Post your conlang's phonology

Substantial postings about constructed languages and constructed worlds in general. Good place to mention your own or evaluate someone else's. Put quick questions in C&C Quickies instead.
User avatar
Izambri
Smeric
Smeric
Posts: 1556
Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2004 4:27 pm
Location: Catalonia

Re: Post your conlang's phonology

Post by Izambri »

Eandil wrote:O_O I didn't expect that one. I mean it's not that hard to pronounce. If I'm not wrong, it'd merge with the equivalent of Spanish pender, "to hang", as in "su vida pende de un hilo", if it exists.
Well, it's not hard, but talking fast (as we usually do in everyday speech) the first r falls [1], so many persons pronounce ['pɛndɾə], even when pronouncing carefully the word.

[1] Otherwise, the second r would be the disappearing consonant, I guess, so we would have prendre ['pɾɛndə], which is really weird. XD But one or the other r must fall.
Un llapis mai dibuixa sense una mà.

Thry
Smeric
Smeric
Posts: 2085
Joined: Tue Oct 04, 2011 12:15 pm
Location: Spain

Re: Post your conlang's phonology

Post by Thry »

Izambri wrote:Well, it's not hard, but talking fast (as we usually do in everyday speech) the first r falls [1], so many persons pronounce ['pɛndɾə], even when pronouncing carefully the word.

[1] Otherwise, the second r would be the disappearing consonant, I guess, so we would have prendre ['pɾɛndə], which is really weird. XD But one or the other r must fall.
You must prendre either one or the other r ;).

User avatar
Izambri
Smeric
Smeric
Posts: 1556
Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2004 4:27 pm
Location: Catalonia

Re: Post your conlang's phonology

Post by Izambri »

Eandil wrote:
Izambri wrote:Well, it's not hard, but talking fast (as we usually do in everyday speech) the first r falls [1], so many persons pronounce ['pɛndɾə], even when pronouncing carefully the word.

[1] Otherwise, the second r would be the disappearing consonant, I guess, so we would have prendre ['pɾɛndə], which is really weird. XD But one or the other r must fall.
You must prendre either one or the other r ;).
Ei, ben trobat! That's the point.
Un llapis mai dibuixa sense una mà.

User avatar
finlay
Sumerul
Sumerul
Posts: 3600
Joined: Mon Dec 22, 2003 12:35 pm
Location: Tokyo

Re: Post your conlang's phonology

Post by finlay »

Izambri wrote:many persons
a lot of people

people people people people people people people people people people people people people people

(the fact that English does have a word "persons" doesn't help, but it's not the regular plural of person)

Thry
Smeric
Smeric
Posts: 2085
Joined: Tue Oct 04, 2011 12:15 pm
Location: Spain

Re: Post your conlang's phonology

Post by Thry »

finlay wrote:
Izambri wrote:many persons
a lot of people
What's wrong with "many people"?

Bristel
Smeric
Smeric
Posts: 1258
Joined: Mon Jun 01, 2009 3:07 pm
Location: Miracle, Inc. Headquarters
Contact:

Re: Post your conlang's phonology

Post by Bristel »

Eandil wrote:
finlay wrote:
Izambri wrote:many persons
a lot of people
What's wrong with "many people"?
Nothing. This is correct as well.
[bɹ̠ˤʷɪs.təɫ]
Nōn quālibet inīquā cupiditāte illectus hoc agō
Yo te pongo en tu lugar...
Taisc mach Daró

User avatar
finlay
Sumerul
Sumerul
Posts: 3600
Joined: Mon Dec 22, 2003 12:35 pm
Location: Tokyo

Re: Post your conlang's phonology

Post by finlay »

Eandil wrote:
finlay wrote:
Izambri wrote:many persons
a lot of people
What's wrong with "many people"?
I.... don't really know, but whenever my spanish students use it it sounds wrong. Maybe it's just your accents :P

also 'so many' is a potential garden path

also 'pronouncing carefully the word' should be 'pronouncing the word carefully'

User avatar
Izambri
Smeric
Smeric
Posts: 1556
Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2004 4:27 pm
Location: Catalonia

Re: Post your conlang's phonology

Post by Izambri »

Finlay, you told me that about persons/people once. Not necessary to repeat it every time you see a wrong use. XD
Un llapis mai dibuixa sense una mà.

