Linguistic Quackery Thread, take 2

Discussions worth keeping around later.
Thry
Smeric
Smeric
Posts: 2085
Joined: Tue Oct 04, 2011 12:15 pm
Location: Spain

Re: Linguistic Quackery Thread, take 2

Post by Thry »

WeepingElf wrote:Just that. This blunder doesn't get more than about 50 millinylands.
It was enough to devoid* me of all my willingness to talk to him xD

*I was looking for another verb "_ someone of something" (to take it out of them). Have any of you seen it around?

User avatar
masako
Smeric
Smeric
Posts: 1731
Joined: Sat Nov 06, 2004 4:31 pm
Location: 가매
Contact:

Re: Linguistic Quackery Thread, take 2

Post by masako »

Wait. What?

Kharosthi is from the 2nd millennium BCE?! That's like a 1700 year mistake? That's baffling.

Mr. Z
Avisaru
Avisaru
Posts: 430
Joined: Tue Feb 15, 2011 2:51 pm

Re: Linguistic Quackery Thread, take 2

Post by Mr. Z »

WeepingElf wrote:
Mr. Z wrote:You will have to explain your millinylands system to me some day, you know. :P
It is simple. A nyland is a unit of measurement for linguistic quackery. The standard is Edo Nyland, a crackpot who claimed that all languages were conlangs made by Basque monks or something like that. That is 1 nyland. Or 1000 millinylands. As few people ever get close to the quackery of Edo Nyland, most linguistic quackeries are in a range of a few millinylands to a few hundred millinylands.
Oh, it's a milli-nyland... I thought it was something like a milliny-land, and then it doesn't make any sense. Now I remember the last time you explained it.
Přemysl wrote:
Kereb wrote:they are nerdissimus inter nerdes
Oh god, we truly are nerdy. My first instinct was "why didn't he just use sunt and have it all in Latin?".
Languages I speak fluently
English, עברית

Languages I am studying
العربية, 日本語

Conlangs
Athonian

User avatar
Morrígan
Avisaru
Avisaru
Posts: 396
Joined: Thu Sep 09, 2004 9:33 am
Location: Wizard Tower

Re: Linguistic Quackery Thread, take 2

Post by Morrígan »

I have this feeling that the Nyland scale should be based in some way on the log-likelihood of the proposed hypothesis. One way we might start is my quantifying the probability of coincidental similarities between languages.

User avatar
Vuvuzela
Avisaru
Avisaru
Posts: 317
Joined: Fri Apr 13, 2012 1:34 pm

Re: Linguistic Quackery Thread, take 2

Post by Vuvuzela »

Q= Quackery Quotient
C= probability of however many resemblances the would-be linguist identifies or greater occurring by chance, if applicable. Stands for "Chance".
O=Number of possible alterations to the theory that would make it simpler while no less adequately explaining the evidence. Stands for "Occam's razor"
M= The number of times the comparative method is applied in a logical manner. Stands for "method"
L= Number of characters in the corpus. Stands for "Length"
I know there are probably other variables, and they might be weighted differently, but perhaps some equation akin to
Q=(CO-M)/L
Would do nicely.

Wattmann
Avisaru
Avisaru
Posts: 352
Joined: Mon Jan 23, 2012 4:50 am

Re: Linguistic Quackery Thread, take 2

Post by Wattmann »

But what is the measure of logic, then?
Warning: Recovering bilingual, attempting trilinguaility. Knowledge of French left behind in childhood. Currently repairing bilinguality. Repair stalled. Above content may be a touch off.

User avatar
vampireshark
Avisaru
Avisaru
Posts: 738
Joined: Thu Dec 04, 2008 7:02 pm
Location: Luxembourg
Contact:

Re: Linguistic Quackery Thread, take 2

Post by vampireshark »

Ean wrote:
WeepingElf wrote:Just that. This blunder doesn't get more than about 50 millinylands.
It was enough to devoid* me of all my willingness to talk to him xD

*I was looking for another verb "_ someone of something" (to take it out of them). Have any of you seen it around?
Drain, perhaps?


Fortunately, as I'm a science person, I haven't seen too many instances of idiocy as of late. I should look more carefully, though.
What do you see in the night?

In search of victims subjects to appear on banknotes. Inquire within.

