Pacific Northwest Accent (Cascadian)
[ɫ] is a different case because this can be described as a natural class: back lateral. If you claim this isn't applicable to "bunched r" (as is certainly the case for Swedish "[ɧ]", which can be anything from [χ̳] to [fʷ]), then I don't see a reason to treat that as a single "sound".
Analogously actually, something like [ɰ˞] (I've even used this before, just didn't remember the thing!) would be an even better sign for any English "back non-coronal rhotic". My point is however that including other non-standard but non-back rhotics, say [ʋ], while still excluding standard [ɹ], under the same is a no-go.
Analogously actually, something like [ɰ˞] (I've even used this before, just didn't remember the thing!) would be an even better sign for any English "back non-coronal rhotic". My point is however that including other non-standard but non-back rhotics, say [ʋ], while still excluding standard [ɹ], under the same is a no-go.
[ˌʔaɪsəˈpʰɻ̊ʷoʊpɪɫ ˈʔæɫkəɦɔɫ]
- Aurora Rossa
- Smeric

- Posts: 1138
- Joined: Mon Aug 11, 2003 11:46 am
- Location: The vendée of America
- Contact:
I wouldn't mind hearing more about this strong "s" in the Seattle dialect. What does it entail from a phonological perspective and where does it occur?

"There was a particular car I soon came to think of as distinctly St. Louis-ish: a gigantic white S.U.V. with a W. bumper sticker on it for George W. Bush."
- Nortaneous
- Sumerul

- Posts: 4544
- Joined: Mon Apr 13, 2009 1:52 am
- Location: the Imperial Corridor
Natural classes can't be based on auditory similarity? English rhotics vary pretty heavily in their actual realization, but it's hard to tell, for example, [v\_G] from [R`] or [G_j_w] or whatever else.Tropylium wrote:[ɫ] is a different case because this can be described as a natural class: back lateral. If you claim this isn't applicable to "bunched r" (as is certainly the case for Swedish "[ɧ]", which can be anything from [χ̳] to [fʷ]), then I don't see a reason to treat that as a single "sound".
Siöö jandeng raiglin zåbei tandiüłåd;
nää džunnfin kukuch vklaivei sivei tåd.
Chei. Chei. Chei. Chei. Chei. Chei. Chei.
nää džunnfin kukuch vklaivei sivei tåd.
Chei. Chei. Chei. Chei. Chei. Chei. Chei.
In the case of rhotics, this is definitely the case. My own rhotic, for instance, varies by position and environment between [ɰˤ], [ʁ̞ˤ], and [ɹ̠͡ɰˤ], yet is acoustically very close to the typical General American [ɹ] or [ɹ̠] despite being articulated completely differently from it. (This is to the point that I have had people insist from recordings that I must have [ɹ] or [ɹ̠], despite that I actually find those to be very hard to properly articulate.)Nortaneous wrote:Natural classes can't be based on auditory similarity? English rhotics vary pretty heavily in their actual realization, but it's hard to tell, for example, [v\_G] from [R`] or [G_j_w] or whatever else.Tropylium wrote:[ɫ] is a different case because this can be described as a natural class: back lateral. If you claim this isn't applicable to "bunched r" (as is certainly the case for Swedish "[ɧ]", which can be anything from [χ̳] to [fʷ]), then I don't see a reason to treat that as a single "sound".
- Aurora Rossa
- Smeric

- Posts: 1138
- Joined: Mon Aug 11, 2003 11:46 am
- Location: The vendée of America
- Contact:
- Aurora Rossa
- Smeric

- Posts: 1138
- Joined: Mon Aug 11, 2003 11:46 am
- Location: The vendée of America
- Contact:
I want to sound authentic when I get to Seattle after all, so that I can fit into the local culture better. I can't seem to find many reports on the strong /s/, although admittedly the new Google feature of changing the search with each letter you type is not helping matters.

"There was a particular car I soon came to think of as distinctly St. Louis-ish: a gigantic white S.U.V. with a W. bumper sticker on it for George W. Bush."
Yeah, and I bet I'd make tons of friends in Alabama if I put on a fake Southern accent when I moved there.Eddy wrote:I want to sound authentic when I get to Seattle after all, so that I can fit into the local culture better. I can't seem to find many reports on the strong /s/, although admittedly the new Google feature of changing the search with each letter you type is not helping matters.
"It will not come by waiting for it. It will not be said, 'Here it is,' or 'There it is.' Rather, the Kingdom of the Father is spread out upon the earth, and men do not see it."
– The Gospel of Thomas
– The Gospel of Thomas
- Aurora Rossa
- Smeric

- Posts: 1138
- Joined: Mon Aug 11, 2003 11:46 am
- Location: The vendée of America
- Contact:
I am not talking about a fake Cascadian accent but a real one based on actual phonological studies and so forth. I also want more than just friendship. I want to fit in.Yeah, and I bet I'd make tons of friends in Alabama if I put on a fake Southern accent when I moved there.
And you lived in Alabama?