User avatar
finlay
Sumerul
Sumerul
Posts: 3600
Joined: Mon Dec 22, 2003 12:35 pm
Location: Tokyo

Re: Post your conlang's phonology

Post by finlay »

sorry, it's just a pet hate. :p

User avatar
Izambri
Smeric
Smeric
Posts: 1556
Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2004 4:27 pm
Location: Catalonia

Re: Post your conlang's phonology

Post by Izambri »

Dolberdican

Consonants

Nasals
ff n gg /ɱ n ŋ/

Oclusives
p b t d k /p b t d k/
c /c/

Fricatives
f v s z ç h /f v s z ç h/
b [β]

Approximants
v [ʋ]
hu /w/ - [ʍ ɥ]

Laterals
l /ɬ/

Affricates
tl ds ph bh dr tr cç /tɬ dz pɸ bβ d_r t_r cç/

Prenasalized
mt md mg np nb nd /mt md mg np nb mt/

Postnasalized
sn zn cn rn /sⁿ cⁿ cⁿ rⁿ/

Preaspirated
hg hf hs hl /ʰg ʰf ʰs ʰɧ/

Coarticulated (double articulations)
mn pb pt pd bk tb tc db cd gd /mn pb pt pd bk tb tc db cd gd/

Coarticulated (secondary articulations)
pm tm fm sm /pm tm fm sm/
pr br kr cr fr sr zr lr /pr br kr cr fr sr zr lr/
cm cf cs cl /cm cf cs cl/
sb sg sc /sb sg sc/
rb rg rf /rb sg rf/

Vowels

i y u /i y u/
ï ÿ ü [ɪ ʏ ʊ]
o /o/
ä ö /ʌ/ [ɔ]
Un llapis mai dibuixa sense una mà.

User avatar
sucaeyl
Lebom
Lebom
Posts: 104
Joined: Fri Sep 09, 2011 2:53 pm

Re: Post your conlang's phonology

Post by sucaeyl »

p pʰ pʼ ʈ ʈʰ ʈʼ c cʰ cʼ k kʰ kʼ q qʰ ʔ
b bʱ ɓ ɖ ɖʱ ᶑ ɟ ɟʱ ʄ g gʱ ɠ
m mʱ n nʱ ɲ ɲʱ ŋ ŋʱ
f fʼ θ θʼ ʂ ʂʰ ɕ̟ ɕ̟ʼ x xʼ ħ h
v vʱ ð ðʱ ʐ ʐʱ ʑ̟ ʑ̟ʱ ɣ ɣʱ
w ɻ j ʟ ʕ
pʂ pʂʰ tθ tθʼ ʈʂ ʈʂʰ t̻ɕ̟ t̻ɕ̟ʼ kʂ kʂʰ
u ɝ i ʊˠ ɑ

Bob Johnson
Avisaru
Avisaru
Posts: 704
Joined: Fri Dec 03, 2010 9:41 am
Location: NY, USA

Re: Post your conlang's phonology

Post by Bob Johnson »

sucaeyl (redacted) wrote:q qʰ
bʱ ɓ
θʼ
ɻ
tθ tθʼ
u ɝ i ʊˠ ɑ
... are you aiming for a cross between Hindi and something Athabaskan? Because you may have succeeded.

User avatar
sucaeyl
Lebom
Lebom
Posts: 104
Joined: Fri Sep 09, 2011 2:53 pm

Re: Post your conlang's phonology

Post by sucaeyl »

Bob Johnson wrote:
sucaeyl (redacted) wrote:q qʰ
bʱ ɓ
θʼ
ɻ
tθ tθʼ
u ɝ i ʊˠ ɑ
... are you aiming for a cross between Hindi and something Athabaskan? Because you may have succeeded.
More specifically Tlingit and Oriya– you're pretty much spot on.

