Man... Don't get my started on the Dutch Public Transportation Card...treskro wrote:You could just have a deductible card that automatically subtracts the appropriate fare from your balance.
JAL
Man... Don't get my started on the Dutch Public Transportation Card...treskro wrote:You could just have a deductible card that automatically subtracts the appropriate fare from your balance.
vergeet niet in en uit-checken met uw OV-chip kaartjal wrote:Man... Don't get my started on the Dutch Public Transportation Card...


They don't build upwards in Stockholm because "it would ruin the city's silhouette". Ugh, lamest excuse ever.田中竜字 wrote:Well, that's why you build cities up. I cannot, for the life of me understand why people would build outward and make things less convenient for themselves. But yeah, I agree with the notion of distance based fare, but, think, for a system like the MTA, for now at least, the unified-fare system is the best and most efficient way to go.
That's the same as the oyster, octopus, ov-chipkaart, etc. I think the octopus in Hong Kong came first, roughly. The fact that you check out and in makes the stratified fare thing possible. In London they only use zones in the underground, but buses are one price, IIRC, because you only check in and not out. But there, before oyster cards were introduced, and still available if you don't bother buying one, your ticket is only valid for certain zones, or something. You have to put it in the machine to get out. You can't really do that with buses, the way they're generally set up, but you can with metros – you can put barriers in the stations – which is why it mystifies me that NYC haven't done it.Nortaneous wrote:DC does the stratified price thing, but we have farecards, so you don't have to worry about anything except having enough money on the farecard. No pissing around with sticking coins in the machine in order to get in.
Of course, it's like $5 to get anywhere, but...


They started using the card in the Northern provinces just two or three weeks ago, so no doubt the old paper cards are still accepted.Guitarplayer wrote:I hope it'll still be possible in Groningen in May to get around by bus without buying one of those OV card.
Almost correct: "vergeet niet in en uit te checken met uw OV-chipkaart" [emphasis not in actual speech]. Alternatively, there might be an "om" before "in", but that's grammatical optional.Simmalti wrote:vergeet niet in en uit-checken met uw OV-chip kaart
Lies. All lies. They have one sign per station, hidden behind a trash can. It is awful compared to any other I have ever used, ever. Honestly, I have found it easier to use ones in languages I do not understand than get the subway in NY.田中竜字 wrote:The subway system is easy to navigate, that's why they have signs, and maps, all you really need to know is which station you're in and which train you want.
Haha thanks. For someone who doesn't speak Dutch at all, I think I did pretty welljal wrote:Almost correct: "vergeet niet in en uit te checken met uw OV-chipkaart" [emphasis not in actual speech]. Alternatively, there might be an "om" before "in", but that's grammatical optional.Simmalti wrote:vergeet niet in en uit-checken met uw OV-chip kaart
JAL
Agreed. MOAR photos Gulliver!Gulliver wrote:But we digress. Back to photowhoring.
That's either massive hyperbole (at the trash can thing and the one sign thing) or massive extrapolation ("they" = "they all" to me when I read that. I kind of wanted to say "of Eddy-magnitude" but I didn't want to offend youGulliver wrote:Lies. All lies. They have one sign per station, hidden behind a trash can.


That is a fetching apron you're wearing there.Matt wrote:Photos were taken of me for the first time in over a year on Sunday (not counting ones I've taken with my phone). Here's one of them:
Salmoneus wrote:(NB Dewrad is behaving like an adult - a petty, sarcastic and uncharitable adult, admittedly, but none the less note the infinitely higher quality of flame)
No, she's not. Just a close friend and classmate.Guitarplayer wrote:Is that your girlfriend? Looks pretty.
Dutch is easy, though.Simmalti wrote:Haha thanks. For someone who doesn't speak Dutch at all, I think I did pretty welljal wrote:Almost correct: "vergeet niet in en uit te checken met uw OV-chipkaart" [emphasis not in actual speech]. Alternatively, there might be an "om" before "in", but that's grammatical optional.Simmalti wrote:vergeet niet in en uit-checken met uw OV-chip kaart
JAL
Indeed. Until, when you think you speak the language, you are pointed to the 20 widely different meanings of "wel". Then you weep. A long time.finlay wrote:Dutch is easy, though.
I'd like to learn it one day, and I MIGHT be studying there soon (hopefully) so that's an incentive...jal wrote:Indeed. Until, when you think you speak the language, you are pointed to the 20 widely different meanings of "wel". Then you weep. A long time.
JAL
Cool, what and where are you going to study?Simmalti wrote:I'd like to learn it one day, and I MIGHT be studying there soon (hopefully) so that's an incentive...