"There was a particular car I soon came to think of as distinctly St. Louis-ish: a gigantic white S.U.V. with a W. bumper sticker on it for George W. Bush."
- Radius Solis
- Smeric

- Posts: 1248
- Joined: Tue Mar 30, 2004 5:40 pm
- Location: Si'ahl
- Contact:
Ssufficce it to sssay, there are few if any sssstudiessss on thissss that would be usssseful in helping you change your acccccent. Jusssssst ssssssssspeak like normal and nobody will tell the differenccccccccccccccccce. With your vowels maybe, but not with your ssssssssssssssssssssssibilantssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssss.
- Nortaneous
- Sumerul

- Posts: 4544
- Joined: Mon Apr 13, 2009 1:52 am
- Location: the Imperial Corridor
eddy i have a massive redneck accent and the only times i've been to the midwest i definitely did not fit in even though i sounded almost exactly like them
if you really think that culture is equivalent to how you sound, shut the fuck up and go outside for once
if you really think that culture is equivalent to how you sound, shut the fuck up and go outside for once
Siöö jandeng raiglin zåbei tandiüłåd;
nää džunnfin kukuch vklaivei sivei tåd.
Chei. Chei. Chei. Chei. Chei. Chei. Chei.
nää džunnfin kukuch vklaivei sivei tåd.
Chei. Chei. Chei. Chei. Chei. Chei. Chei.
- Aurora Rossa
- Smeric

- Posts: 1138
- Joined: Mon Aug 11, 2003 11:46 am
- Location: The vendée of America
- Contact:
I would think you of all people would support my goal here, Nortaneous. Don't you consider it important for immigrants to assimilate to the culture of their new home and learn the language as soon as possible?

"There was a particular car I soon came to think of as distinctly St. Louis-ish: a gigantic white S.U.V. with a W. bumper sticker on it for George W. Bush."
- Nortaneous
- Sumerul

- Posts: 4544
- Joined: Mon Apr 13, 2009 1:52 am
- Location: the Imperial Corridor
You already speak the language, and you probably follow at least a good approximation of the culture; obviously, you don't have the knowledge of bands, restaurants, and whatever else that are local to Seattle, but that's probably easy enough to fix.Eddy wrote:Don't you consider it important for immigrants to assimilate to the culture of their new home and learn the language as soon as possible?
Besides, most people don't notice minor phonological differences. I'd have to lose the redneck accent if I end up moving to, say, California, but major prosodic differences are a lot more marked than minor differences in the realization of sibilants, or, hell, even pronunciation differences in a few words. I have /ar/ where I'm "supposed to" have /or/ in a few words, but nobody gives a shit, and even in California, nobody would give a shit, because yeah, I spent 17 years in Maryland. People will joke about it, but nobody really cares; it's not like living in PG County and hating pizza from Ledo's. But even the Chinese kids with funny accents around here are still Marylanders as long as they eat at Ledo's and bitch about tourists, although they have accents far more distinctive than a St. Louis accent would be in Seattle. If you fit in well enough everywhere else, nobody gives a fuck how you sound as long as they can understand what you're saying and you don't sound like you're from a "bad" culture (rednecks, for example).
So basically language != culture. I fit better in Maryland than the Midwest, even though Marylanders think I sound like I'm from the Midwest. (Not entirely sure how that happened. It's probably because my dad's family is from Tennessee, so he also has the accent, and I don't go outside ever these days except for class so I don't talk to much of anyone else.)
Fuck it, I'm rambling. Just stop worrying so fucking much. Minor pronunciation differences are an insignificant enough part of culture that you can get by perfectly well without them. And if you're that worried for some reason, fuck it, learn a stereotypical exaggerated redneck accent, complete with [ˌg̥ɪɾʁ̟ˈɽʌ̃n] and [ʌ̃ːːːˈjɛə̯p̚] and [d̥ʌ̃n dɪjəd̥̚] all over the place, and play that shit for laughs.
Siöö jandeng raiglin zåbei tandiüłåd;
nää džunnfin kukuch vklaivei sivei tåd.
Chei. Chei. Chei. Chei. Chei. Chei. Chei.
nää džunnfin kukuch vklaivei sivei tåd.
Chei. Chei. Chei. Chei. Chei. Chei. Chei.
- Aurora Rossa
- Smeric