User avatar
Kvan
Lebom
Lebom
Posts: 112
Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2010 3:36 pm

Re: Post your conlang's phonology

Post by Kvan »

sucaeyl wrote:
Bob Johnson wrote:
sucaeyl (redacted) wrote:q qʰ
bʱ ɓ
θʼ
ɻ
tθ tθʼ
u ɝ i ʊˠ ɑ
... are you aiming for a cross between Hindi and something Athabaskan? Because you may have succeeded.
More specifically Tlingit and Oriya– you're pretty much spot on.
u ɝ i ʊˠ ɑ is such a cool vowel system!

Right now in the C&C Quickies section there's a collaboration going 'tween äreo, Ouagadougou and I which I think has a purposefully odd but not over-the-top on phonemes:


Plosives /ʈʰ, qʰ, ʰʈ, ʰq/
Implosives/ɓ, ᶑ/
Ejectives /ʈ', q', ts', tɬ'/
Fricatives /s, ɬ, χ/
Liquids /ɻ/
Nasals /m, ɳ/

Vowels /ɨ, ʉ, ɘ, ɵ, ɜ, ɞ, a, ɶ/

We may add a linguolabial series to the plosives.
From:
Economic Left/Right: -7.25
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -7.69

To:
Economic Left/Right: -6.12
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -5.33

Bristel
Smeric
Smeric
Posts: 1258
Joined: Mon Jun 01, 2009 3:07 pm
Location: Miracle, Inc. Headquarters
Contact:

Re: Post your conlang's phonology

Post by Bristel »

Kvan wrote:
Right now in the C&C Quickies section there's a collaboration going 'tween äreo, Ouagadougou and I which I think has a purposefully odd but not over-the-top on phonemes:
I think my contribution of /tɬʼ/ means I am a collaborator too. ;)

:D
sucaeyl wrote: More specifically Tlingit and Oriya– you're pretty much spot on.
Those are two interesting languages that I'd love to see blended together. Keep working on it!
[bɹ̠ˤʷɪs.təɫ]
Nōn quālibet inīquā cupiditāte illectus hoc agō
Yo te pongo en tu lugar...
Taisc mach Daró

User avatar
sucaeyl
Lebom
Lebom
Posts: 104
Joined: Fri Sep 09, 2011 2:53 pm

Re: Post your conlang's phonology

Post by sucaeyl »

Kvan wrote:u ɝ i ʊˠ ɑ is such a cool vowel system!
Thanks. I'd have to agree.
Bristel wrote:
sucaeyl wrote: More specifically Tlingit and Oriya– you're pretty much spot on.
Those are two interesting languages that I'd love to see blended together. Keep working on it!
Yeah, I think it should come out interestingly. I'll post more once I've figured out grammar.

User avatar
Nortaneous
Sumerul
Sumerul
Posts: 4544
Joined: Mon Apr 13, 2009 1:52 am
Location: the Imperial Corridor

Re: Post your conlang's phonology

Post by Nortaneous »

tentative Kien inventory/orthography:

/p t t͡s t͡ʃ k/ <p t c ç k> in high-toned syllables, <b d j ḑ g> in low-toned syllables
/f v ð s z ʃ x ɣ/ <f v * s z ş h *>
/m n ŋ p͡m t͡n k͡ŋ/ <m n ng pm/bm tn/dn kn/gn>
/j ɥ w/ <i y u>
/a e ø o i y u/ <a e ơ o i y u> (all vowels can be long, indicated by doubling the vowel, nasal, indicated by a following <n>, or both)

tones: high, mid, low, high rising, low rising, high falling, low falling: <é e è ẽ ě ê ẻ>

* /ð/ before a front vowel is written <đ>, as is /ɣ/ before a back vowel; the two are in complementary distribution in native vocabulary. When /ð/ appears before a back vowel, it is written <đh>. /ɣ/ cannot appear before front vowels.

example words:

*kambéccera :> knéşìì [k͡ŋéʃìː]
*tweccáre :> çuaai [t͡ʃwāːj]
*láncakkom :> đanàn [ɣānã̀]
*sérhes :> sóói [sóːj]
*cerráison :> kiêin [kjẽ˥˧j] (had to switch tone marking systems in the transcription there...)

syllable structure looks like it's going to be C(G)VC, but i'm not sure how limited the last C is. there might be a marginal (contrastive, but only appearing word-initially before glides) glottal stop; i don't know if the sound changes will play out that way yet, but if they don't, i'll probably make them.
Siöö jandeng raiglin zåbei tandiüłåd;
nää džunnfin kukuch vklaivei sivei tåd.
Chei. Chei. Chei. Chei. Chei. Chei. Chei.