User avatar
Whimemsz
Avisaru
Avisaru
Posts: 690
Joined: Fri Jun 20, 2003 4:56 pm
Location: Gimaamaa onibaaganing

Re: Linguistic Quackery Thread, take 2

Post by Whimemsz »

deprive? divest?

Thry
Smeric
Smeric
Posts: 2085
Joined: Tue Oct 04, 2011 12:15 pm
Location: Spain

Re: Linguistic Quackery Thread, take 2

Post by Thry »

Whimemsz wrote:deprive?
gotcha

Here's your cookie phoneme: /k/

Thry
Smeric
Smeric
Posts: 2085
Joined: Tue Oct 04, 2011 12:15 pm
Location: Spain

Re: Linguistic Quackery Thread, take 2

Post by Thry »

vampireshark wrote:Fortunately, as I'm a science person, I haven't seen too many instances of idiocy as of late. I should look more carefully, though.
I'm sure there's enough idiocy for every field.

User avatar
communistplot
Avisaru
Avisaru
Posts: 494
Joined: Thu Oct 07, 2010 6:49 am
Location: La Ciudad de Nueva York
Contact:

Re: Linguistic Quackery Thread, take 2

Post by communistplot »

So apparently there are no American English dialects and all differences are slang, being told that brought me out of the best alcohol induced mood I'd ever been in.
The Artist Formerly Known as Caleone

My Conlangs (WIP):

Pasic - Proto-Northeastern Bay - Asséta - Àpzó

User avatar
Pinetree
Lebom
Lebom
Posts: 204
Joined: Sun Apr 22, 2012 1:55 pm

Re: Linguistic Quackery Thread, take 2

Post by Pinetree »

Caleone wrote:So apparently there are no American English dialects and all differences are slang, being told that brought me out of the best alcohol induced mood I'd ever been in.
Who told you that?

User avatar
Vuvuzela
Avisaru
Avisaru
Posts: 317
Joined: Fri Apr 13, 2012 1:34 pm

Re: Linguistic Quackery Thread, take 2

Post by Vuvuzela »

Caleone wrote:So apparently there are no American English dialects and all differences are slang, being told that brought me out of the best alcohol induced mood I'd ever been in.
A've never heard in ma ho laf thayut the ayukseyunt of the Amer'can Sayouth was just slang.

User avatar
communistplot
Avisaru
Avisaru
Posts: 494
Joined: Thu Oct 07, 2010 6:49 am
Location: La Ciudad de Nueva York
Contact:

Re: Linguistic Quackery Thread, take 2

Post by communistplot »

Hubris Incalculable wrote:
Caleone wrote:So apparently there are no American English dialects and all differences are slang, being told that brought me out of the best alcohol induced mood I'd ever been in.
Who told you that?
A guy I work with, he does freelance journalism for NPR as his day job apparently, he tried to use that against me in his argument, y'know journalist vs. linguistics major-future dialectologist, this makes sense.
The Artist Formerly Known as Caleone

My Conlangs (WIP):

Pasic - Proto-Northeastern Bay - Asséta - Àpzó

User avatar
Vuvuzela
Avisaru
Avisaru
Posts: 317
Joined: Fri Apr 13, 2012 1:34 pm

Re: Linguistic Quackery Thread, take 2

Post by Vuvuzela »

Caleone wrote:
A guy I work with, he does freelance journalism for NPR as his day job apparently, he tried to use that against me in his argument, y'know journalist vs. linguistics major-future dialectologist, this makes sense.
In what context does that support any argument?

User avatar
communistplot
Avisaru
Avisaru
Posts: 494
Joined: Thu Oct 07, 2010 6:49 am
Location: La Ciudad de Nueva York
Contact:

Re: Linguistic Quackery Thread, take 2

Post by communistplot »

That's exactly the thing, he claimed to know more about the English language than me because of his journalism credentials, which makes no sense in an argument at all, I could see if he argued he'd studied under Labov or Crystal, and even then his ideas are just stupid, but journalist? Really?
The Artist Formerly Known as Caleone

My Conlangs (WIP):

Pasic - Proto-Northeastern Bay - Asséta - Àpzó

User avatar
Pthagnar
Avisaru
Avisaru
Posts: 702
Joined: Fri Sep 13, 2002 12:45 pm
Location: Hole of Aspiration

Re: Linguistic Quackery Thread, take 2

Post by Pthagnar »

journalism is the best job for people who, when they learn P, their immediate reflex is to make fun of everyone else for not knowing P