- Posts: 1138
- Joined: Mon Aug 11, 2003 11:46 am
- Location: The vendée of America
- Contact:
>:|
Yes and I've been told that MY accent is markedly "Canadian" even though I never noticed anything about it until I started to listen more carefully to the speech of my friends from Places.
One of the reasons I'm frustrated with your whole accent complex is that it seems to have started with a comment I made on skype, which is probably what you're referring to here. Yes, I remarked on your accent -- I think I remarked on everyone's accent at *some* point, as there were people from England and Finland in on those chats as well.
But then you won't listen to me when I say your accent is not a big deal. It's not that impressive. You WOULD sound different to my ears, cause you're from like two thousand miles away. I'm a language nerd, I notice accents; most people don't pay so much attention.
Saturday was always laughing and making me repeat myself when I said "about" ... but I'm not about to train myself to say it his way.
Yes and I've been told that MY accent is markedly "Canadian" even though I never noticed anything about it until I started to listen more carefully to the speech of my friends from Places.
One of the reasons I'm frustrated with your whole accent complex is that it seems to have started with a comment I made on skype, which is probably what you're referring to here. Yes, I remarked on your accent -- I think I remarked on everyone's accent at *some* point, as there were people from England and Finland in on those chats as well.
But then you won't listen to me when I say your accent is not a big deal. It's not that impressive. You WOULD sound different to my ears, cause you're from like two thousand miles away. I'm a language nerd, I notice accents; most people don't pay so much attention.
Saturday was always laughing and making me repeat myself when I said "about" ... but I'm not about to train myself to say it his way.
<Anaxandridas> How many artists do you know get paid?
<Anaxandridas> Seriously, name five.
<Anaxandridas> Seriously, name five.
- Aurora Rossa
- Smeric

- Posts: 1138
- Joined: Mon Aug 11, 2003 11:46 am
- Location: The vendée of America
- Contact:
But what is the problem with wanting to fit in better with the area where I will live (and presumably spend the rest of my life)?But then you won't listen to me when I say your accent is not a big deal. It's not that impressive. You WOULD sound different to my ears, cause you're from like two thousand miles away. I'm a language nerd, I notice accents; most people don't pay so much attention.

"There was a particular car I soon came to think of as distinctly St. Louis-ish: a gigantic white S.U.V. with a W. bumper sticker on it for George W. Bush."
Stop asking that. People keep answering you. Start listening.
Nobody said there's something wrong with wanting to fit in.
Everybody keeps telling you that YOUR WAY of trying to fit in is stupid and won't work.
But you lack the capacity for metacognition. You cannot examine your own ideas.
And so you cannot separate "trying to fit in" with "what I think is the way to try to fit in". You keep answering critiques of the latter as if they were critiques of the former.
Seriously, go back and re-read any time someone's told you this accent thing is stupid. They're not telling you that trying to adapt is a bad thing. They're telling you EDDY'S WAY OF ADAPTING is misguided and doomed to miserable failure.
Nobody said there's something wrong with wanting to fit in.
Everybody keeps telling you that YOUR WAY of trying to fit in is stupid and won't work.
But you lack the capacity for metacognition. You cannot examine your own ideas.
And so you cannot separate "trying to fit in" with "what I think is the way to try to fit in". You keep answering critiques of the latter as if they were critiques of the former.
Seriously, go back and re-read any time someone's told you this accent thing is stupid. They're not telling you that trying to adapt is a bad thing. They're telling you EDDY'S WAY OF ADAPTING is misguided and doomed to miserable failure.
<Anaxandridas> How many artists do you know get paid?
<Anaxandridas> Seriously, name five.
<Anaxandridas> Seriously, name five.
- Aurora Rossa
- Smeric

- Posts: 1138
- Joined: Mon Aug 11, 2003 11:46 am
- Location: The vendée of America
- Contact:
What makes it misguided and stupid? Haven't people changed their accents all the time for the sake of fitting in? I have usually heard it claimed that such changes are the main engine behind linguistic change.Seriously, go back and re-read any time someone's told you this accent thing is stupid. They're not telling you that trying to adapt is a bad thing. They're telling you EDDY'S WAY OF ADAPTING is misguided and doomed to miserable failure.

"There was a particular car I soon came to think of as distinctly St. Louis-ish: a gigantic white S.U.V. with a W. bumper sticker on it for George W. Bush."
- Radius Solis
- Smeric

- Posts: 1248
- Joined: Tue Mar 30, 2004 5:40 pm
- Location: Si'ahl
- Contact:
Accent adaptation is a natural process that generally will happen on its own, if you let it. People do not normally adapt their accents to those of new places by studying the phonetic features of the new speech variety and making an effort to switch to those. They do it by talking to people every day in the course of normal life, and gradually their pronunciation mostly or fully accommodates itself to the new norm without their ever having to notice.
It may be true that it happens faster if you are making a deliberate effort to change your accent. But 1. it will not even start happening until you are surrounded by the new accent in your daily life, and 2. I suspect strongly that those who make a conscious effort to try to adapt their speech are exactly the ones who never get it perfectly right. They let their brains get in the way.
It may be true that it happens faster if you are making a deliberate effort to change your accent. But 1. it will not even start happening until you are surrounded by the new accent in your daily life, and 2. I suspect strongly that those who make a conscious effort to try to adapt their speech are exactly the ones who never get it perfectly right. They let their brains get in the way.


