The problem with the big numbers is that they look different depending on how you look at them. It's a anti-counterfeit measure, but I can't reproduce it properly. It's about how light affects the big numbers: sometimes you see them with the color of the banknote, sometimes you see them with another color, the one you can see in the upper-right number in the reverse of every note. So, for example, the big number in the 10 banknote can be seen with shades of yellow and shades of blue. That only works for the big numbers, not the "ARAS" letters attached to the right, which are always the color they show.finlay wrote:You've used the same colour as the background on every note, though. I think the 10 and the 500 are worse for it. You could have it a lighter or darker shade of the same colour, perhaps, but I'd maybe give it a bold outline. The only reason to have a massive numeral is to cater for people with sight issues, anyway, so if you've got numerals that are then difficult to read for some people you're failing in that regard. (I'm also talking about every note here, just in case you missed that...)
Here I don't understand what you mean with designs and design; does the plural mean the geometric-pattern designs and the singular the figures?They're quite nice, though, and I like them.. The only other thing I'd say is that many of the designs don't seem to be "well-integrated" with the design in some ways, like it's obvious you've just copy-pasted them over the rest of the banknotes, and it might work better if the cross-hatching patterns extended over them, if that makes sense.
