Odd natlang features thread
Re: Odd natlang features thread
Drehet has this phoneme inventory; like a number of other Oceanic languages it has a prenasalized trill (in this case, the only prenasalized segment in the inventory). It also has only one aspirate, /kʰ/. Also, the Arapahoan languages don't have any low vowels, e.g. the vowels of Arapaho and Gros Ventre are /i(:) ɨ(:) ɛ(:) ɔ(:)/ (historical *a(:) changed to *o(:) in Proto-Arapahoan, whose vowel inventory was: */i i: e e: o o:/). Unfortunately detailed stuff on the exact phonetics involved aren't easy to come by (plus Gros Ventre is basically dead now), but it definitely seems like the normal realizations of the latter two vowels are [ɛ] and [ɔ] (except /ɔɛ/ seems to be realized as [ai]??). Gros Ventre also had two palatalized consonants, /tʲ/ and /bʲ/, giving it the consonant inventory: /b bʲ t tʲ ʦ ʧ k ʔ/, /θ s h/, /n/, /w j/.
Re: Odd natlang features thread
I can aswell add this here: In Piitish the determiners are declined with |-a when they end a sentence.
If I stop posting out of the blue it probably is because my computer and the board won't cooperate and let me log in.!
- Nortaneous
- Sumerul
- Posts: 4544
- Joined: Mon Apr 13, 2009 1:52 am
- Location: the Imperial Corridor
Re: Odd natlang features thread
The grammar pack.Drydic Guy wrote:where did you get thisNortaneous wrote:Might as well bring this back, since we've got its diachronic equivalent going now also.
Allowed final clusters in Qiang are either the same as or a subset of allowed initial clusters, and the only allowed C1s in a cluster (all clusters are two consonants) are /ʂ x χ/. However, /ʂ/ is realized as [s] before /t d/, and as [ɕ] before /pi pe bi tɕ dʑ/, and there's regressive voicing assimilation. So, you can have both xɬi̯ex (xɬi̯exbuʐ 'loess') and tʂʰexɬ 'sip', both ɣlu 'roll' and əɣl 'upright', etc.
edit: Qiang also has rhoticity harmony:
ʀuɑ + kʰe˞ > ʀuɑ˞kʰe˞
me + we˞ > me˞we˞
(Only /i e ə a/ appear with rhoticity in roots, but all vowels can take it, since the first-person plural marker for verbs is -˞.)
WHERE
If you want something even worse, check out the official orthography. <v> is /X/.
Siöö jandeng raiglin zåbei tandiüłåd;
nää džunnfin kukuch vklaivei sivei tåd.
Chei. Chei. Chei. Chei. Chei. Chei. Chei.
nää džunnfin kukuch vklaivei sivei tåd.
Chei. Chei. Chei. Chei. Chei. Chei. Chei.
Re: Odd natlang features thread
In non-literate tribal-level societies languages tend to accumulate irregularities and grammatical nuttiness.Ouagadougou wrote:Reading about the insanities of Athabaskan tongues makes me wonder how they ever got to be that way in the first place.
- Aurora Rossa
- Smeric
- Posts: 1138
- Joined: Mon Aug 11, 2003 11:46 am
- Location: The vendée of America
- Contact:
Re: Odd natlang features thread
Are you saying that languages among literate non-tribal peoples tend toward greater regularity?TaylorS wrote:In non-literate tribal-level societies languages tend to accumulate irregularities and grammatical nuttiness.
"There was a particular car I soon came to think of as distinctly St. Louis-ish: a gigantic white S.U.V. with a W. bumper sticker on it for George W. Bush."
- Drydic
- Smeric
- Posts: 1652
- Joined: Tue Oct 08, 2002 12:23 pm
- Location: I am a prisoner in my own mind.
- Contact:
Re: Odd natlang features thread
Care to back this up?TaylorS wrote:In non-literate tribal-level societies languages tend to accumulate irregularities and grammatical nuttiness.Ouagadougou wrote:Reading about the insanities of Athabaskan tongues makes me wonder how they ever got to be that way in the first place.
Re: Odd natlang features thread
I have heard that once a language become "important" enough in its area that people who didn't grow up speaking it have to learn it, it starts losing its most ridiculous features, because L2s will just ignore them. It sounds convincing, but I don't know how true it actually is, since hunter-gatherers routinely speak four or five languages without losing their crazy features.
Re: Odd natlang features thread
TaylorS wrote:In non-literate tribal-level societies languages tend to accumulate irregularities and grammatical nuttiness.Ouagadougou wrote:Reading about the insanities of Athabaskan tongues makes me wonder how they ever got to be that way in the first place.