User avatar
Nortaneous
Sumerul
Sumerul
Posts: 4544
Joined: Mon Apr 13, 2009 1:52 am
Location: the Imperial Corridor

Re: Post your conlang's phonology

Post by Nortaneous »

And here's the Proto-Arve-Gadaye inventory: (hellooooo Marshallese)

Code: Select all

consonants:
m mˠ n ɲ ŋ          <m m̧ n ņ g>
p pˠ t c k ʔ        <p b t j k '>
ɸ ɸˠ s ʃ x h        <v w s ş h>
     ɬ ɬʲ           <l ļ>
       j            <y>

vowels:
i ɯ    iə ɯə uə     <i u>   <ie ue ü>
e   o  ei əɯ ou     <ee oo>   <ei au ou>
  a                 <a>
  
ɪ̆ ʊ̆ <e o>
+ long vowels

Might add /tˠ/ so I can develop a rhotic later on.
Siöö jandeng raiglin zåbei tandiüłåd;
nää džunnfin kukuch vklaivei sivei tåd.
Chei. Chei. Chei. Chei. Chei. Chei. Chei.

User avatar
Skomakar'n
Smeric
Smeric
Posts: 1273
Joined: Tue Aug 18, 2009 8:05 pm

Re: Post your conlang's phonology

Post by Skomakar'n »

Nortaneous wrote:And here's the Proto-Arve-Gadaye inventory: (hellooooo Marshallese)

Code: Select all

consonants:
m mˠ n ɲ ŋ          <m m̧ n ņ g>
p pˠ t c k ʔ        <p b t j k '>
ɸ ɸˠ s ʃ x h        <v w s ş h>
     ɬ ɬʲ           <l ļ>
       j            <y>

vowels:
i ɯ    iə ɯə uə     <i u>   <ie ue ü>
e   o  ei əɯ ou     <ee oo>   <ei au ou>
  a                 <a>
  
ɪ̆ ʊ̆ <e o>
+ long vowels

Might add /tˠ/ so I can develop a rhotic later on.
Is this my fault?
Online dictionary for my conlang Vanga: http://royalrailway.com/tungumaalMiin/Vanga/

#undef FEMALE

I'd love for you to try my game out! Here's the forum thread about it:
http://zbb.spinnwebe.com/viewtopic.php?f=5&t=36688

Of an Ernst'ian one.

User avatar
Nortaneous
Sumerul
Sumerul
Posts: 4544
Joined: Mon Apr 13, 2009 1:52 am
Location: the Imperial Corridor

Re: Post your conlang's phonology

Post by Nortaneous »

...er, how would it be? it's a pretty generic micronesian lang, except with extrashort vowels.
Siöö jandeng raiglin zåbei tandiüłåd;
nää džunnfin kukuch vklaivei sivei tåd.
Chei. Chei. Chei. Chei. Chei. Chei. Chei.

User avatar
finlay
Sumerul
Sumerul
Posts: 3600
Joined: Mon Dec 22, 2003 12:35 pm
Location: Tokyo

Re: Post your conlang's phonology

Post by finlay »

Sko posted a screenshot of Marshallese from Wikipedia the other day... to me it seems overanalysed, because for instance, a word <aaet> was described as something like [ʕɑæɛeɤt] – as if it's important to cover every point that the tongue passes over during its journey. Most languages probably do something similar to some extent, it's just that we generally only mark the nucleus and not the transition in the IPA.

