > /dr/ or /l:/ > /dl/?
[lː] > [tl˳] happened in Icelandic.
True story, I forgot about that. I'm thinking of doing this, in the end:

*hr- > sr- > ʂ-
*-r:- > -dr- > -ɖ-
*hl- > ɬ-
*-l:- > dl > (d)ɮ > ɬ-

The dashes showing the position of vowels.

User avatar
Mbwa
Lebom
Lebom
Posts: 142
Joined: Sat Aug 18, 2007 1:48 pm

Re: Sound Change Quickie Thread

Post by Mbwa »

This isn't a sound change, but....

My conlang Tazic has a vowel system /a i 1 u a: i: u:/. Stress falls on the first syllable with a long vowel, but I have this other rule: on either side of the stressed syllable, vowels must match in length. So you could have CaC1'Ca:Cu but not CaC1'Ca:CuCi: or whatever.

Does this seem plausible?
p_>-ts_>k_>-k_>k_>-pSSSSS

User avatar
Nortaneous
Sumerul
Sumerul
Posts: 4544
Joined: Mon Apr 13, 2009 1:52 am
Location: the Imperial Corridor

Re: Sound Change Quickie Thread

Post by Nortaneous »

^ My gut reaction is no, but I wouldn't be surprised if it turned up somewhere. Come up with sound changes that would lead to that and it'll be fine, I'd say.

I need a good way to keep the dynamic negative copula forms in Arve distinct. Right now they're formed by the (very suppletive) negative auxiliary san/zigg/sambe + gerund(?) form (also the citation form) of the dynamic verb trei, although massive amounts of reduction has left the forms mostly indistinct. For example, the active singular, active plural, and passive plural are zigg trei, ziggs treis, and zeijer trei, pronounced [t͡sɪˈʈ͡ʂʌi̯], [t͡sɪʂˈʈ͡ʂʌi̯s], and [t͡sɪçˈʈ͡ʂʌi̯]. I was thinking I could introduce tone, but I'm not sure how much it'd appear outside the verb forms, since it'd obviously come from syllable reduction. For example, since zigg and ziggs only have one syllable in their full forms, but zeijer has two ([ˈt͡sɛh], [ˈt͡sɛç], [ˈt͡sʌi̯jɐ]), some sort of pitch accent thing could come in and make zeijer trei something like [t͡sɪç˥˩ˈʈ͡ʂʌi̯] or [t͡sɪçˈʈ͡ʂʌi̯˩˥]. I'd obviously prefer the second option, since it seems much less messy to have tone only appear on stressed syllables.

How realistic is that?
Siöö jandeng raiglin zåbei tandiüłåd;
nää džunnfin kukuch vklaivei sivei tåd.
Chei. Chei. Chei. Chei. Chei. Chei. Chei.

Bob Johnson
Avisaru
Avisaru
Posts: 704
Joined: Fri Dec 03, 2010 9:41 am
Location: NY, USA

Re: Sound Change Quickie Thread

Post by Bob Johnson »

Mbwa wrote:Stress falls on the first syllable with a long vowel, but I have this other rule: on either side of the stressed syllable, vowels must match in length.
In other words: the syllable after the stress must have a short vowel, unless the stress is word-initial. You can't have L"LL mid-word because the stress would move to the first of the long vowels, so it's always S"LS mid-word. This seams fairly reasonable: V: → V / "V:C_ and not the second syllable. (Or always -- your post didn't make clear how the "match in length" applies to the word boundary.)

User avatar
Mbwa
Lebom
Lebom
Posts: 142
Joined: Sat Aug 18, 2007 1:48 pm

Re: Sound Change Quickie Thread

Post by Mbwa »

hito wrote:
Mbwa wrote:Stress falls on the first syllable with a long vowel, but I have this other rule: on either side of the stressed syllable, vowels must match in length.
In other words: the syllable after the stress must have a short vowel, unless the stress is word-initial.
No, I mean you can have short vowels or long vowels on either side of the stressed syllable, but no side can have a combination of the 2. So you can have [short][short][stress][long]long] or [long][long][stress][short][short] but not [long][short][stress][long][short]
p_>-ts_>k_>-k_>k_>-pSSSSS

Bob Johnson
Avisaru
Avisaru
Posts: 704
Joined: Fri Dec 03, 2010 9:41 am
Location: NY, USA

Re: Sound Change Quickie Thread

Post by Bob Johnson »

Mbwa wrote:Stress falls on the first syllable with a long vowel
Mbwa wrote:[long][long][stress][short][short]
Wouldn't the stress be word-initial then?

Also, pitch contour: high pitch became long vowel, or something like that. The stressed syllable is where the actual contour was. Words could start high and stay high, or change to low at one point, and so on.

User avatar
cybrxkhan
Avisaru
Avisaru
Posts: 303
Joined: Sun Mar 09, 2008 11:27 pm

Re: Sound Change Quickie Thread

Post by cybrxkhan »

If a language has ejectives, and somehow loses them, what would the ejectives usually turn into?

Thanks in advance.
I have a blog, unfortunately: http://imperialsenate.wordpress.com/
I think I think, therefore I think I am.

lctrgzmn
Sanci
Sanci
Posts: 74
Joined: Sun Feb 06, 2011 1:28 am
Location: Katy, Texas
Contact:

Re: Sound Change Quickie Thread

Post by lctrgzmn »

Does this come off as strange?

g -> ɣ -> j

My entire phonology has been, for the most part, sufficiently worked on, but I'm thinking of making /g, ɣ/ illegal before all consonants (/ɣ/ already becomes /x/ before voiceless stops), so a sequence like magret would be pronounced /maj.ɾet/, etc. Essentially, I'd be forcing /g, ɣ/ to create a falling diphthong.

