ZBB member photos, part 5. (Something for the weekend, sir?)
Re: ZBB member photos, part 5. (save the exhibitionism threa
You don't look blond on any of the previous pictures I've seen, must be light, I don't think any of them was taken outside.
Re: ZBB member photos, part 5. (save the exhibitionism threa
I agree with this. Y'all are adoooooorable (even if you're not a couple, what do I know).Viktor77 wrote:You guys look like you're a cute couple.
What inspired the trip?
Re: ZBB member photos, part 5. (save the exhibitionism threa
Rad looks like he has lost weight - it suits him!
But come on - not even an awkward little smile?
But come on - not even an awkward little smile?
- Radius Solis
- Smeric

- Posts: 1248
- Joined: Tue Mar 30, 2004 5:40 pm
- Location: Si'ahl
- Contact:
Re: ZBB member photos, part 5. (save the exhibitionism threa
Pictures in which I'm smiling tend to be my least attractive ones. With a straight face I can sometimes get away with "handsome" in a good light, like here. But when I smile in pictures I look like one of the kids who rides the short bus to school! 
Re: ZBB member photos, part 5. (save the exhibitionism threa
Radius Solis wrote:Pictures in which I'm smiling tend to be my least attractive ones. With a straight face I can sometimes get away with "handsome" in a good light, like here. But when I smile in pictures I look like one of the kids who rides the short bus to school!
I don't blame you, they make fun of my smile here too.
Re: ZBB member photos, part 5. (save the exhibitionism threa
pweetyQueen Xalele wrote:Ero-loli/visual kei photoshoot at Swan Point cemetery.
Re: ZBB member photos, part 5. (save the exhibitionism threa
Looks too much like sho! :)Torco wrote:pweety
Also, if one were to say they'd do her, would that be sexist? If so, is Astraios a sexist? Mmmm, food for thought...
JAL
Re: ZBB member photos, part 5. (save the exhibitionism threa
How is it sexist to say you'd do someone?jal wrote:Also, if one were to say they'd do her, would that be sexist? If so, is Astraios a sexist? Mmmm, food for thought...
-
Bob Johnson
- Avisaru

- Posts: 704
- Joined: Fri Dec 03, 2010 9:41 am
- Location: NY, USA
Re: ZBB member photos, part 5. (save the exhibitionism threa
Remember, complimenting a woman on her appearance is sexual harassment, and complimenting a man isn't; therefore any sort of compliment is gender discrimination.Astraios wrote:How is it sexist to say you'd do someone?jal wrote:Also, if one were to say they'd do her, would that be sexist? If so, is Astraios a sexist? Mmmm, food for thought...Sexism is discriminating against someone for their sex, and how is saying you'd do someone discriminating against them?
Re: ZBB member photos, part 5. (save the exhibitionism threa
Suddenly all has become clear!Bob Johnson wrote:Remember, complimenting a woman on her appearance is sexual harassment, and complimenting a man isn't; therefore any sort of compliment is gender discrimination.
I guess I am a sexist then, because I also think Queen Xalele's pic is pweety.
Re: ZBB member photos, part 5. (save the exhibitionism threa
I don't know if I'd do her, the photo doesn't show anything about her, other than clothes, a bit of eye, and like the fact that she has eyelashes and knees. Still, the photo is pretty, I don't know whether she is as well.
Also, how can it be sexist? because everything you say to a woman that you wouldn't say to a non-woman is sexist, silly.
nah, really, not that I think so, but because it's objectifying her, is the underlying argument, I reckon. As for whether fancying=objectifying, I really don't think so, but I can see why someone would. I get the feeling that said identity depends on the person's underlying conception of attraction; are men be attracted to boobs alone, so to speak? or even to the faint chance of bedding some random female? if yes, then its safe to say that spontaneous and immediate attraction is probably objectifying, if, on the other hand, attraction is more complicated than that and you go "I'd do her/him" because said first impression, be it a photo or whatever, tells you something about who they are as a person, or evokes sort of an infatuation, as opposed to a simple, emotionless, de-humanized will to fuck, then no, it's not.
Myself, I don't think dehumanized will the fuck is the norm; while it's easier for anyone to dismiss unwanted romantic or sexual attraction as such I imagine sexual attraction and other emotional constellations are quite co-ocurrent.
what, too dense for the gay perving thread?
Also, how can it be sexist? because everything you say to a woman that you wouldn't say to a non-woman is sexist, silly.
nah, really, not that I think so, but because it's objectifying her, is the underlying argument, I reckon. As for whether fancying=objectifying, I really don't think so, but I can see why someone would. I get the feeling that said identity depends on the person's underlying conception of attraction; are men be attracted to boobs alone, so to speak? or even to the faint chance of bedding some random female? if yes, then its safe to say that spontaneous and immediate attraction is probably objectifying, if, on the other hand, attraction is more complicated than that and you go "I'd do her/him" because said first impression, be it a photo or whatever, tells you something about who they are as a person, or evokes sort of an infatuation, as opposed to a simple, emotionless, de-humanized will to fuck, then no, it's not.
Myself, I don't think dehumanized will the fuck is the norm; while it's easier for anyone to dismiss unwanted romantic or sexual attraction as such I imagine sexual attraction and other emotional constellations are quite co-ocurrent.
what, too dense for the gay perving thread?
Last edited by Torco on Wed Oct 12, 2011 1:58 pm, edited 1 time in total.
- MisterBernie
- Avisaru