User avatar
Vuvuzela
Avisaru
Avisaru
Posts: 317
Joined: Fri Apr 13, 2012 1:34 pm

Re: Linguistic Quackery Thread, take 2

Post by Vuvuzela »

Caleone wrote:That's exactly the thing, he claimed to know more about the English language than me because of his journalism credentials, which makes no sense in an argument at all, I could see if he argued he'd studied under Labov or Crystal, and even then his ideas are just stupid, but journalist? Really?
Quickly! Regurgitating random facts contest!
"Catalan is a dialect of Spanish!"
"Unlike Spanish, English doesn't even have dialects!"
"Oh, yeah, well that's because it was made up by Basque monks!"
"I thought it descended from mixing Latin and French."
"That's what the Monks want you to think!"
"Wait, isn't Basque just a dialect of Spanish?"
"No, Portuguese."
"What about Japanese?"
"No, you're thinking of Finnish."
"I thought that was a dialect of Swedish."
"They all come from Sanskrit."
"Including Romani?"
"No, that's just the purest form of Latin"

User avatar
communistplot
Avisaru
Avisaru
Posts: 494
Joined: Thu Oct 07, 2010 6:49 am
Location: La Ciudad de Nueva York
Contact:

Re: Linguistic Quackery Thread, take 2

Post by communistplot »

Vuvuzela wrote:
Caleone wrote:That's exactly the thing, he claimed to know more about the English language than me because of his journalism credentials, which makes no sense in an argument at all, I could see if he argued he'd studied under Labov or Crystal, and even then his ideas are just stupid, but journalist? Really?
Quickly! Regurgitating random facts contest!
"Catalan is a dialect of Spanish!"
"Unlike Spanish, English doesn't even have dialects!"
"Oh, yeah, well that's because it was made up by Basque monks!"
"I thought it descended from mixing Latin and French."
"That's what the Monks want you to think!"
"Wait, isn't Basque just a dialect of Spanish?"
"No, Portuguese."
"What about Japanese?"
"No, you're thinking of Finnish."
"I thought that was a dialect of Swedish."
"They all come from Sanskrit."
"Including Romani?"
"No, that's just the purest form of Latin"
lulzwut, of course all of that came from Sanskrit though, don'tcha know?
The Artist Formerly Known as Caleone

My Conlangs (WIP):

Pasic - Proto-Northeastern Bay - Asséta - Àpzó

Thry
Smeric
Smeric
Posts: 2085
Joined: Tue Oct 04, 2011 12:15 pm
Location: Spain

Re: Linguistic Quackery Thread, take 2

Post by Thry »

"That's what the Monks want you to think!"

User avatar
Vuvuzela
Avisaru
Avisaru
Posts: 317
Joined: Fri Apr 13, 2012 1:34 pm

Re: Linguistic Quackery Thread, take 2

Post by Vuvuzela »

Ean wrote:
"That's what the Monks want you to think!"

User avatar
Pinetree
Lebom
Lebom
Posts: 204
Joined: Sun Apr 22, 2012 1:55 pm

Re: Linguistic Quackery Thread, take 2

Post by Pinetree »

Vuvuzela wrote:
Ean wrote:
"That's what the Monks want you to think!"

Bob Johnson
Avisaru
Avisaru
Posts: 704
Joined: Fri Dec 03, 2010 9:41 am
Location: NY, USA

Re: Linguistic Quackery Thread, take 2

Post by Bob Johnson »

Hubris Incalculable wrote:
Vuvuzela wrote:
Ean wrote:
"That's what the Monks want you to think!"

User avatar
clawgrip
Smeric
Smeric
Posts: 1723
Joined: Wed Feb 29, 2012 8:21 am
Location: Tokyo

Re: Linguistic Quackery Thread, take 2

Post by clawgrip »

Maybe I'm missing something here, but why would you stress "the"? The only reason I can think of for doing that is if you were correcting someone who had said, "That's what a monks want you to think!"

User avatar
Pinetree
Lebom
Lebom
Posts: 204
Joined: Sun Apr 22, 2012 1:55 pm

Re: Linguistic Quackery Thread, take 2

Post by Pinetree »

clawgrip wrote:Maybe I'm missing something here, but why would you stress "the"? The only reason I can think of for doing that is if you were correcting someone who had said, "That's what a monks want you to think!"
well, if the speaker wanted to assert that there was only one group of monks worth talking about, he might stress the article.

Post Reply