Shrdlu, on the page before, wrote:Simple. To make the chance of a misunderstanding between two individuals as small as possible.Ouagadougou wrote:Reading about the insanities of Athabaskan tongues makes me wonder how they ever got to be that way in the first place.
If I stop posting out of the blue it probably is because my computer and the board won't cooperate and let me log in.!
- Nortaneous
- Sumerul
- Posts: 4544
- Joined: Mon Apr 13, 2009 1:52 am
- Location: the Imperial Corridor
Re: Odd natlang features thread
To prevent this thread from being eaten by the stupid:
Re: Qiang phonotactics, I probably should've mentioned that the language tends toward monosyllabic words, usually by dropping schwas: (also note final consonant mutation: pʰ kʰ dz dʐ b Cʰ > ɸ~f x z l w C)
sə 'tree' + pʰə 'forest' > səf 'tree/shrub'
me˞ː 'rain' + kʰə˞ 'fall' > me˞x 'frost'
mɑ 'NEG' + dʐə 'able' > mɑl 'not able'
sə 'IMP' + tɕʰə 'drink, eat wet foods' > sətɕ
So that might have something to do with the odd cluster thing, although the grammar doesn't take any guesses.
Re: Qiang phonotactics, I probably should've mentioned that the language tends toward monosyllabic words, usually by dropping schwas: (also note final consonant mutation: pʰ kʰ dz dʐ b Cʰ > ɸ~f x z l w C)
sə 'tree' + pʰə 'forest' > səf 'tree/shrub'
me˞ː 'rain' + kʰə˞ 'fall' > me˞x 'frost'
mɑ 'NEG' + dʐə 'able' > mɑl 'not able'
sə 'IMP' + tɕʰə 'drink, eat wet foods' > sətɕ
So that might have something to do with the odd cluster thing, although the grammar doesn't take any guesses.
Siöö jandeng raiglin zåbei tandiüłåd;
nää džunnfin kukuch vklaivei sivei tåd.
Chei. Chei. Chei. Chei. Chei. Chei. Chei.
nää džunnfin kukuch vklaivei sivei tåd.
Chei. Chei. Chei. Chei. Chei. Chei. Chei.
Re: Odd natlang features thread
I'm like obsessed with languages that lack low vowels, because you'd be hard pressed to find anything more unique. I only wish there where like more than a few American Indian Languages.Whimemsz wrote:- Also, the Arapahoan languages don't have any low vowels, e.g. the vowels of Arapaho and Gros Ventre are /i(:) ɨ(:) ɛ(:) ɔ(:)/ (historical *a(:) changed to *o(:) in Proto-Arapahoan, whose vowel inventory was: */i i: e e: o o:/). Unfortunately detailed stuff on the exact phonetics involved aren't easy to come by (plus Gros Ventre is basically dead now), but it definitely seems like the normal realizations of the latter two vowels are [ɛ] and [ɔ] (except /ɔɛ/ seems to be realized as [ai]??). Gros Ventre also had two palatalized consonants, /tʲ/ and /bʲ/, giving it the consonant inventory: /b bʲ t tʲ ʦ ʧ k ʔ/, /θ s h/, /n/, /w j/.
If I stop posting out of the blue it probably is because my computer and the board won't cooperate and let me log in.!
Re: Odd natlang features thread
There's a few reasons why it might be so: speech communities [groups of people who are likely to come in linguistic contact with each other] are smaller in premodern societies, and more defined as well, I mean, it's quite likely that two random hunter-gatherers living in the same continent will never hear or talk to each other, or come in contact with written material authored by the other. By contrast, you, the reader of this post, whoever you might be, are probably reading this a quarter of a planet away from me, and I've spoken plenty, as with phones and not letters, with native spanishers that live in Iberia, the Caribbean, North America and most of South America, not to mention Oceania. This might well make easier the development of a standard form of the lang, and limit the features of dialectal variations to allophony, since even expressions move through space by osmosis; I use, in my speech, for example, plenty of mexicanisms, argentinisms, and hispanisms. so yeah, Taylor might be rait.Drydic Guy wrote:Care to back this up?TaylorS wrote:In non-literate tribal-level societies languages tend to accumulate irregularities and grammatical nuttiness.Ouagadougou wrote:Reading about the insanities of Athabaskan tongues makes me wonder how they ever got to be that way in the first place.
-
- Avisaru
- Posts: 704
- Joined: Fri Dec 03, 2010 9:41 am
- Location: NY, USA
Re: Odd natlang features thread
can we have some evidence please, instead of philosophy?Torco wrote:might
please?
