In the US, a Ph.D. in the sciences is typically a five-year program: the first two are devoted to coursework with the last three to research. I'm in my third year.sirdanilot wrote:Isn't a phd project something you commit yourself to for say three or four years? I don't think it's something you can just give up on now is it.
Try to go to conferences and the like abroad for a change of pace during your stay in ohio. I could imagine not wanting to stay in ohio indefinitely, it does not strike me as the most interesting place in the world.
Here's the situation: I applied for the project in Luxembourg last July. I got rejected for funding twice, once directly from the PI (not really a rejection, but that he had a more qualified applicant and that I didn't officially have a Master's degree, rendering me ineligible) and the other from a Luxembourgish funding organization, the FNR. The PI asked me to apply one final time for funding from the FNR, as it's something he wants to do and something I want to work on as well.
My current adviser knows I applied for the funding from the FNR and does support it, primarily because he's in a perpetually precarious funding position and doesn't know how exactly he'd fund me for the final year of my Ph.D. I'm only guaranteed one additional year of funding, and that funding's only if I split my time between the project I'm working on and another industrial project. And, quite frankly, I would prefer to spend an extra year in graduate school with stable funding rather than being in a situation where I don't know if I'll be able to keep being paid. Another part of the precarious funding issue is that I don't know how much funding there'd be for conferences or travel.
So, really, it more boils down to guaranteed financial stability, a project I want to work, and being in Europe on versus a project I really want to continue with, primarily because of its potential and the cool things that can be done with it, and a precarious funding situation.