User avatar
Nortaneous
Sumerul
Sumerul
Posts: 4544
Joined: Mon Apr 13, 2009 1:52 am
Location: the Imperial Corridor

Re: Post your conlang's phonology

Post by Nortaneous »

finlay wrote:Sko posted a screenshot of Marshallese from Wikipedia the other day...
Oh, right. I'd been planning to do a Micronesian lang for a while anyway, so.
to me it seems overanalysed, because for instance, a word <aaet> was described as something like [ʕɑæɛeɤt] – as if it's important to cover every point that the tongue passes over during its journey. Most languages probably do something similar to some extent, it's just that we generally only mark the nucleus and not the transition in the IPA.
It is an elegant analysis, but one far too low-level for normal use. Notice how they had to throw in consonants that do nothing but color the vowel, and allow them to cluster freely with other consonants, to get the vertical vowel system to stick.
Siöö jandeng raiglin zåbei tandiüłåd;
nää džunnfin kukuch vklaivei sivei tåd.
Chei. Chei. Chei. Chei. Chei. Chei. Chei.

User avatar
Qwynegold
Smeric
Smeric
Posts: 1606
Joined: Thu May 24, 2007 11:34 pm
Location: Stockholm

Re: Post your conlang's phonology

Post by Qwynegold »

Izambri wrote:d_r t_r/
Raised plosives?
Izambri wrote:/mt md mg np nb mt/
Non-homorganic prenasals? :?
Izambri wrote:/ʰɧ/
Wut??
Izambri wrote:Coarticulated (double articulations)
mn pb pt pd bk tb tc db cd gd /mn pb pt pd bk tb tc db cd gd/

Coarticulated (secondary articulations)
pm tm fm sm /pm tm fm sm/
pr br kr cr fr sr zr lr /pr br kr cr fr sr zr lr/
cm cf cs cl /cm cf cs cl/
sb sg sc /sb sg sc/
rb rg rf /rb sg rf/
Does this language actually have any consonant clusters?
Image
My most recent quiz:
Eurovision Song Contest 2018

User avatar
Izambri
Smeric
Smeric
Posts: 1556
Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2004 4:27 pm
Location: Catalonia

Re: Post your conlang's phonology

Post by Izambri »

Qwynegold wrote:
Izambri wrote:d_r t_r/
Raised plosives?
Trilled affricates: [dʳ] and [tʳ] respectively. I forgot to write them correctly.
Izambri wrote:/mt md mg np nb mt/
Non-homorganic prenasals? :?
Oh, first of all, typo. It should be mt md mg np nb nd /mt md mg np nb nd/ (so the last one is /nd/, not /mt/). They come from m+(t, d, g) and n+(p, b, d).

On the other hand, you can read that as /nt nd ŋg mp mb nd/ if you wish. At least is true for Modern Dolberdican.
Izambri wrote:/ʰɧ/
Wut??
The evolution of ll /ɬ:/, which gave hl /hɬ/ or /ʰɬ/, causing, in Modern Dolb. > /ʰɧ/ > /ɧ/ (with lengthening of the previous vowel). The penultimate step, /ʰɧ/, is more a convention than a real pronounciation, the superscript <h> marking that tendency to lengthen the previous vowel.

källi [kʌɬ:i] » kähli [kʌhɬi] or [kʌʰɬi] » kähli [kʌ:ɧi].
Izambri wrote:Coarticulated (double articulations)
mn pb pt pd bk tb tc db cd gd /mn pb pt pd bk tb tc db cd gd/

Coarticulated (secondary articulations)
pm tm fm sm /pm tm fm sm/
pr br kr cr fr sr zr lr /pr br kr cr fr sr zr lr/
cm cf cs cl /cm cf cs cl/
sb sg sc /sb sg sc/
rb rg rf /rb sg rf/
Does this language actually have any consonant clusters?
Both coarticulated are only found in prenuclear positions. Double articulations only at the beginning of a word, while secondary articulations at the beginning and the middle of a word.
Last edited by Izambri on Wed Nov 02, 2011 2:13 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Un llapis mai dibuixa sense una mà.

Bob Johnson
Avisaru
Avisaru
Posts: 704
Joined: Fri Dec 03, 2010 9:41 am
Location: NY, USA

Re: Post your conlang's phonology

Post by Bob Johnson »

Izambri wrote:[ɧ]
You sure about that?

Post Reply