Re: Odd natlang features thread
don't ask me for evidence, Bob, I don't care either way, I'm just chiming in, quite unadversarially, I assure you.Bob Johnson wrote:can we have some evidence please, instead of philosophy?Torco wrote:might
please?
and what's wrong with thinking again?
though... Africa seems to have quite a bit more linguistic diversity than the entirety of America [the continent, mind you], And even Europe, where plenty of 'langs are spoken, doesn't seem to have as many per surface unit as, say, the Brazilian rainforest... so there, some evidence.
Want some nice chi square coefficients as well ?
Re: Odd natlang features thread
The Power of Babel by American linguist John McWhorter.Drydic Guy wrote:Care to back this up?TaylorS wrote: In non-literate tribal-level societies languages tend to accumulate irregularities and grammatical nuttiness.
Re: Odd natlang features thread
Epic language is epic.Nortaneous wrote:Might as well bring this back, since we've got its diachronic equivalent going now also.
Allowed final clusters in Qiang are either the same as or a subset of allowed initial clusters, and the only allowed C1s in a cluster (all clusters are two consonants) are /ʂ x χ/. However, /ʂ/ is realized as [s] before /t d/, and as [ɕ] before /pi pe bi tɕ dʑ/, and there's regressive voicing assimilation. So, you can have both xɬi̯ex (xɬi̯exbuʐ 'loess') and tʂʰexɬ 'sip', both ɣlu 'roll' and əɣl 'upright', etc.
edit: Qiang also has rhoticity harmony:
ʀuɑ + kʰe˞ > ʀuɑ˞kʰe˞
me + we˞ > me˞we˞
(Only /i e ə a/ appear with rhoticity in roots, but all vowels can take it, since the first-person plural marker for verbs is -˞.)
I think I'll start working on a phonology like this.
Yo jo moy garsmichte pa
Re: Odd natlang features thread
Okay, but that's not an argument, that's just a source; what's McWhorter's argument in favor of this claim?TaylorS wrote:The Power of Babel by American linguist John McWhorter.Drydic Guy wrote:Care to back this up?TaylorS wrote: In non-literate tribal-level societies languages tend to accumulate irregularities and grammatical nuttiness.
Re: Odd natlang features thread
Also:
In another thread, I wrote:[In] Huamelultec (aka Lowland Oaxaca Chontal), [the] only ejectives/glottalized obstruents are: /fʼ sʼ ɬʼ xʼ/. The phonetic realizations vary pretty widely, but in part because they alternate morphophonologically with corresponding plain fricatives, Ian Maddieson, Heriberto Avelino, and Loretta O'Connor analyze them as basically glottalized/ejective fricatives. (Based on the frequency of the realizations of each one, it would also be reasonable to analyze them as respectively /fʼ tsʼ tɬʼ kʼ/).
NE: Source: Maddieson et al, 2009, "The Phonetic Structure of Oaxaca Chontal", IJAL vol. 75(1): 69-101
-
- Lebom
- Posts: 196
- Joined: Tue May 11, 2010 5:50 pm
- Location: Berlin, Germany
Re: Odd natlang features thread
Oh, that's interesting. Upper Necaxa Totonac, another Mesoamerican language, has /sʼ ʃʼ ɬʼ/ as its only ejectives, plus /tsʼ/ occuring in a few sound symbolic words ("/sʼa̰ta̰/ small > /tsʼa̰ta̰/ itty-bitty"). Apparently they correspond to consonant + q in other Totonacan languages (*/q/ turned into /ʔ/ in UNT unconditionally).Whimemsz wrote:In another thread, I wrote:[In] Huamelultec (aka Lowland Oaxaca Chontal), [the] only ejectives/glottalized obstruents are: /fʼ sʼ ɬʼ xʼ/. The phonetic realizations vary pretty widely, but in part because they alternate morphophonologically with corresponding plain fricatives, Ian Maddieson, Heriberto Avelino, and Loretta O'Connor analyze them as basically glottalized/ejective fricatives. (Based on the frequency of the realizations of each one, it would also be reasonable to analyze them as respectively /fʼ tsʼ tɬʼ kʼ/).