- Posts: 439
- Joined: Sat May 14, 2011 8:46 am
- Location: Oktoberfestonia
Re: ZBB member photos, part 5. (save the exhibitionism threa
...are we going to have this discussion again? I think it's the fourth time since I joined the boards.
Constructed Voices - Another conlanging/conworlding blog.
Latest post: Joyful Birth of the Oiled One
Latest post: Joyful Birth of the Oiled One
Re: ZBB member photos, part 5. (save the exhibitionism threa
Not really. I find some older guys (like 40+) sexually attractive, but no way would I want an emotional attachment to them, for example.Torco wrote:I imagine sexual attraction and other emotional constellations are quite co-ocurrent.
Re: ZBB member photos, part 5. (save the exhibitionism threa
why not?
<King> Ivo, you phrase things in the most comedic manner
[quote="Jal"][quote="jme"]Thats just rude and unneeded.[/quote]That sums up Io, basically. Yet, we all love him.[/quote]
[quote="Jal"][quote="jme"]Thats just rude and unneeded.[/quote]That sums up Io, basically. Yet, we all love him.[/quote]
Re: ZBB member photos, part 5. (save the exhibitionism threa
Because a) it feels wrong, and b) they're going to die in like two days already.
Re: ZBB member photos, part 5. (save the exhibitionism threa
why does it feel wrong?
b) is outright stupid
b) is outright stupid
Last edited by Io on Wed Oct 12, 2011 2:42 pm, edited 1 time in total.
- MisterBernie
- Avisaru

- Posts: 439
- Joined: Sat May 14, 2011 8:46 am
- Location: Oktoberfestonia
Re: ZBB member photos, part 5. (save the exhibitionism threa
IME, with a significant enough age gap, the older guy tends to treat the other like a child rather than an equal partner, and that's annoying and possibly icky. I personally don't want to date a guy who I feel I should call 'mommy'.
Constructed Voices - Another conlanging/conworlding blog.
Latest post: Joyful Birth of the Oiled One
Latest post: Joyful Birth of the Oiled One
Re: ZBB member photos, part 5. (save the exhibitionism threa
Because I'm discriminating against old people, obviously!
Also, what Bernie said.
Also, what Bernie said.
-
Bob Johnson
- Avisaru

- Posts: 704
- Joined: Fri Dec 03, 2010 9:41 am
- Location: NY, USA
Re: ZBB member photos, part 5. (save the exhibitionism threa
Uhh. Should I ask?MisterBernie wrote:a guy who I feel I should call 'mommy'.
Re: ZBB member photos, part 5. (save the exhibitionism threa
so you only find them sexually attractive but wouldn't would them? or you'd would them but wouldn't want an emotional attachment?
i dont have such experience so i wouldn't know how they treat each other.
i dont have such experience so i wouldn't know how they treat each other.
- MisterBernie
- Avisaru

- Posts: 439
- Joined: Sat May 14, 2011 8:46 am
- Location: Oktoberfestonia
Re: ZBB member photos, part 5. (save the exhibitionism threa
I'm referencing a couple I know. Whenever I see the two of them, the older guy is hovering around his boyfriend like a mother hen around her chicks.Bob Johnson wrote:Uhh. Should I ask?
Constructed Voices - Another conlanging/conworlding blog.
Latest post: Joyful Birth of the Oiled One
Latest post: Joyful Birth of the Oiled One
Re: ZBB member photos, part 5. (save the exhibitionism threa
xD lawla guy who I feel I should call 'mommy'.
Re: ZBB member photos, part 5. (save the exhibitionism threa
I might would them, but it depends on how motherhennish they are. If they're motherhennish right from the start, then blergh no, but if they hold it off until the woulding is over, then I would just would them and run away after.Io wrote:so you only find them sexually attractive but wouldn't would them? or you'd would them but wouldn't want an emotional attachment?
Re: ZBB member photos, part 5. (save the exhibitionism threa
well, that's what i dont understand, you'd would them but run away even if they're fine personality wise
Re: ZBB member photos, part 5. (save the exhibitionism threa
Well, no. Motherhennishness is a personality flaw, and that's what'd make me run away, and since it usually ends up like that, I'd run away. If they aren't going to be motherhennish at all then fine, maybe it can be friends as well as just sex.