Apart from that, I'm thinking of distributing allophones to unstressed vowels, such as /e/ becoming [ɨ] when immediately preceding and succeeding a stressed vowel, such as hiándenighy would be pronounced /ˈjan.dɨ.ni.jɪ/.

I'm probably going to make the above changes occur either way, but I'd like to hear some feedback.

User avatar
roninbodhisattva
Avisaru
Avisaru
Posts: 568
Joined: Sun Mar 05, 2006 11:50 pm
Location: California

Re: Sound Change Quickie Thread

Post by roninbodhisattva »

No, that's not at all a strange sound shift.

User avatar
Mbwa
Lebom
Lebom
Posts: 142
Joined: Sat Aug 18, 2007 1:48 pm

Re: Sound Change Quickie Thread

Post by Mbwa »

dude, that definitely works.
p_>-ts_>k_>-k_>k_>-pSSSSS

User avatar
Herra Ratatoskr
Avisaru
Avisaru
Posts: 308
Joined: Thu Mar 25, 2004 5:26 pm
Location: Missouri (loves company!)

Re: Sound Change Quickie Thread

Post by Herra Ratatoskr »

A very similar change happened in English, except the ɣ became j or w depending on the environment. If the preceding vowel was front, ɣ had already become j by the Old English period. If ɣ followed a back vowel, it became w. That's why we have words like "bow" (as in "bow and arrow"), where German has "Bogen".

Other English (Old English) vs German examples:
day (dæg) vs Tag
rain (regn) vs Regen
eye (eage) vs Auge
-y (-ig) vs -ig

So yeah, very reasonable change.
I am Ratatosk, Norse Squirrel of Strife!

There are 10 types of people in this world:
-Those who understand binary
-Those who don't

Mater tua circeta ibat et pater tuus sambucorum olficiebat!

User avatar
Mbwa
Lebom
Lebom
Posts: 142
Joined: Sat Aug 18, 2007 1:48 pm

Re: Sound Change Quickie Thread

Post by Mbwa »

I thought of a way I could justify it: an earlier form of the language had 2 tones: high and low. There was a sort of tone harmony, with basically the same rules I described. stress fell on the first high tone syllable, and EXCEPT FOR this stressed syllable, adjacent vowels must match in tone.

high tone > +length
p_>-ts_>k_>-k_>k_>-pSSSSS

Atom
Lebom
Lebom
Posts: 86
Joined: Sun Dec 21, 2008 1:51 pm

Re: Sound Change Quickie Thread

Post by Atom »

My conlang Alakan has a set of pharyngeals (ʕ and ħ to be precise) and I've been trying to think of interesting things to do with them, specifically, I'm trying to imagine what processes could create them from other consonants. The full set of consonants are (in IPA):
Plosives: p t̪ tʃ k kʷ ʔ
Implosives: ɓ ̪ɗ
Nasals: m n ŋ
Fricatives: f v s z ʃ ʒ x h ħ
Laterals: l ɬ
Trills: r
approximant: j w ʕ

The vowels are a very basic five cardinal vowels, and there is productive raising, fronting, and backing patterns of ablaut, along with quite a bit of consonant mutation (which is what I want to create some kind of pharyngealization effect going).
Last edited by Atom on Sun Feb 27, 2011 9:23 pm, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
finlay
Sumerul
Sumerul
Posts: 3600
Joined: Mon Dec 22, 2003 12:35 pm
Location: Tokyo

Re: Sound Change Quickie Thread

Post by finlay »

ʕ isn't a semivowel; j and w are because they're the equivalent of i and u in consonant form. You want the term "approximant".

Atom
Lebom
Lebom
Posts: 86
Joined: Sun Dec 21, 2008 1:51 pm

Re: Sound Change Quickie Thread

Post by Atom »

finlay wrote:ʕ isn't a semivowel; j and w are because they're the equivalent of i and u in consonant form. You want the term "approximant".
Right. Sorry about that.

User avatar
Ser
Smeric
Smeric
Posts: 1542
Joined: Sat Jul 19, 2008 1:55 am
Location: Vancouver, British Columbia / Colombie Britannique, Canada

Re: Sound Change Quickie Thread

Post by Ser »

finlay wrote:ʕ isn't a semivowel
I sometimes wonder if it could be possible to say that ʕ is a consonant ɑ though...

tezcatlip0ca
Avisaru
Avisaru
Posts: 385
Joined: Fri Mar 12, 2010 6:30 pm

Re: Sound Change Quickie Thread

Post by tezcatlip0ca »

Renaçido wrote:
finlay wrote:ʕ isn't a semivowel
I sometimes wonder if it could be possible to say that ʕ is a consonant ɑ though...
Mii thuu.
The Conlanger Formerly Known As Aiďos

8Deer
Lebom
Lebom
Posts: 122
Joined: Thu Dec 02, 2010 12:48 am

Re: Sound Change Quickie Thread

Post by 8Deer »

My protolang has a set of voiceless stops: p t k q. T was sometimes pronounced ɾ intervocally, especially in informal/quick speech. Eventually, t shifted completely to ɾ. I want this to cause a chain shift with k becoming t and q becoming k to fill in the gaps. I understand something similar happened in Hawaiian. Is this plausible?

User avatar
roninbodhisattva
Avisaru
Avisaru
Posts: 568
Joined: Sun Mar 05, 2006 11:50 pm
Location: California

Re: Sound Change Quickie Thread

Post by roninbodhisattva »

Yes.

Post Reply