NE: Source: Maddieson et al, 2009, "The Phonetic Structure of Oaxaca Chontal", IJAL vol. 75(1): 69-101
Re: Odd natlang features thread
he claims that in small tribal communities irregularities are less likely to be eliminated by analogical leveling because of the "everyone knows everyone" effect of such small communities making it less likely for misunderstandings.Whimemsz wrote:Okay, but that's not an argument, that's just a source; what's McWhorter's argument in favor of this claim?TaylorS wrote:The Power of Babel by American linguist John McWhorter.Drydic Guy wrote:Care to back this up?TaylorS wrote: In non-literate tribal-level societies languages tend to accumulate irregularities and grammatical nuttiness.
Re: Odd natlang features thread
Unwanted English tip: In English, America on its own means the USA. North America and South America are considered separate continents. To refer to them together, we say the Americas.Torco wrote: the entirety of America [the continent, mind you]
Glossing Abbreviations: COMP = comparative, C = complementiser, ACS / ICS = accessible / inaccessible, GDV = gerundive, SPEC / NSPC = specific / non-specific
________
MY MUSIC
________
MY MUSIC
- 2+3 clusivity
- Avisaru
- Posts: 454
- Joined: Fri Mar 16, 2012 5:34 pm
Re: Odd natlang features thread
Voiced aspirates! http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Southeastern_!Xung
*face-palm* Even Ladefoged and Maddieson find it valid.
*face-palm* Even Ladefoged and Maddieson find it valid.
linguoboy wrote:So that's what it looks like when the master satirist is moistened by his own moutarde.
Re: Odd natlang features thread
Why wouldn't they? (Those aren't even technically voiced aspirates, they're voice contours, as the description says. You see the same thing in !Xoo clicks.)
I recently learned, however, that true voiced aspirates (not breathy voiced either-- voiced stops with a delayed VOT on the vowel) do occur in some Austronesian language. Can't remember which.
I recently learned, however, that true voiced aspirates (not breathy voiced either-- voiced stops with a delayed VOT on the vowel) do occur in some Austronesian language. Can't remember which.
"It will not come by waiting for it. It will not be said, 'Here it is,' or 'There it is.' Rather, the Kingdom of the Father is spread out upon the earth, and men do not see it."
– The Gospel of Thomas
– The Gospel of Thomas
Re: Odd natlang features thread
>:|Xephyr wrote:Why wouldn't they? (Those aren't even technically voiced aspirates, they're voice contours, as the description says. You see the same thing in !Xoo clicks.)
I recently learned, however, that true voiced aspirates (not breathy voiced either-- voiced stops with a delayed VOT on the vowel) do occur in some Austronesian language. Can't remember which.
Some North Sarawak languages
- Nortaneous
- Sumerul
- Posts: 4544
- Joined: Mon Apr 13, 2009 1:52 am
- Location: the Imperial Corridor
Re: Odd natlang features thread
Saanich:
2.2.1. ∥-í∥ ‘persistent’.
1. This is an aspectual morpheme opposed to unmarked ‘non-persistent’. It indicates that the activity expressed in the stem to which it is attached continues past inception as a state. The absence or presence of this suffix allows differences in meaning comparable to the differences in such English pairs as ‘figure out/know’, ‘look at/watch’, and ‘take/hold’.
This affix is morphophonemically unusual in that it has qualities of the radical morphological processes (see §2.3). It is classified here as a suffix since it always follows and never directly affects the root phonologically. But it does directly affect other suffixes. ∥-í∥ ‘persistent’ is what might be called a "parasitic" morpheme. Its placement requires the presence of another suffix having an underlying /ə/ that acts as "host". This /í/ assumes the position of the rightmost /ə/ of a host suffix that is not preceded by a suffix with a non-schwa. This morpheme has never been recorded occurring without another suffix having an underlying ∥ə∥.
Siöö jandeng raiglin zåbei tandiüłåd;
nää džunnfin kukuch vklaivei sivei tåd.
Chei. Chei. Chei. Chei. Chei. Chei. Chei.
nää džunnfin kukuch vklaivei sivei tåd.
Chei. Chei. Chei. Chei. Chei. Chei. Chei.
- Nortaneous
- Sumerul
- Posts: 4544
- Joined: Mon Apr 13, 2009 1:52 am
- Location: the Imperial Corridor
Re: Odd natlang features thread
Pacoh has its creaky vowels lowered in comparison to its modal vowels, such that there are no low modal vowels and no high creaky vowels. (Modal and creaky vowels only contrast in the mid height.) This even extends to the diphthongs.
Siöö jandeng raiglin zåbei tandiüłåd;
nää džunnfin kukuch vklaivei sivei tåd.
Chei. Chei. Chei. Chei. Chei. Chei. Chei.
nää džunnfin kukuch vklaivei sivei tåd.
Chei. Chei. Chei. Chei. Chei. Chei. Chei.